Stay updated with breaking news from Us versus them. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
there are no rules currently. they said that they individually decided how to interpret the standards that they have tried to set in the past. you re right, congress, of course, would take this out. this is a partisan moment. there is some interest, at least, to hear from republicans in alaska, it is conceivable that the senate with bare democratic majorities, it seems very likely would pass the republican house. a lot of shouting about this issue, and i couldn t imagine that legislation will pass anytime soon. this issue is it will become partisan to have a consensus way to approach an issue that is, frankly, concerned about parties depending on which justices are there. it is just going to be part of the perpetual back and forth, us versus them, nature of washington politics these days. why are there no rules? i don t think it goes far ....
Joe biden did not win the election in 2020. so, their credibility is shot anyways, but it is up to democrats to make the argument in 2024. i want to share what former head of the congressional budget office, peter or zag, said in an interview that i did with him earlier today about another lane that could be taken here. watch this. the first test, clearly, is to cut a deal, and that should happen. but, we are getting close enough here, we need to start playing through the alternatives. i think relative to default, or prioritization, if we are in that position, i would invoke the 14th amendment, and ignore the debt limit. so, the 14th amendment basically says, ignore the debt limit, and democrats, the government, can keep on trucking. do you think that is a possibility here, jason? anything is possible. stephanie, this was part of the kabuki theater everybody is doing right now. everybody becomes a constitutional scholar, everybody has an economics degree, and economics ph. d. f ....
That the senate with bare democratic majorities, it seems very likely would pass the republican house. a lot of shouting about this issue, and i couldn t imagine that legislation will pass anytime soon. this issue is it will become partisan to have a consensus way to approach an issue that is, frankly, concerned about parties depending on which justices are there. it is just going to be part of the perpetual back and forth, us versus them, nature of washington politics these days. why are there no rules? i don t think it goes far beyond common sense to think, well, a chief justice wife should not be paid millions of dollars from a law firm. a big fat developer who is politically active shouldn t be taking on multi hundred thousand dollar vacations, and you shouldn t be getting into ....
Will bear chance of reaching a deal with the directors or actors. go back to that doesn t, some 2000 a strike. they reached a deal with the directors in the middle of the negotiations with the rioters. that brought them back to the table. there s hope that to happen this time. i think the last several months, they will reach an inevitable compromise. maybe in the fall. people want to go back to work. her body out there who loves those late matches, sorry guys. you are stuck watching me. because charles, thank you so much. always good to see you and in person on here in l.a.. when we come, back they say all politics is local, but we have to state house reporters standing by with an update on the cultural wars in texas and missouri. when the 11th hour continues. ontinues ay suitcases come in many colors. so you can find your color. colors. choices. happiness. away. it is time to get local, ....