Stay updated with breaking news from Vehement denial. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Staff. this is a significant position. it s a significant, huge role in the white house. it s all about figuring out what the president should see and when he should see it. whether it s executive orders. porter would be vetting legal documents as well, and over the last many months, particularly once reince priebus was no longer in that chief of staff role, i think his profile in the white house and his portfolio certainly grew over these last months because he had the full faith of john kelly who, of course, is still now calling him a pretty good guy and saying that he s an honorable person. mj, you ve spoken to porter s two ex-wives who allege that he emotionally and physically abused them. what s interesting, though, is that you said especially in light of porter s vehement denial that any of this is true. he used the word vile to ....
Under oath? nice. sad. trump s lawyer said the usa today misleading statement in august, he put out the word afterwards, i never was doing this. john dowd who obviously came in around the time he started speaking more for the trump legal lel team because jake sekulow had been thought to be doing a botched job. he says he never considered firing bob mueller. now you go back and look at everything and you say what can we believe and also was this held so closely that dowd didn t know? are there people in the white house that don t know the things that run through the consideration in the president s head? who obviously tells huckabee sanders to say it didn t happen? do they just assume that s what the message it? here s the thing. he did order the firing. > the new york times like any responsible media gives advance notice, we are going to write this story. if this really was untrue, where are the white house denials in the original story, the vehement denial from mcgahn ....
Now you go back and look at everything and you say what can we believe and also was this held so closely that dowd didn t know? are there people in the white house that don t know the things that run through the consideration in the president s head? who obviously tells huckabee sanders to say it didn t happen? do they just assume that s what the message it? here s the thing. he did order the firing. > the new york times like any responsible media gives advance notice, we are going to write this story. if this really was untrue, where are the white house denials in the original story, the vehement denial from mcgahn this happened? where are the statements? they don t examine is. trump s legal team is studying a 1990s era court ruling in in order to avoid a possible interview between the president and special counsel. this is again against cross currents of truth or lying. ....
Happen. it can t. but a cease-fire can and did. it s not the dumbest idea i ve ever heard but it s pretty close. reporter: president trump also insisting sunday that he strongly pressed president putin about russian meddling during friday s meeting, but not indicating if he accepted putin s vehement denial saying only, i ve already given my opinion. i think it was russia, but i think it was probably other people and/or countries and i see nothing wrong with that statement. nobody really knows. reporter: this after the russian foreign minister said friday that trz heard and accepts putin s denial, a claim that the president s aides denied on sunday after initially declining to answer questions about the matter during a gaggle aboard air force one. the president absolutely did not believe the denial of president putin. reporter: president trump yesterday ze clairing that now is the time to move forward, to work constructively with russia, ....
Forming an impenetrable cyber security unit with russia to guard against the threat. i m sure vladimir putin could be of enormous assistance in that effort since he s doing the hacking. reporter: facing backlash, president trump reversing course 12 hours later tweeting, the fact that president putin and i discussed a cyber security unit doesn t mean i think it can happen. it can t, but a cease-fire can and did. it s not the dumbest idea i ve ever heard, but it s pretty close. reporter: president trump also insisting sunday that he strongly pressed president putin about russian meddling during friday s meading, but not indicating if he accepted putin s vehement denial saying only, i ve already given my opinion. i think it was russia, but i think it was probably other people and/or countries and i see nothing wrong with that statement. nobody really knows. this after the russian foreign minister said friday that president trump heard and accepts putin s denial, a claim ....