Unbunk Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That's already happening. you are still stopping here. >> i am not. the government is arguing that placing her with an immigration sponsor would allow her if she wish to consult with someone of the decision. that's not the purpose of the state by pass procedures. >> judge, the clock is ticking. >> it is. >> it seems to me mashe made th in the pregnancy, the clock is ticking and you are suggesting that she should have waited to have a sponsor appointed who she mayor may not have consulted in making this decision. >> okay, i am a judge, i am not making the policy decisions. my job is to decide w...

She would not be forced to talk to but she could consult with if she wants the decision facing her. we have to analyze this, first is a minor and then for me, the first question was what's the precedent? the precedent on point from the supreme court is there is no case on exact points so you do what you do in all case and you reason by analogy from the closest thing on point. what's the closest body of long point? the parental consent decisions of the supreme court where they repeatedly upheld parental consent laws over the on jubjec of the centers who's going to delay the procedures up to sev...

From casey's, has this phrase. minors benefits from consultation about abortion, talking about consultations. >> you are adding a requirement here. beyond the state of texas requirements that there would be some sponsors show who may or may not be consulted of this decision and the clock is i can thing on her pregnancy. >> a couple of things there, senator, you said you are adding. i am not adding. i am a judge. the policy is being made by others. i am deciding whether the policy is consistent of supreme court pressing. there are two things to look at in this context. first, it is the governme...

And meaning of the 14th amendment, which guaranteed equal protection. the supreme court in the strouder versus west virginia case in 1880, jury selection case, had said, what is this amendment but that the law shall be the same for the black and the white? and the supreme court, unfortunately, backtracked from that clear principle in the plesey decision in a horrific decision which allowed separate but eke result. then brown v. board corrected that in 1954. of course, corrected it on paper. it's still decades and we're still seeking to achieve racial equality, the long march for racial equalit...

And she has no one to talk to and she's pregnant. that's a difficult situation and i specifically recognize and try to understand that and as a judge, not thepolicymaker. i try to understand if it is consistent with the supreme cou court's precedent. i did the best i could. some people disagree with those precedents and think that those statutes are not allowed. i had to take casey in completely. >> some other questions, please. >> it is an important question. >> it is a critical question. >> i did my level best in an emergency posture so i had basically two days to do this case. >> 2-1 unbunk...