Stay updated with breaking news from Wasnt purposeful. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Yes, i believe so. Okay. And this is just investigation, generally making a public to of openness generally. Right . I think by august 11th, mr. Castor, i think we were talking about 2016 and burisma. The investigation generally was really early in the but do we know that Secretary Pompeo knows that . I think so. Why . Only because i think councilor breakable was briefed on all of these things. By who, by you . I think ambassador volker, by myself. Does not he testified to. I didnt know he testified. Ambassador volker. Oh, okay. He didnt testified that he briefed mr. Brechbuhl. This email to the secretary, he is talking about the statement which by the way, you said that the statement didnt go anywhere. Ambassador volker said it wasnt a good idea. Mr. Yermak said it wasnt a good idea. The secretary, it relates to a generic openness subject. Right . Yeah, i think the secretary that was on the july 25th call. Which obviously i was ....
Is that right? might be here for 46 minutes and set of 45 minutes. wasn t purposeful. you couldn t fit it in a 22 page opener. the most important statement about the subject matter at hand. the president of the united states in a direct conversation with you about the issue at hand of the president said, what you want from ukraine, mr. president? i want nothing. i want no quid pro quo. i want this new guy, brand-new guy in politics, his party just took over. i want zelensky to do the right thing. i want him to run on a do what he ran on witches deal with corruption. and you can find time to fit that in the 22 page opening statement. you know what a quid pro quo is? i do. this for that, right? looks to me like ukraine got that three times and there was no this. we didn t do anything. they didn t have to do anything. ....
These conditions. that s different than obamacare. this, to me,nd again, is all abt republicans and saying, we need apu victory. we just want to repeal and replace. we know we are getting hammered by the base for not h doing it because, as kimberly pointed out, we got the house, the senate. why did wee get rid of it? you guys that are complaining, take this and get out of here. jesse: juan, you don t have a lot of legs to stand on. obamacare imploded. juan: 60% of american stand with me,e not you, jesse. kimberly: not on watters world, they ll swim with him. jesse: is kimmel winning this, is cassidy winning bets? who is looking good? would you advise cassidy to back off or go on his show? how would you play this? kimberly: i don t particularly want to give either one of them advice, except that i think that healthy debate is always good. if it gets people talking about the issues and narrows down to some of the specifics and actual facts. the problem is there have been a l ....
The military. i think if there s complete coordination with the administration was showing this week visibly for all to see with an absolute diplomatic fight. there were no military angles. brian: general mattis and mcmaster used to wear uniform. kimberly: plane the whole document turn. they did not bring mad dog into the mix. they d h.r. mcmaster. good point. it was strategic. dana: i don t know. kimberly: relinquished back dana: i don t know if it was purposeful. it was striking. if it wasn t purposeful, it was brilliant. kimberly: put the players out there, this is their area of expertise. your starting five to make sure. i will thought it was good. juan: if you say totally destroy, i think people think oh, my god. ....
But you know who was a year? the military. i think if there s complete coordination with the administration was showing this week visibly for all to see with an absolute diplomatic fight. there were no military angles. brian: general mattis and mcmaster used to wear uniform. kimberly: plane the whole document turn. they did not bring mad dog into the mix. they d h.r. mcmaster. good point. it was strategic. dana: i don t know. kimberly: relinquished back dana: i don t know if it was purposeful. it was striking. if it wasn t purposeful, it was brilliant. kimberly: put the players out there, this is their area of expertise. your starting five to make sure. i will thought it was good. juan: if you say totally destroy, i think people think oh, my god. ....