Under Nadler News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Nadler wanted out of the independent counsel statute. they got it. the person in charge was the attorney general. they were giving the pass by mueller to make the decision and they made it, despite whatever department procedures and rules might have been in place for constitutional issues regarding whether or whether or not you can indict a sitting president. it did not factor in and they were very clear. >> one point that is clear, if you can't indict a sitting president, why do you have a special counsel to indict a sitting president? they are supposed to decide, and they should have ended t...

Emphatic about the issue of obstruction where he contradicts the deputy attorney general which he did today. and that is why nadler doesn't want to call him to testify. they have their narrative. why doesn't mueller want to testify? there's a thousand and one questions to ask this man, from who he hired, why he hired him, why he hired hillary clinton, the dossier on the real russians. he said he's not going to pass judgment, on the russians who are indicted, their guilt or innocence. it's such a huge abomination, i think this whole thing was orchestrated. i think he didn't want to testify and ...

Cheering for impeachment based on nothing. we will write the entire time. watch this. >> if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. we did not, however, make a determination as to whether thev president did commit a crime. the constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. >> sean: number one, mr. mueller doesn't know the law. he's basically full ofne, crap. the special counsel's regulations are very clear. according to the law, remember, got rid of the independ...

Who is now all but cheering for impeachment based on nothing. and it, they were right the entire time. >> if we had had the confidence that the president had not committed the crime, we would have said so. we did not however make a determination as to whether the president committed a crime. the constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. >> sean: number one, mr. mr. mueller doesn't know the law. according to the law, we got rid of the independent counsel because people like jerrold nadler didn't want the cannon s...

You don't like but it might be a high crime or misdemeanor in the context of impeachment. it just so happens that the current chair of the judiciary committee, the one for starting the impeachment process, sees things in very similar terms. >> crimes and impeachable offenses are two different things. they're just two different tests. we can't depend on the mueller investigation for this. the mueller investigation, number one, we don't know when it's ending, despite lots of rumors. number two, it's focused on specific crimes. and we have to focus much more broadly. >> under nadler, the house ju...