Page 50 - Task Force Found News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Thats all. President chiu supervisor kim. Supervisor kim thank you. Amendment. Im familiar but i just want to supervisor olague i thought it was going to be distributed. Supervisor kim if someone can give me a copy that will be great. Ill say a couple of things. You know, i was hesitant a couple of weeks ago about including 120 to 150, not because i dont think we should calculate it but i was curious as to how we would calculate it. When we build housing for 120 and below there are mechanisms where developers are required to build at this rate and their actual set kind of guidelines on how tha...

You would bifurcate the complaint and handle the one as improper governmental activities and the other parts a sunshine violation. But i just want to be sure that people have enough information to go on the sunshine complaint, but you wouldnt necessarily reveal who the underlying complainant was. You would necessarily have to reveal who the respondent was. Its an interesting point. Sorry. I wonder what the staff thinks on that . Because the staff cant initiate a complaint either on its own awareness or it can say we heard about it from x, but were going to erase x and issue a complaint . First...

I wanted to thank his former seiu local 250 ac activist colleagues kathy lip scom for watching out for him so long but other activists like tab, eileen, his susan, carl, and the whole pride at Work Community for really making sure he was cared for in his last days as well. I wanted to say that i had tremendous respect for him as an organizer but especially as a person with a long view of movement building. And i wanted÷apx . To ask if i cd also be added on the in memoriamium for howard but also for farley. He had a wonderful memorial last night in the green money. Listens of 91. 7 fm and the ...

So no one is making up a random phrase or arbitrarily putting this label on. This is how we define it. Again i think it is sending a that were not going to were say that say two teachers living together in a household are not really middle income. We just dont feel comfortable referring to them as middle income. I think it sends a very bad message. Colleagues i suggest that we reject this amendment or at least that portion of the vote. President chiu any further discussion . Okay. Amendment. Clerk calvillo supervisor avalos, aye. Supervisor campos, aye. Supervisor campos, aye. President chiu,...

Were talking about. Okay. Anyway, it could possibly go there. Somewhere in that range. I think on the chapter 2 question, i would probably not change the burden. I think the standard of proof and burden to be kind of makes sense. That is what the whole basis of the chapter 2 versus 3 thing was. I think i would be better with three positive votes needed to make a finding that there was a violation. So even if it requires three votes to find a violation, you can still hold the person to the burden, if they didnt meet their burden, then you go the other way. Although it does play out in the same ...