Coverage of national and international news, including breaking stories. Question, will any of these claims stick without providing tangible evidence . I think thats the question everyone is asking. Its interesting because shes kind of going back and forth. She says well, i heard the tape, but i dont have the tape and i think thats the issue. I mean, shes going back to, you know, president trumps days working on the aparen tigs and you know, we remember his days when he was on the apprentice, that infamous access Hollywood Tape that had such a huge impact on the campaign. This probably wont stick unless something is released but i think something i want to really stress is omarosa is not the First White House aide to turn on a president. We had Scott Mcclellan with bush and i think the difference here is how, you know, how people have how sources have said that she was treated so poorly when she left the white house and even during her time at the white house. Her role was considered n
the president. i talked to omarosa yesterday. she loves the the president and the president s family. and i don t think there s anything in those tapes that are going to be explosive or nefarious but i don t like the notion if it is true i didn t ask her if it is or it isn t. i don t like the notion that people are taping him. kevin, first is scaramucci right saying there s probably nothing explosive on those recordings because we would have heard about it by now? well, i mean people have been recording him now for quite some time. look, with regards to omarosa i think this is someone who has proven over the course of her career to have a political reality, television show type of personality in which she s been able to stay relevant but i want to speak to what julia mentioned in terms of the tension within the administration previously from the campaign to when it became the administration and now into the first term and that is there is this inherent tension between folks who wer