Webs E News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That's the word from the site's web provider called dream host. dream host is now fighting back after the department of justice requested information on visitors that logged in to disrupt j-20.org. not just their computer addresses but user's photos and contact details. the government claims that the website was used in the developing, planning, advertisement and organization of a violent riot in d.c. on inauguration day. the request should be enough to set off alarm bells in anybody's mind and the site's attorney says chills the right of free speech. let's turn to judge andrew napolitano to b...

>> that's the problem. there should be an uproar over this. if they can get away with this, they can subpoena any information they want from any website that any of us uses to get our photographs and our browsing habits. that's just not something available to the government in a free society. >> shepard: has the government given the reason for this? >> the original reason was to make it easier to protect president trump so they know where the demonstrations are. >> shepard: the president needs to be protected against demonstrators? >> there's so many off duty cops amongst the demonstrators. th...

Absolutely required before a search warrant can be granted. >> shepard: the website's attorneys resisting. >> yes. >> will they be successful? >> i don't know if it goes before a judge that signed this. this is another oddity. the justice department did not go to a regular federal judge because none of them will sign it. they went to a superior court judge in columbia. the feds never go into state court for something like that. >> shepard: so a friendly judge? >> they found a friendly judge to sign this thing. it's beyond me how the prerequisites for a search warrant, the existence of a grand ...

It has already happened in durham, north carolina. last night we saw the statue come down at the hands of protesters even though there's a law not to dephase or remove statues unless you have the approval of the state's historical commission. >> shepard: thanks. the federal government is demanding the host of a website which organized anti-trump protesters hand over the records of everybody that visited that site. we'll talk to the fox news senior judicial analyst, andrew napolitano who says this is radically unconstitutional. that's coming up on the fox news channel. with my daughter. roller ...

Organized one against him here in new york city. some constitutional problems with this. it's privacy. when you log on to a website, it's between you and the webs e website. if you read the agreement, they promise not to reveal who you are. if they try, they will resist it. the website's lawyer probably called chilling. chilling is what occurs when government behavior causes you to have seconds thoughts about exercising your freedom of speech. so if i know the government will find out who i am, will i stop going on that process? the mental process of reevaluating of whether or not to go on the...