Wouldnt Kill It News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Down on that? >> no, he was all for and had great promise and turned out to be a wonderful bargaining chip and we learned a little bit about defense, we are glad to have done that but in the reagan meeting, layed on the table all of our negotiating positions which he agreed to but made condition on what he said keeping fdi confined to the library and we interpret that as meaning kill it, so president reagan wouldn't kill it but in the end all of the things that were layed out and agreed to became agreements. chris: mr. secretary, there were great times, thank you for sharing them with us. >> t...

>> no, he was all for and had great promise and turned out to be a wonderful bargaining chip and we learned a little bit about defense, we are glad to have done that but in the reagan meeting, layed on the table all of our negotiating positions which he agreed to but made condition on what he said keeping fdi confined to the library and we interpret that as meaning kill it, so president reagan wouldn't kill it but in the end all of the things that were layed out and agreed to became agreements. chris: mr. secretary, there were great times, thank you for sharing them with us. >> they were great...

>> no, he was all for and had great promise and turned out to be a wonderful bargaining chip and we learned a little bit about defense, we are glad to have done that but in the reagan meeting, layed on the table all of our negotiating positions which he agreed to but made condition on what he said keeping fdi confined to the library and we interpret that as meaning kill it, so president reagan wouldn't kill it but in the end all of the things that were layed out and agreed to became agreements. chris: mr. secretary, there were great times, thank you for sharing them with us. >> they were great...

Don't think the extension of emergency unemployment is unpaid for. so they're going to be pushing to amend it one way or another. they'll be pushing to add spending cuts to it or maybe some type of pay for unemployment or redoing the way the sequester is paid for. if they do that, and if they do it in a kind of poison pill way and send it back to the senate, the senate could reject it. if they tried to put, say, cuts to social security through chain cpi as the spending cuts that would blow the whole thing up. now, maybe there's some type of spending cuts or tax cuts that they could work into t...