பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ஆஃப் தி நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ஆஃப் தி நீதிமன்றம். Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ஆஃப் தி நீதிமன்றம் Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Assessment of Class X students may pose danger to health of members of Result Committee, says plea in Delhi HC

Representative image
Assessment of Class X students may pose danger to health of members of Result Committee, says plea in Delhi HC
ANI |
Updated: Jun 05, 2021 15:52 IST
New Delhi [India], June 5 (ANI):A plea has been filed in the Delhi High Court on Saturday challenging CBSE notification on mode of assessment of Class X students apprehending that it poses a real danger to the health and well-being of the members of the Result Committee, other teachers and staff members.
The plea was filed by NISA Education Regd through advocate Ravi Prakash Gupta.
Advocate Gupta told a single judge bench of Justice Prateek Jalan, that on May 1 respondent-Central Board of Secondary Education issued notification with regard to the mode of assessment of Class X students, in view of the cancellation of the Class X board examinations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. ....

New Delhi , Rupesh Kumar , Ravi Prakash Gupta , Justice Jalan , Justice Prateek Jalan , Division Bench Of The Court , Delhi High Court On , Division Bench , Delhi High Court , Result Committee , Ravi Prakash , Central Board , Secondary Education , Delhi Hc , Class X , Health Threat , Covid Pandemic , Ancellation Of Boards , புதியது டெல்ஹி , ரூபேஷ் குமார் , ரவி பிரகாஷ் குப்தா , நீதி ஜலான் , நீதி ப்ரதீக் ஜலான் , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ஆஃப் தி நீதிமன்றம் , டெல்ஹி உயர் நீதிமன்றம் ஆன் , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ,

Constitution Guarantees Right To Trade, Not Profit-Allahabad High Court Dismisses Stamp Venders' Plea Seeking Continuation Of Stamp Papers in Physical form

Share This -
x
The Allahabad High Court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by the All UP Stamp Vendors Association, seeking continuation of judicial and non-judicial stamp paper in its physical form.
A Single Bench of
Justice Yashwant Varma dismissed the Association s contention that discontinuation of paper stamps by the State Government violates the constitutional protections guaranteed by Articles 19(1)(g), 21 and 38 of the Constitution.
At the outset, it was observed that merely because the Government has introduced E-Stamping Rules, does not show that it has discontinued the use of physical stamp altogether. Even otherwise, the Association s members right to deal in stamps is not a right but it is founded exclusively on the license granted under the UP Stamp Rules 1942. ....

Uttar Pradesh , Justice Kesarwani , Justice Varma , Ajay Bhanot , Justice Bhanot , Justice Yashwant Varma , Division Bench Of The Court , Stock Holding Corporation Of India , Central Record Keeping Agency , Single Bench , E Stamping Rules , Division Bench , Uttar Pradeshe Stamping Rules , Stock Holding Corporation , உத்தர் பிரதேஷ் , நீதி கேசர்வானி , அஜய பனோட் , நீதி பனோட் , நீதி யஷ்வந்த் வர்மா , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ஆஃப் தி நீதிமன்றம் , ஸ்டாக் வைத்திருத்தல் நிறுவனம் ஆஃப் இந்தியா , ஒற்றை பெஞ்ச் , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் , ஸ்டாக் வைத்திருத்தல் நிறுவனம் ,

India Supreme Court on Limitation Period for Filing Appeals Under the A&C Act

Supreme Court”) in the matter of
Government of Maharashtra v. M/s Borse Brothers Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. (“
Borse Brothers”) overturned one of its earlier verdict in the matter of
NV International V. State of Assam (“
NV International”).
1 The Supreme Court clarified that an aggrieved party must file an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“
A&C Act”) within 60 days from date of order. The Supreme Court further held that a delay in filing appeals under Section 37 of the A&C Act can be condoned by the appellate court. However, such condonation must be granted only by way of exception and is permissible if the delay is ‘short’. ....

Madhya Pradesh , Division Bench Of The Court , Varindera Constructions Ltd , Rewa Coalfields Ltd , Union Of India , Supreme Court , India Supreme Court , Nv International , Nv Internationalv State Of Assam , Assamnv International , High Court , Conciliation Act , High Courts , Limitation Act , Division Bench , Commercial Courts Act , Civil Procedure , Specified Value , Kandla Export , Where Section , Civil Appeal , Commercial Courts , Coalfields Ltd , Constructions Ltd , Per Incuriam , Supreme Court ,

Demystifying The Conundrum Surrounding The Non-Arbitrability Of Disputes In Arbitration - Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The decade-old uncertainty on the issue of arbitrability of
tenancy disputes stands settled with the pronouncement of the
judgment by the Hon ble Supreme Court in,
Vidya
Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation
1
(
Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh
Ahluwalia
2 (
Himangni
Enterprises
), provides much-needed
clarity on the nature of tenancy disputes that can be referred to
arbitration. The Dovetail Test laid down by the Court can be relied
upon in determining the non-arbitrability of disputes in general.
The Judgment also attempts to clear the conundrum surrounding the ....

West Bengal , Kamaljeet Singh , Satpal Singh Bakshi , Booz Allen , Vidya Drolia , Civil Court , Division Bench Of The Court , Honble Supreme Court , Himangni Enterprises , Garware Wall Ropes , Natraj Studiosp Ltd , Apex Court , Durga Trading Corporation , Delhi High Court , Order Of Calcutta High Court , Hamilton Inc , Supreme Court , Bench Of The Supreme Court , Order Of The Supreme Court Division , High Court , Dovetail Test , Conciliation Act , Supreme Court Division , Division Bench , Calcutta High Court , Arbitration Act ,

Sexual Harassment At Workplace - Impossible To Ignore How Easily 'Common Woman' Is Put Down By 'Common Man', Less Said Better About Third Gender: Delhi High Court

It also concluded that the
other incidents could not be established in the absence of substantive evidence as there were no direct witnesses.
Therefore, the Complaints Committee
Appellant s contentions
According to the appellant, the aforesaid decision was not communicated to her and it was only on 3rd July, 2013 in response to an RTI query that she learnt of the decision.
She filed an appeal but was also not again communicated the result of that appeal. In the meanwhile, respondent No.3/O.P.Verma retired.
She, therefore, filed the writ petition challenging the recommendation of 20th January, 2012 but the same was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. ....

State Of Rajasthan , Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw , Justice Asha Menon , Complaints Committee , Supreme Court , Division Bench Of The Court , High Court Observations , Sexual Harassment , Single Judge Bench , Single Bench , Division Bench , Internal Complaints Committee , நிலை ஆஃப் ராஜஸ்தான் , நீதி ஆஷா மேனன் , புகார்கள் குழு , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் ஆஃப் தி நீதிமன்றம் , பாலியல் துன்புறுத்தல் , ஒற்றை நீதிபதி பெஞ்ச் , ஒற்றை பெஞ்ச் , பிரிவு பெஞ்ச் , உள் புகார்கள் குழு ,