Live Breaking News & Updates on The Public Eye About Trump
Stay updated with breaking news from The public eye about trump. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Case scenario that situation, let s say judge gorsuch was confirmed subsequently president trump had the worst possible outcome of that investigation, he was said to have colluded with russia, he s impeached or thrown out of office because of having been an agent of a foreign power, for the length of time that judge gorsuch is on the court for the rest of his natural life, that affects everything he does as a justice. if this were a five-year appointment or two-year appointment i would haven t said that. on the filibuster plan, how do you think that s going to work? will you be able to slow down or stop the nomination. gorsuch, despite the pundits who fell for all this nice erudite humorous folksy stuff, he didn t impress our colleagues. his refusal to answer questios,s is a muslim ban a simple question about whether or not a musl ....
That is the national enquirer s line right now and honestly it s consistently been a window into where this white house is at, believe it or not. the national enquirer has been propping up this presidency on the supermarket wracks of america and now they have decided that the investigation can be ended because trump caught the spy and it was michael flynn. if you want to know what throwing somebody under the bus looks like, before it s news, it s right here. ....
None of it worked. the art of the deal is out the window, or at least it doesn t work in washington. but their second problem is even worse. trump campaigned as a populist against the democratic and republican establishments. everything he has done has been hard right. so this bill, what was the number one motivation for this bill? to reduce taxes on the wealthiest people by a huge amount. the average tax break for the top 1% of there, .1%, would be over $200,000. and that break would force people to pay more, senior citizens to have huge increases, opioid treatment gone, medicaid cut. if they keep doing that, they re going to fail because the country is not hard right. trump didn t win as a hard right person but pence and all the others have pushed them a hard right direction. if you look at the budget they introduced, even republicans said it s dead on arrival. if they do tax reform and tax reform means tax cuts just for the rich or almost predominantly for the rich they re going to ....
well, we ll threaten them, we ll run people against you. that s what president trump said. then he tried his other technique, we ll walk it away and leave it on your shoulders. none of it worked. the art of the deal is out the window, or at least it doesn t work in washington. but their second problem is even worse. trump campaigned as a populist against the democratic and republican establishments. everything he has done has been hard right. so this bill, what was the number one motivation for this bill? to reduce taxes on the wealthiest people by a huge amount. the average tax break for the top 1% of there, .1%, would be over $200,000. and that break would force people to pay more, senior citizens to have huge increases, opioid treatment gone, medicaid cut. if they keep doing that, they re going to fail because the country is not hard right. trump didn t win as a hard right person but pence and all the others have pushed them a hard right direction. if you look at the budget they ....
And if they are willing to say repeal is off the table, we ve said all along we ll sit down and try to, we think the aca is a good bill, we could make it better, we have some ideas of how the make it better, maybe they do, too, but they have to take repeal off the table and i think they ve seen, learned the hard way, how bad repeal is, but two other things, one other thing, rachel. this seems to be indicative, it s a metaphor for the administration how they behaved on this, a, incompetence. totally incompetent. i can t believe they introduced this bill and had so many of their own congress members against it from the get go. you don t do that on a major bill. if i have a major proposal to introduce i talk to bernie sanders and elizabeth warren. i talk to my joe manchin and mark warner and say what do you think? then they try the old technique well, we ll threaten them, we ll run people against you. that s what president trump said. then he tried his other technique, we ll walk it ....