Stay updated with breaking news from Take Kim. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Commenting on the recent visit of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to Russia, a nationalist Russian media outlet suggested that the "logical response" to an "Eastern NATO" formed by the Washington-Seoul-Tokyo is the creation of a Moscow-Beijing-Pyongyang alliance.
Have a cia? it's ludicrous? it just is amundsoning. >> you know, and the same, you know, conversation or interaction with reporters where he says he wouldn't use a good asset in korey if it offended kim, he talked about something else that might show a window here which is a letter. he got another letter from kim, a beautiful letter. here he is today and a few other times when he has gotten letters. >> a letter was given to me by kim jong un. and that letter was a very nice letter. with you like to see what was in that letter. >> and then we fell in love, okay. no, really he wrote me beautiful...
Terms of dealing with foreign nations. and that's both enemies and friends. so the criticality of agents, folks on the ground collecting human intelligence, a key area of intelligence collection are critical important to what we do as a nation and our security as a people. >> bruise, i'm trying to understand why -- why he would do this, why he would say i would not use what the cia thinks the best asset they have against a murderous dig particularity who threatened the annihilate the united states and is killing people, why would he do this, take kim's side i wouldn't use the best guy against ...
This statement: kim and his evil regime are responsible for unimaginable cruelty and inhumanity. no excuses or lavish praise can change that. question: why did the president take kim's word that he didn't know? >> look, the president has been very clear both in public, and i've heard him in private in the oval office, that he considers what happened to otto warmbier to be despicable and barbaric, and i think he made that clear in hanoi and made it clear subsequently. i think the best thing -- chris: let me just interrupt for a second. he says, i mean, i'm going to read you the quote back again...
This statement: kim and his evil regime are responsible for unimaginable cruelty and inhumanity. no excuses or lavish praise can change that. question: why did the president take kim's word that he didn't know? >> look, the president has been very clear both in public, and i've heard him in private in the oval office, that he considers what happened to otto warmbier to be despicable and barbaric, and i think he made that clear in hanoi and made it clear subsequently. i think the best thing -- chris: let me just interrupt for a second. he says, i mean, i'm going to read you the quote back again...