Versus Dickerson News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

States versus dickerson case in 2000 where the court considered whether to overturn miranda versus arizona. in that case the court, through rehnquist, specifically reaffirmed miranda, despite the fact that rehnquist had been a critic of miranda in his early daze and had written opinions critical of it. it became that -- that dickerson is similarly precedent on precede precedent, which is important going forward as you think about the calculation for a case like miranda. that's why both of those cases, planned parenthood and dickerson are cases where i would refer to them as precedent on preced...

2000 where the court considered whether to overturn miranda versus arizona or to reafifirm it. in that case through chief justice rehnquist specifically we affirmed miranda zbidespite fact he had been a critic of miranda in the early days and had written opinions of it quite critical. that dickerson case is similarly precedent on precedent which is important going forward as you think about the stare decisis calculation. that's why both of those cases, planned parenthood versus casey and dickerson are cases where i would refer to them as precedent on precedent. >> so you believe it's correctly...

Wade is an important precedent in the supreme court. it's been reaffirmed many times. it was reaffirmed in planned parenthood versus casey in 1992 when the court specifically considered whether to reaffirm it or overturn it. in that detail the three justice opinion went through all the factors, analyzed those and decided to reaffirm roe. that makes casey precedent on precedent. it's been relied on. casey itself has been cited as authority in subsequent cases. so that precedent on precedent is quite important as you think about it in this context. a similar analogy, the united states versus dic...