அங்கீகரிக்கப்பட்டது ப்ராஜெக்ட் இல்லாமல் மேற்கொள்வது மேலும் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

A Summary of Published Appellate Opinions Involving the California Environmental Quality Act
Despite relatively few published opinions this year, there were significant appellate court rulings on a range of topics, including whether projects are properly classified as discretionary or ministerial, the adequacy of mitigation, agencies’ document retention obligations, the remedy for an inadequate EIR, mootness, and statutes of limitations.
The one California Supreme Court CEQA decision addressed the distinction between discretionary projects and exempt ministerial projects. In
Protecting Our Water and Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus, the court held that the agency’s issuance of  well permits was discretionary in certain circumstances because the permit approval process required the agency to exercise independent judgment and allowed it to modify a project in response to environmental concerns. ....

Stanislaus County , United States , San Diego County , Placer County , Perkins Coie , University Of California , Public University , Mitigation For Impacts Of Oil , California Department Of Fish , Long Range Development , California Supreme Court , Agency Misrepresentations Can Bar , Published Appellate Opinions Involving , California Environmental Quality , Protecting Our Water , Environmental Resources , Fifth District , Negative Declarations , Ineffective Measures , Standards For Use , Greenhouse Gas Offset Credits Found , Golden Door , Mitigation Measures , Noise Analysis , Gas Drilling Ordinance Held , Planned Component ,