Live Breaking News & Updates on Thing Nonabstract Argument
Stay updated with breaking news from Thing nonabstract argument. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Need. i argue that this is a strategic need now. they have done these things and need to take resources and they could change the supply change from the entire electronics industry forever. how will they do that? if they took there was a proposal, very, very strong proposal that apple should pay a dividend to the shareholders because they have all this cash then don t know what to do with it. they should pay 5% was the proposal of their moneys of the $5 billion. that s such an extraordinary amount of money compared to the nothing that has been put into anything in the supply chain for china. that amount of money in a foundation could change everything about how the relationship between america and china in the entire electronics industry, it could actually pave the way to make thing nonabstract argument, jobs in america if something like that changed the terms of the game you could talk about what america s role could be in ....
thursday night we saw mitt romney, he took the gloves off and did great at the debate. but before then, he had been flattering. it was newt gingrich who really was the power player and i think that there was a lot of hunger in south carolina primary and in general to see somebody who could go toe to toe with barack obama. i think that also fueled it. between want to see somebody can have that matchup in november. that s clearly the source of a lot of his appeal. in fact, his i think his main campaign selling point is he stump speech line about i will challenge obama to 95 lincoln/douglass debate and i will even let him use a teleprompter. that argument is it is hard to sell that argument if why you do very well like thursday night. sort of self-refuting going around saying the reason you should elect your nominee is how great i am as a debater and had a really bad debate. i think that thursday night, really helped romney a lot ....
I think that s what everyone you know, the black and white argument, the good we focus on, not the dirty underbelly but his overall philosophy of looking for americans don t want to look backwards. americans want to look forward. and i think that with these manufacturing jobs you look at how in the article making tonight america and you could buy between you know, between this is one pack of a level one job you can never, you know, escape and get out of and move ahead just because the evering seg tore is so fundamentally changed. i think it is much bigger than that. i think it is fundamental shift in education within this country that we got to get back. that s the argument. number 26 in the entire world, world economic forum, america s 26th in education now. when you hear people this is an argument you hear across political spectrum particularly among the sort of establishment davos make this argument. the problem in america in education and we don t trade when you hea ....
Actually you are talking about celebrating the destruction of the unions and celebrating the kind of oppression of workers that this country is proud to say is not part of its record. it is really an extraordinary argument when you think about it. how central do you think it is when you think about the economic future of the country? labor movement and labor standards reinvigorating the labor movement. that s the middle class. middle class is so important and so endangered. labor movement seen that the middle class has grown, jobs that what wages and conditions and everything else. you know, dow jones averages, close to 13,000, people are saying that s great. it is great. great for those in the 1% or 2% or 3%. reflect america. a different economy. and it now reflect it is multinationals. it is what the people who have money to invest you capital gains and pay taxes like romney and 14.5%, warren buffettt you know, tax right. they are making money based on the labor of people in ....