Uva Rape Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Uva rape case. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Uva Rape Case Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Profile and this can go back to the uva rape case falsely reported at stone, the new york city subway system. i think it s important to put both things in perspective while liberals sometimes rush to judgment on the other side. joining me now charles blow, l.j. grammarson, and john mcwarter and contributing editor for the atlantic. it s great to have you all here. l.z., let me begin with you. we heard there was so much attention given to this one case and not nearly enough on the shootings in chicago or the other hate crimes borne out in the country. but you ought to recognize two things. ....
Or the uva rape case that rolling stone wrote about. they have been granted anonymity by the media, and that anonymity allows the light to persist, and across to people and direct their lives. my question is, i should be about the media to go along this, why should be granted one side anonymity? i think this is really incumbent on the journalists here to be extremely comfortable in their betting processes, and obviously the uva story and rolling stone was a huge example of an anonymous source gone awry, but it is really on the journalist to do extensive vetting to cooperate and fact check, and those were failures. not saying this is a totally perfect process and that anonymous sources ever go wrong, never exaggerating, but the instances where they are telling the truth are those instances that allow things like this, this #metoo movement, this reckoning of us learning but the ....
Years ago, wouldn t you say, kind of hard to respond unless i know who the person is? there is a kind of unfairness about that, and i think we should be honest enough to admit it.a you can focus on that unfairness, but you could focusi on the fact that this is not ont isolated incident of one accusation against al franken. it s one of which there is photographic evidence, there are people on the record, there is cooperation from various sources. if this were one sort of random person who we had no reason to believe based on other circumstances, i might be more upset about this. tucker: a fair point. let me agree with you. it does seem like a pattern, absolutely. the reason i am bringing it up now, in light of the al franken story, is because we have seen other examples where random people with no pattern at all have been accused of felonies anonymously. thinking of the duke rape caseee or the uva rape case that rolling stone wrote about. both of them were lies. in both cases, the ....
And all he did was attack her instead of attack the issue. what he was getting at, and perhaps his style was a little more aggressive than you would like, what he was getting at is how unfair it is for the media to hear an accusation that has absolutely no evidence and no witnesses behind it and splash it across the front page of the new york times or up on a television screen without even telling the public the viewers and the readers that this accusation comes with no evidence. that s what happened with all due respect. that was the same thing that the folks over at bill cosby bill koss beau s camp said the same thing. and then you see what has rolled out now. sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong. their wrong. think of the injustice, the duke la crosse case, the uva rape case, lives are ruined and then the truth comes out. to say there is no corroborating evidence is not true. in many of these cases there is corroborating evidence in the ....
Journalism to lump sean penn in with them. you and gayle have both talked about this robin hood-like figure, it s such a glamorization, but still looking at heinous charges, murder and tons of other capital offenses. i don t like that glamorization. rolling stone coming off the virginia/uva rape case, they have a credibility issue they re still trying to rebuild. i doint think this does them any favors. he was proven guilty. he was in prison. and i criticize this if it s done with a politician, but giving this criminal essentially veto power of the article. rolling stone said he doesn t exercise it, but it was submitted to him in advantage. rolling stone should have never agreed to that. they already have a credibility issue. they have lawsuits against them because of the uva story. so they shouldn t be denigrating their journalistic responsibility any further. if you read the article, sean penn uses it as a platform for ....