Live Breaking News & Updates on Wasnt Based On Substance
Stay updated with breaking news from Wasnt based on substance. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Powell, members took to the floor to offer impeachment resolutions, this ishe nature of separation of powers. and what really matters is not what he says about the judges, but what he says and what he does ultimately if there is a ruling. that is that is where push comes to shove. professor, let me play one more sound byte from president trump today about the idea that courts are biassed and i want to get you to essentially respond to the same question. here it is. i don t ever want to call a court biassed, so i won t call it biassed. and we haven t had a decision yet. but courts seem to be so political and it would be so great for our justice system if they would be able to read a statement and do what s right. and that has to do with a security of our country which is so important. all right. again, professor adler before we get to the substance, there s working the refs and then there ....
Seems to be getting to a position where the refs feel they re in a no-win situation. where are you on this? exactly. we re getting to the latter. those sorts of comments about a pending case are not responsible and i don t think they re helpful either. it s one thing to criticize the substance of a court s opinion, it s another thing to go after the judges and to question the legitimacy of the court s decision-making process. and the president s been doing the latter. we saw with george bush that, you know, one can express disagreement with judicial decisions about very important questions relating to national security without questioning the legitimacy of the courts and without putting judges in a position where they might feel they have to demonstrate their independence which can only compromise their decision-making. yeah, i was just going to say, stan, how concerned are you about this issue? yes, we know judges are they made it that far because there was a belief that they co ....
To, you know, he may have won the legal argument. he s found ways to himself lose a political argument that you and i were discussing this morning, if he d rolled it out in a better process, might have majority suort. there s no question. substance of this actual piece of legislation is quite popular, it extends beyond his own coaliti coalition. it s very popular. and that s one thing we have to kind of watch with trump is how are things popular with his coalition and without. you know, obama in 2015, he said when the supreme court took up the challenge to bothcare, he said they never should have taken up a case. this would be a twisted interpretation, this is while they were considering it. it s hard to tell presidents not to work the ref, that s they don t have assistant coaches like basketball coaches to pull him back. right. you heard there, stan, i thought did a good job, kareem, of reminding us, presidents have certainly shown some it s going so far as to say well, forg ....
It, and also politics that wasn t based on substance. emotional politics. it was it s more emotional and if they did have substance, they were largely advocating for policies that didn t help working class people who they counted on to vote for them. so if you re bankrupt of ideas and you re fostering anger, does donald trump hijack your party? yes he does. a lesson for democrats is to make sure that along the way, and even an upside at least engaging with the public while trump is president is there are things you can literally do in your own life to be supportive to resist him to and i think that s empowering for people. what do you do to make sure you don t the movement doesn t allow of the hijacking of the democratic party. i don t believe i actually think the real energy is not just with the base. this is these are a-political people turning out. these are millions of people who ....