Page 2 - Watershed Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Analyzing arguments for and against that present particular evidence and those in the united states are affirming absent and material change in the situation. no, the supreme court has never overruled a watershed case or as argued a watershed case meaning that when the justices were essentially asking her what has changed now, do you think? and i thought that was really fascinating because the answer upon being pressed was that there actually wasn't precedents for that to in a vacuum overturn a case. that's been gone almost ten years of silence which is quite vocal, and he said articulate to m...

Casey -- i wonder if it was o'connor who wrote that. i don't know. but it comes primarily from people believing that we do our jobs, we use reason, we don't look to just what's popular and that's where you see the paradox. but the problem with the super case of which we've heard three mentioned, the problem with the super case like this, the rare case, the watershed case, where people are really opposed on both sides and they really fight each other is they will be ready to say no you're just politicians, you're just political and that's what kills us as an american institution. that's what th...

Argument, for the opponents, had to be hearing that fall on deaf ears. they had to hope they would hear the chief justice make an assertion that the integrity of the court matters. they get no principaled conversation with them. it is a watershed case like this. it falls on deaf ears because is let's let the people decide. >> yeah, just caution, but don't know whether or not it fell on deaf ears with the chief, but he is so concerned about propriety, he must have cringed, i have seen them do it once, but i

0 decisis analysis and i want to give you an opportunity to respond. >> the undue burden test is not at issue. that applies to regulations, not prohibitions. the state has conceded this is a prohibition. thats the title of this law is an act to prohibit abortion after 15 weeks and the only thing that is at issue in this case is the viability line. the viability line has been workable. the lower federal courts have applied it uniformly for 50 years, the fifth circuit had no difficulty striking down this law unanimously 3-0. it has been an exceedingly workable standard. if i may return to your q...

Around -- >> and, look, if the courts rule that kupperman has to testify, this is going to be a watershed case that may say then bolton has to testify, eisenberg, all these others. then if you're saying no, you're obstructing not just the congress, but you are disobeying the courts. this week in a nutshell is a perfect example of why many people are concerned the president is trying to position himself above the law. here's why. he is saying to the united states congress i have constitutional immunity, i don't have to talk to you. and he is saying to the courts i don't have to do what you tell...