Couples. that designer, owning lori smith, has not started her wedding website business yet, but this her christian faith prevents her from doing work that celebrates same-sex marriage. smith wants to post a statement explaining that her policies actually based on her beliefs. so, she sued. she sued to get an exemption from colorado s antidiscrimination law that prohibits discrimination against lgbtq plus people buy businesses that serve the public. now, as this case was making its way through the judicial process, all the way to the supreme court, laurie smith s lawyers argued in a brief to the tenth circuit court of appeals that she had received a request from a prospective customer named stewart, inquiring about a celebrated celebrate his wedding tsv on say, a person named mike. this week, supreme court justices were sent to decide
Laurie smith s lawyers argued in a brief to the tenth circuit court of appeals that she had received a request from a prospective customer named stewart, inquiring about a celebrated celebrate his wedding tsv on say, a person named mike. this week, supreme court justices were sent to decide whether lorries missed should be able to turn someone like that alleged perspective customer name stewart, turned him away. a reporter decided to get his contact information from the publicly bailable filing. and reach out to him, to hear what he has to say. find out what was going on. what he had to say was actually startling. still claimed he never sent that inquiry. at the time it was sent, he was married to a woman. quote, i m married, i have a child. i m not really sure where that came from. but somebody is using false information in a supreme court filing document. he also questioned why he, a web designer, living in san francisco, would seek to hire someone in another state who is never built a wedding website,