Wasnt Equal Access News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That case was that congress had compiled a very extentendsive rd about the corporations and unions, generally and the political process and what the congress had found was that these corporations and unions had a kind of access to congressmen, had a kind of influence over congressmen, that changed outcomes. that was a corrupting influence, on congress. and, that was what the many, many, many thousand page record that was created before congress enacted this mccain-feingold bill, revealed, and that is what we tried to argue to the court. >> i understand the argument. but, the statute banning po...

Supporters have been trying to say she dheecontinued the polic she didn't institute, but the truth is what happened while she was dean is the third circuit court in philadelphia, federal appeals court struck down the solomon amendment and as soon as they did it. she at harvard in the 1st circuit, not bound by the third circuit decision saying you no longer have to follow the solomon amendment she nantly reverted back to an old policy that essentially hurt the military that didn't allow them full access and sessions said you didn't have to follow the 3rd circuit decision and you were in the 1st...

And she had such a problem and she worked for him and wanted to kick the military off of her campus recruiting office and she said they had equal access through this veterans and recruiting went up during my tenure and critics said thanks to the hustle of the veterans, that is why the numbers went up, she cannot take credit for that. martha: it is interesting, and, he was narrowing it down to that, how do you feel about the military, when given the opportunity to work with them you gave them the run around, he said, and she said i revere the military and he said i'm not sure, which i thought, ...

Students know that the military recruiters were going to be at harvard during that recruiting season and military recruiting went up that year, not down. so you're exactly right, that the supreme court did reject our amicas brief. again, we filed an amicas brief not attacking the constitutionality of the solomon amendment but instead saying that essentially the harvard policy complied with the solomon amendment, the supreme court rejected it 9-0, unanimously. >> but even before that the military said the law was still in effect, harvard had no right to get around it, and they should comply eve...

Equal access. isn't that right? >> senator sessions, we had gone back and done exactly what the department of defense had asked us to do prior to the time that the supreme court ruled. we had done it -- >> wait a minute. you asked them what they asked you to do after the third circuit ruled, you denied them access, they had to insist and demand that they have equal access, because the law was still in effect. you did not agree to that. you had reversed that policy and the president of the university overruled your decision, according to the internal dod documents. they say that president summe...