Page 29 - Torture Program News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Those programs, that is where the cia won't to help develop what they specifically called a torture program. they captured two psychologists who help service members survive torture techniques. and, basically, they asked the sigh kolgs to do that training in reverse. to come up with ways not to survive that kind of torture, but to come up with ways to impose that kind of torture. james mitchell and bruce drezen had no experience in intelligence work. they had no experience in al-qaida or any related terrorist groups. they have no relevant cow e

Obama and mccain, that accountability was going to come. so in those last couple weeks, they got right with nosenko. they got right with him in the last few weeks of his life. and now, it turns out, 6 1/2 years later, this is as right as we're ever going to get with any of the rest of them. no prosecutions, no named officers, no named policymakers who signed off on it. even jessen and mitchell. they turned themselves into a company and collected $81 million in taxpayer money for their services in designing the torture program. plus they got a guarantee of legal immunity if they ever needed it....

Cia subcontracted this interrogation program out to a company run by two psychologists. they didn't have any specific training in interrogations. they didn't have any specific training in al qaeda. they made $80 million off of this contract. is this typical of the way that the cia operates? >> well, i don't know that it's typical of the way the cia operates. it's certainly typical of the way the united states operated in the first couple years after 9/11. when i did my book, i talked to condoleezza rice and she essentially said to me that for the first two or three years after 9/11, the admini...

Commit errors as we obviously did against international law and our own domestic law in conducting this torture program. >> mika, what's your reaction to the decision to release it? >> i think this decision has been a long time coming. they've been working for eight months to redact sensitive information and this was an extensive investigation, five years, 6,000 pages, career investigators. they put a lot of time and effort into this, and dianne feinstein is the one to most likely give them a fair shake at this. >> let's listen to what they said about this. >> i think this is a terrible idea. ...

Worldwide. we heard from defense secretary hagel who left iraq he said he was concerned about the realization of the report but also went on to say she'she's satisfied they redacted all they could i'm joined by richard engel. it would seem to me -- senator johnson said the same thing. a lot of details in the report have already been leaked. so what more will we learn in just a few hours? before we get to that i think it's important understand what this report actually is. already we're seeing it divided over political lines. republicans attacking it. the democrats saying they like it. others s...