William Geen News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Because the police officer has to have the context, a criminal context in which to hold somebody for an immigration violation. let me tell you something. i had a case last year, it took eight months to figure out the person's status, okay? so think about it. you're asking a police officer, at a street, to figure out somebody's immigration status. >> william, is that a problem in and of itself? if you're looking at a system that takes eight months to figure out whether somebody's here legally or not, isn't that in and of itself a system that needs to change? >> that's very rare that that happen...

This whole controversy enough to motivate our elected representatives in washington to tackle the tough issue of immigration? just last night the house passed a bill to appropriate money dedicated to recruiting and paying more border patrol agents and developing new border security, fencing, and technology. house speaker nancy pelosi says this legislation honors our first responsibility to protect the american people by giving law enforcement the tools they need to address the threat of violence near the u.s./mexico border. it's one of the central pillars of bipartisan comprehensive immigratio...

President will respond because, of course, the fact that illegal aliens are leaving arizona in response to law enforcement indicates that there is no need for his comprehensive immigration reform amnesty scheme. jon: william geen. william thank you. >> thank you. jenna: the feds promising to go after however leaked thousands of secret war files just over this weekend. who else should we go after and how much information was really compromised? senator lindsey graham joins us next. raditional brokerage with my money. they charged me a small fortune, but i never really knew what they were doing....

United states have been suspended unconstitutionally by this president to grant a form of comprehensive amnesty. >> okay. that's your opinion. >> yes, it is. >> look, william, the legal experts are not backing that up, in any case. what they're saying is, it's not up to the state to interpret federal immigration law. >> no, no. >> that's what this judge said. >> go ahead. no, it's not legal experts. it's an immigration attorney, a guy who makes his money from illegal immigration, who's saying that. >> no, that's what i'm saying. that's what the fact is. that's what the judge said. i read it of...