Page 35 - Working Assumption News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Recognise the need to continue as vehicle forwards. same time, there is tension there. that is why we are there. we are not there to defend ourselves. we are there to defend ourselves. we are there to defend ourselves while the process american citizens first but also the other categories of people i mentioned. get into a place where we can fry them out to a safer and better future. 50 them out to a safer and better future. , , . , .,, future. so this suicide bomber was auoin future. so this suicide bomber was going through _ future. so this suicide bomber was going through that _ future. so t...

We have to continue to let on the airfield. the that is why we're there. we're not to defend ourselves. we're there to defend ourselves while we process american citizens first but also the other categories of people that i mentioned. get them to a place where we can fly them out to a safer, better future. >> so just to be clear, this suicide bomber was going through the gate being searched, checked by u.s. service members when he detonated his vest? >> david, that's -- that would be my working assumption. i know. this he did not get inside. he did not get on the installation. it was the unt f...

0 >> officials believe isis-k was behind the attacks, but they're still working to confirm that. the state department had been warning for days of a terror attack at the airport. we have reporters standing by. let's start with barbara starr at the pentagon. what do we know about these military members who were killed and what we're expected to hear from the pentagon? >> in just a very short while we are expecting to hear from general frank mckenzie, the head of the u.s. central command which oversees military operations in the gulf, the middle east, afghanistan. we expect to hear from him. i s...

No vote to formally authorize the investigation, that it will not cooperate. and that's something, of course, that has been rejected by a federal judge on friday in case, saying they don't necessarily need to have a vote. this was a legitimate, legal inquiry going forward. and democrats agree that notion. but nevertheless, they are having this key vote assigned and are rapidly moving to the next phase of this inquiry, guys. >> rapidly moving. can you give us details on that? there's talk about having the inquiry wrapped up by thanksgiving. is that a month from now? and having a full vote by ch...

Gar garrett haake is on capitol hill for us this morning. >> the working assumption is that he will not be showing. he filed a lawsuit on friday night asking a federal judge to weigh in on where his constitutional prerogatives are. if he needs to follow this congressional subpoena or guidance from the white house. all signs are that he will not be testifying this morning and disappointing he would be the first witness deposed that was on the phone call that started all of this. now if he does not, it could go to someone else on that phone call, tim morrison is expected