vimarsana.com

Latest Breaking News On - நிறுவனம் சிஇஆர்டிஐஎஃப்ஐசிஏடிஇ ஆஃப் ஒருங்கிணைப்பு - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

Opening a Bank Account in Bangladesh: What are the Requirements?

STARBOARD VALUE ACQUISITION : MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (form 10-Q)

LM Funding Announces 1-for-5 Reverse Stock Split

Press release content from Globe Newswire. The AP news staff was not involved in its creation. LM Funding Announces 1-for-5 Reverse Stock Split LM Funding America, Inc.May 6, 2021 GMT TAMPA, Fla., May 06, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) LM Funding America, Inc. (NASDAQ:LMFA) (“LM Funding” or “LMFA”), a technology-based specialty finance company, today announced a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock, effective at 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on May 7, 2021. Beginning tomorrow, May 7, 2021, LM Funding’s common stock will trade on a split-adjusted basis. At LM Funding’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) held on May 11, 2020, the Company’s shareholders approved a proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of its common stock at a ratio within the range of one-for-two (1:2) to one-for-ten (1:10), as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. On April 21, 2021, the Board of Dir

Facebook Defeats Shareholder Suit Challenging Alleged Failures In Its Diversity and Inclusion Practices | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

In Ocegueda v. Zuckerberg, No. 20-CV-04444, 2021 WL 1056611 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2021), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California became the first court to rule on a motion to dismiss claims alleging deficiencies in a company’s compliance with policies intended to promote diversity. The plaintiff, a common stockholder of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook” or the “Company”), alleged claims for breach of fiduciary duty and further alleged defendants made false and misleading statements in the Company’s Proxy Statement in violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The plaintiff alleged that Facebook’s public statements promoting values of diversity and inclusion were at odds with the Company’s alleged practices regarding (i) the hiring and promotion of diverse candidates to senior leadership positions; (ii) purported discriminatory advertising practices; and (iii) alleged hate speech on the Facebook platform. Facebook defea

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.