Tabling Motion News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Out the door. I think one of the key votes i would look for going up on the board early on is andy biggs. Andy biggs, not only has i think a reasonable mind, i think he can step back from this. He will also be very influential on others. As goes biggs, i think a number of them will also go. I really do. And for, you know, Matt Rosendale has to look people in the mirror and say you are criticizing the speaker for working with democrats but you are the one that will be voting with the democrats today. So john yeah, an interesting point to make. We wont have to wait long when the roll is called t...

President should be subject to impeachment inquiry. i will say this the position many members took was more nuanced than many think. many of the member like me supporting impeachment inquiry did not vote with -- did not oppose the tabling motion, because they didn't like this particular approach. and i sort of share that. i think what mr. green. >> meaning you don't like the going ahead with impeachment for ra racism as the reason. my feeling was this should have been referred to the judiciary committee rather than tabled. but i share the view that many colleagues share that this is not the ap...

motes. 22 republicans voted against it and all of the democrats. just before the vote, speaker boehner blamed president obama at the talks aimed at a bipartisan deal. >> i stuck my neck out a mile and i put revenues on the table. in order to try to come to an agreement to avert us being where we are. but a lot of people in this town can never say yes. a lot of people can never say yes. this house has acted and it is time for the administration and time for our colleagues across the aisle, put something on the table. tell us where you are. >> here is the thing. the conservatives resul...

Others have begun to constitutional option, that each senate, even congress can create its own rules, and when it does that, it's by majority vote, and if it's by majority vote, that means you can destroy the filibuster or do other things through a majority vote. >> not to get too technical. if that was tried, there would be a moment where the republicans would raise an objection, in effect, to proceeding to that, and then the democrats would have to basically move to table the objection, and that's what they can do. the tabling motion would only need 50 votes, but we've never seen this move b...

Call the constitutional option. that each senate, each congress can create its own rules. and when it's by majority vote, and if it's by majority vote, that means you can destroy the filibuster or do other things through a majority vote. >> not to get too technical. if that was tried, there would be a moment where the republicans would raise an objection, in effect, to proceeding to that, and then the democrats would have to basically move to table the objection, and that's what they can do. the tabling motion would only need 50 votes, but we've never seen this move before, have we? is this a ...