Page 2 - Versus Casey News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> activists are bracing for a new battle over one of the nation's starkest political divides. >> this case is about whether the supreme court is going to adhere to an almost 50-year precedent of respecting the individual liberty to make decisions about pregnancy. >> unborn babies are human beings, and they should be protected as any human being would. >> in arguments on wednesday, chief justice john roberts signaled he might uphold the mississippi law without explicitly overturning roe. >> if it is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time. >> he appeared to be alone as other mem...

0 than 8500. fair to say, pam bozanich is not one of them. >> life in prison for those two is just fine. i hope they live a long, long life. this sunday, the fate of roe v. wade. >> life is so precious, and these babies have a chance now. >> the supreme court signals it's ready to allow an abortion ban at 15 weeks. is it going to weaken or overturn roe v. wade? >> is it really an issue about choice? why is 15 weeks not enough time? >> lawyers defending roe argue that fetal viability should remain the standard. >> mississippi's ban on abortion two months before viability is flatly unconstitut...

On this or is this binary? >> well, it was clear both from the solicitor general's argument and the argument by our lawyer in the courtroom as well as granted by the state of mississippi that you can't uphold mississippi's law without overturning roe versus wade. there will be no stopping ground. they'll say 15 weeks in mississippi now. mississippi passed a six-week ban and they'll be back in court and they've made their argumentsal read they the six-week ban should be upheld. as you pointed out, about half the states in the united states are poised to ban abortion entirely. so what has made t...

Is striking as well. nothing could be more important than in this particularly moment than health care, yet we had two justices willing to demolish the aca. >> that is particularly striking. what does the supreme court's decision tell us about the security of the aca going forward on that central issue? >> so i think this is much debate. earlier today on msnbc are republicans going to reel it back, this is baked in and these entitlements will endure because people have expectations to them. i think that's probably right but we also said in 1992 after planned parenthood versus casey reaffirmed ...

Still had two justices willing to demolish the aca. >> that is particularly striking. what does the supreme court's decision tell us about the security of the aca going forward on that central issue? >> i think this is a matter of much debate, earlier today on msnbc and other platforms a number of people have said that this is the end. the republicans are going to relate back. this is baked in and these entitlements will endure because people have expectations to them. i think that's probably right. we also said in 1992, after planned parenthood versus casey reinforce roe v. wade that a right ...