சுரன்சலி டான்டன் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Updated:
February 12, 2021 12:02 IST
It is not contrary to international tax principles and does not discriminate particularly against U.S. firms
Share Article
AAA
Last month,
found India’s Digital Services Tax (DST) to be discriminatory. It said the tax is “inconsistent with prevailing principles of international taxation”, and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce. India has denied these charges. The bone of contention is a 2% tax that India has charged since April 2020 on revenues from digital services, applicable only to non-resident companies. In a discussion moderated by Sriram Srinivasan, Suranjali Tandon and Nikhil Kapoor discuss this issue. Edited excerpts:
India introduced a 6% equalisation levy in 2016. From then to taxing a broader basket of online services in 2020, how do you view what India has done, especially in the context of the rest of the world? ....

United States , Donald Trump , Sriram Srinivasan , Nikhil Kapoor , Suranjali Tandon , Akhilesh Ranjan Committee , India Digital Services Tax , United Nations , Agreement On Trade In Services , United States Trade Representative , Digital Services Tax , Base Erosion , Profit Shifting , Income Tax Act , Akhilesh Ranjan Committee Report , General Agreement , Is Indias Digital Services Tax Discriminatory , Equalisation Levy , Base Erosion And Profit Shifting , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , டொனால்ட் துருப்பு , ஸ்ரீராம் ஸ்ரீநிவாசன் , நிகில் கபூர் , சுரன்சலி டான்டன் , இந்தியா டிஜிட்டல் சேவைகள் வரி , ஒன்றுபட்டது நாடுகள் ,