Wars Power Act News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> laura: hi, everyone, i'm laura ingraham. this is "the ingraham angle," great to have you with us. biden birthday collapse. what? that is the focus of tonight's angle. 81 candles for our 46th president, quite a personal accomplishment, i must say. the stars have loved celebrating democrat presidents on their birthdays. >> happy birthday to you, happy bir birthday, mr. president, happy birthday to you. . happy birthday! >> laura: biden was 19 and a half years old when that took place. this year the affair was subdued, his pals in the press having trouble finding something to celebra...

Of the convoys after they raided a trailer in alberta, guns, body armor, and a machete inside of a trailer there. back out here live in ottawa, things are not slowing down. almost getting toward the weekend again, so many people come in by wednesday night and thursday, and they stay pretty much for what is a party here, no matter how cold the temperature is. we are waiting -- the police chief of ottawa, once again, people here in the city want to know who is in charge. so as soon as we get more information, we'll bring it to you. >> john: david paisley is talking about haircuts, the prime mini...

Ought to go to war. >> so congressman garamendi, very clear here, if the president calls for action before you come back or any other representative comes back, it will be a mistake in your view? >> well, that's the kind word, mistake. it's more than a mistake. the constitution's clear here. only in an imminent threat under the war powers act does the president have the authority to go to war. otherwise, you have to come to congress and listen, you drop missiles into some country, that's an act of war under any definition. >> all right. admiral sestak, do you agree with that? if we send 200 cr...

Clear. america does not go to war without congress saying we're going to go to war. the president talked about all of those things but missed one very, very important element and that is the constitution and his responsibility to come to congress, to explain with all of the classified material, not just account unclassified material why it makes sense, why it's necessary. what the potential outcomes are, what the problems are. and then it's my responsibility as one of 535 members elected by the people of the united states to decide whether we're going to go to war or not. it's in the constitut...

Chemical weapons ban and norm. but again, i repeat, we're not considering any open-ended commitment. we're not considering a ining a on the ground approach. what we do is consider options that meet the narrow concern around chemical weapons understanding that there's not going to be a solely military solution to the underlying conflict and tragedy that's taking place in syria. >> so the phraseology during the bush years was slam-dunk. now it's high confidence. we have high confidence that civilians won't be killed in syria. is that the moral high ground? what is a limited narrow act? if you ge...