off or do something. ashley: the suspect was arrested and is facing charges of sexual battery. things like anytime fitness, you have a faub key, you have to swipe yourself in. she probably didn t know or think he was going to do this to her and she let him inside. as a female, you can never be too safe or cautious of anyone. i guarantee you she did not know he was going to do this. watching this video scares me to death, this terrifies me, this situation could have turned out worst. she may not have gotten away and been able to call the police. these situations happen every single day. todd: being a woman, i can t experience that, but i have two girls and worry about the future they will have in this america we have now, where you can t do common act of courtesy like letting someone in. this lady is a body woulder, she is at peak physical performance, what if she wasn t, would we have a different story. this is criminals in this day and age feeling emboldened because ther
chatted with my friend and colleague chris hayes about my new book prequel. it was a life taping of his podcast in front of an audience a town hall in new york. it was tons of fun. we shot it as a tv show. it is now available to watch, to stream on peacock. the easiest way to find it is to go to the peacock up on your tv, on your phone, or on your computer. just search maddow. the top results should be this little illustration with our faces on it. if you click on that, you can watch that really cool thing. peacock, it s up there right now. that does it for us tonight. now it s time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. good evening, lawrence. rachel, i m so happy that the lawyer s guilt has been able to organize with our coworkers here. as a member of the guild myself, for longer than some of these new members have been alive, i mean, i m very happy to see them teaming up. and, rachel, before you go, this episode of the last word tonight, i mean, you know what? don
good to be back with you in this second hour of chris jansing reports. ahead, the high intensity at times down right contentious hearing testing the limits of the first amendment, as a lawyer for donald trump fights a gag order in the federal election case. will trump s rhetoric win out or the risk to witnesses? we ve got clues from inside the courtroom. developing overseas, israel releases footage it says shows hostages and a hamas tunnel at the hospital that s become a symbol of the war itself. and what we re learning about heavy fighting happening at another hospital in gaza. the 44,000 hours of footage from the january 6th attack being made public as one republican senator pushes yet another conspiracy theory about that day. we ve got a fact check. and he s been dubbed the oppenheimer of our age. the truly wild shakeup involving the ai guru, who compares the scale of his work to the manhattan project. our nbc news reporters are following all of the latest developm
amounts to a $12 balloon and along those lines, jonathan, u.s. fighter jets intercepting russian aircraft flying near hawaii on tuesday issue the second interception in two days, norad downplaying it saying this is the second one, it occurs regularly and not seen as a threatener is activity seen as proactive. i have a different take, jonathan, do you have any doubt adversaries like russia or china are testing us because of joe biden s absolute factlessness and weakness on the world stage? you have to look at totality of the circumstances like when we re doing investigation of case. look at the reality of what is upon haing right now. there is half dozen of intrusions on alaska alone by russia. those are years when it is just
gone to the fbi and brought them threats or referred threats to them that they were worried about, and the fbi has taken them and said they re investigating but they haven t really heard back in many cases, most cases. what, if anything, peter, can you tell us about what kind of people are making these threats? i mean, i know you re dealing with a large number here. but have you been able to sample their backgrounds, where are they from, what do they do, beyond just their motivations? so we you know, many of these things are anonymous. and we were able to, for example, identify a gender in 500 plus of these messages, it s overwhelmingly male, four out of five of the messages where we were able to identify the gender, were obviously male. we found a substantial number of these cases, the threatener was contacting officials in a state