Live Breaking News & Updates on World independency

royal college of psychiatrists would offer the journal which was considering retraction. ii was considering retraction. if it truly becomes a thing where all they have to do is a strongly worded legal letter i think that will undermine confidence in the journal's ability to police the content that publishes. the journal that publishes. the journal that does not uphold editorial independency is not long for this world. we independency is not long for this world.— independency is not long for this world. ~ . ,~' ., this world. we asked the royal colleae this world. we asked the royal college for _ this world. we asked the royal college for an _ this world. we asked the royal college for an interview - this world. we asked the royal college for an interview on - college for an interview on whether the threat of legal action influenced their decision. they did not comment on that, but they did tell us this. given the distance and time since the original articles published, the widely available public debate on the paper, including the letters of complaint already available alongside the article online, and the fact that the article has already been subject to a investigation, it has been decided to reject the request for the article to be retracted. the original complainant said they would have surprised and disappointed. have surprised and disa ointed. , , ., disappointed. response we got from the journal _ disappointed. response we got from the journal had _ disappointed. response we got from the journal had nothing i disappointed. response we got from the journal had nothing to do the science of this article. not a thing. 0ur specific

Journal , Thing , Royal-college-of-psychiatrists , Retraction , Confidence , Retraction-ii , Letter , College , World , Threat , Decision , Action