Talking Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Also within them reveals the pattern of behavior. so what i liked is while these two articles are quite concise, they also show room to put in the wrong behaviors of the president. >> were you troubled that republicans are outright avoiding the evidence and continue to argue about process? not really talking about the substance or the evidence. >> i think about what professor gerhart said. if these actions by a president of the united states are not impeachable, then nothing impeachable. i cannot imagine when asked directly, my republican colleagues on it this committee, do you think it is pro...

Arguing it's an unfair process. ainsley: they talk about how they all have the same talking process. first it was quid pro quo. they changed it to extortion now they are saying it's bribery. nancy pelosi last week was talking about how this is a prayerful decision and she talked about how it's a solemn, undertaking. and now adam schiff is using that same phrase. is he saying it's a solemn undertaking. we know that's not true. what are you hearing behind the scenes? what are democrats saying? i am hearing behind the scenes phenomenal week. brian: go to the locker room and find out what they're ...

Of what's in those two documents. so i think those who are trying to defend the president, you hear them, they're i think getting themselves in all sorts of trouble. talking process, oh, a even though the secondary source is quite credible and is verified with the primary sources say. but that is what they're doing. so there is no way to defend this. some of the members, when this first broke, those members in my view were concerned but not yet alarmed. i did speak to a republican senator who fully understands the impossible situation that they are put in. that if they get too close to the pre...

Kind of thing and then there would have to be a constitutional determination process. we are napping to figure that out. >> tucker: but your talking process. i'm trying to figure out intent. do you think that attacking a group of people on the basis of their race, as she did, should that be banned or not. >> i think it's really, really hard. we have the same question with his tweet. i think politicians would have to be separated out in a way. let's imagine that some personality set it on tv. i think there should be intimidation and a threat of violence, this is the facebook algorithm for hate ...

Would have to be a constitutional determination process. we are napping to figure that out. >> tucker: but your talking process. i'm trying to figure out intent. do you think that attacking a group of people on the basis of their race, as she did, should that be banned or not. >> i think it's really, really hard. we have the same question with his tweet. i think politicians would have to be separated out in a way. let's imagine that some personality set it on tv. i think there should be intimidation and a threat of violence, this is the facebook algorithm for hate speech, so there has to be no...