any moment now the supreme court could issue a ruling about a long used abortion medication that will have far reaching impacts in this country. justices are up against a midnight deadline. we re on top of it, plus a major misfire, a russian warplane mistakenly drops a bomb on russia. the bomb so powerful it blew up car onto a roof. this happening is vladimir putin s war pushes ukraine closer to the west president zelensky now accepting an invitation to this summer s nato summer and the canadian cargo caper thieves make off with $15 million worth of gold and valuables from toronto s airport. and investigators are stumped, recovering all the major developing stories and more coming in right here to cnn news, central. a blockbuster decision is expected at any moment about how this cancer country handles cristo. that s the pill most commonly used for inducing at home abortions and for treating miscarriages. supreme court set the deadline of 11:59 p.m. eastern time tonight to iss
they described as the grim impact one year after the lockdown. there is a re ort one year after the lockdown. there is a report in one year after the lockdown. there is a report in the one year after the lockdown. there is a report in the white one year after the lockdown. there is a report in the white paper - one year after the lockdown. there is a report in the white paper that i is a report in the white paper that has been is a report in the white paper that has been prepared that says on the whole has been prepared that says on the whole i has been prepared that says on the whole i think there is an 8% rise of adults whole i think there is an 8% rise of adults who whole i think there is an 8% rise of adults who said that they have been suffering adults who said that they have been suffering mental distress during this, suffering mental distress during this, 10% suffering mental distress during this, 10% of adults who have said they have this, 10% of
former speaker nancy pelosi is threatening to dredge it up. gingrich reporters say getting information from the house ethics investigation would be at the least unethical. congresswoman pelosi says she s only talking about what s already on the record. you can decide whether it matters. cnn s jim acosta asked the candidate about it yesterday in new york. we turned over a million pages of material. we had a huge report. the total 83 charges were repudiated as false. the one mistake we made was a letter written by a lawyer that i didn t read carefully. keeping them honest. mr. gingrich isn t telling the whole story about the house investigation back then. it s complicated but in a nutshell they wanted to know if gingrich used money from tax exempt organizations to fund college courses that he taught and used, by his own admission, to further his political agenda. here s the time line, shortly after the rival filed the complaint, gingrich hired a washington lawyer who wrote
conservative candidates gingrich is up 16 points in a new poll from winthrop university. gingrich is gaining ground on romney in new hampshire, which is romney s home turf. bubbling back into the present, former speaker nancy pelosi is threatening to dredge it up. gingrich reporters say getting information from the house ethics investigation would be at the least unethical. congresswoman pelosi says she s only talking about what s already on the record. you can decide whether it matters. cnn s jim acosta asked the candidate about it yesterday in new york. we turned over a million pages of material. we had a huge report. the total 83 charges were repudiated as false. the one mistake we made was a letter written by a lawyer that i didn t read carefully. keeping them honest. mr. gingrich isn t telling the whole story about the house investigation back then. it s complicated but in a nutshell they wanted to know if gingrich used money from tax exempt organizations to fund col
threatening to dredge it up. gingrich reporters say getting information from the house ethics investigation would be at the least unethical. pelosi says she s only talking about information already on the record. they asked the candidate about it yesterday. we turned over a million pages of material. we had a huge report. the total 83 charges were repudiated as false. the one mistake we made was a letter written by a lawyer that i didn t read carefully. mr. gingrich isn t telling the whole story about the house investigation back then. it s complicated but they wanted to know if he used money from tax exempt organizations to fund college courses that he taught and used, by his own admission, to further his political agenda. shortly after the rival filed the complaint, gingrich hired a washington lawyer who wrote two material letters to the ethics committee. gingrich signed the first letter and approved the second. both contained statements that were false. gingrich was te