Stay updated with breaking news from Think jeremy. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Close and so, i do think jeremy absolutely hit it, which is where is the balance here and how much are these family members urging, if any, are there any back door communications between i think that is potentially problematic. the thing is, if it s jared kushner, obviously he s in the middle of an investigation right now. i think we can understand that one. i m not justifying it. i m saying that if it were just jared kushner then you could say, okay, well, obviously there s a russia investigation going on. this is going to be complicated until it s cleared up. that doesn t account for the other dozen or so that are in there. this is not just a problem with a son-in-law, this is a widespread systematic problem and again it goes to the heart of national security. it goes to people that may be seeing classified information that don t have the right to see classified information and it is a hell of a lot more dangerous to america s national security, the possibilities the secretary of ....
Really are on two different levels, though aren t they? one is building an empire for 21st century, at least an economic empire, the other is a disrupter. you could argue russia is on the decline and that makes them dangerous. you could argue that china is on the rise and that makes them dangerous but also potentially an opportunity. this is the briefing you hated more than any other? every year the late winter and early spring would roll around and they d organize this briefing on capitol hill and you have two to three hours of the senior members of the president s national security team testifying before congress about all of the threats around the world and that would regularly lead to questions in the briefing about whether or not we re doing enough to protect the country, about whether or not the president adequately factored in all of these challenges. not a fun day to be in the briefing. maybe bring raj out. time to break the glass in case of emergency, here s raj. jer ....
With a geopolitical overlay. and i say well, we ve seen this movie before in the christian world between the protestants and the catholics and the wars of the reformation. how long did they last? about 150 years. buckle up there the middle east. admiral james stavridis, thank you. jeremy, what should we expect this morning when we re having the administration come to hill and talk about the threat assessments across the globe. it s an annual event. i think the phrase you ll hear is near peer competitor. they ll warn about china and russia and their advanced capabilities in cyber and space. and the question is will this administration be prepared to say that russia is a significant threat that they re engaging in cyber hacking and meddling not just in our democracy but elections around the world. far different, though, the power dynamic, china and russia ....
We know his sister has been dealing with a chinese in the way they re promising visas in exchange for investments in the company. there are a couple of situations in which it s pretty obvious that there is a conflict that at least needs to be examined. that is the real double standard. you cannot imagine a diplomat or officer with that kind of obvious financial conflict continuing to be in the situation where they re reading the president s daily briefings. jeremy, help me out here, the fbi warns the white house. these are your problems. we have these problems. this guy has beaten up his ex-wife and abused the other ex-wife as well. they pass that information on to the white house and the white house does nothing about it. now we ll play a clip in a second. the white house is blaming the fbi. isn t it incumbent on the white house then to look at the things that are stopping the security clearance and either clarifying ....
With us tonight. mark, your thoughts on what you ve seen tonight. well, i m not deterred from my opinion that deborah bradley is most definitely the suspect whether intentional or otherwise. i think she was responsible for the disappearance and most probably the death of lisa irwin. i don t think jeremy is i don t think jeremy is involved at at all. i think he is i think he is an unwitting pawn of deborah bradley that is going along with her innocence routine. and really the scam and really the scam that s going on here. why? why? because you because you know, you heard phil, he has no horse in this race. he says she he says she did not indicate deception. well, when with all due respect to somebody that worked for the cia and dealt with terrorists, that s fine. but you observe them for hours days, weeks months sometimes years. you understand how they are on and off camera, on and off interrogation. and this interrogation wasn t an ....