Page 30 - Which Mueller News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Remedies are available to us including, if they subpoena us, challenge the subpoena. the same reason they can't indict him. >> laura: which mueller agreed. >> i don't think they agreed to the process question. they can't issue a subpoena to him. remember, clinton opposed the subpoena and then voluntarily complied. heub didn't give up presidential prerogative. >> laura: your old pal, michael on msnbc said the following. >> these folks can't get their stories straight, they can't figure out what they want to do. what they should be doing is telling theul truth. mr. giuliani asti recently as a we...

>> i don't think i ever changed that. the payment to her took place in 2017. the reimbursement is 2016. he is a make believe lawyer. >> laura: california bar is now investigating him. >> i don't want to talk about him. i want to talk about mueller. >> laura: you are not worried about cohn? >> we are completely uninvolved in that. we are gotten assurances we are not involved in that. it's only about mueller getting this over with. >> laura: the head of that left leaning ethics group crew, committee for responsible ethics in washington has said because we just learned about this liability recent...

President himself can be indicted. reason they can't indict him, they can't issue a subpoena to him. clinton opposed the subpoena. his administration said they m can't do that. >> laura: brett, it's interesting, the judgege made a point earlier today. he said when mueller said we are not going to indict the president because we are going to stand by this justice department advisory opinion that you can't indict a sitting president. this was in 1999 advisory opinion, it wasn't binding. so if mueller wanted to change his approach on that he could, which i found interesting. >> i thought that was...

Russia hoax to clear hillary clinton and frame donald trump. and the whole issue of allowing the president to talk to mueller. rudy said there is not a lawyer in the country that advises that. >> muller is it proven heap is not fair and neutral and nottive. why would you subject the president of the united states to somebody who has every intent of being unfair to you? my recommendation would be if mueller will not accept answers to a limited number of questions. let him subpeona the president and then i would ignore the subpeona, why? then mueller would have to hold the president in contempt ...

Department of justice policy which you are required to follow as an employee of the department much justice and moreover we want to understand how it is that you believe that you can burden a president like this while he's in office. and while i am at it. a few republicans in the senate are confused and voted to protect mr. mueller than the president and the constitution, and the american people. and they seem to think that they have the power even to tell the president who he can hire and fire. part of the problem of the president he is dealing with ignoreammous in and out of his party and so...