மஜ்லிஸ் பல்லி வகை இஸ்லாம் சிலாங்கூர் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from மஜ்லிஸ் பல்லி வகை இஸ்லாம் சிலாங்கூர். Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In மஜ்லிஸ் பல்லி வகை இஸ்லாம் சிலாங்கூர் Today - Breaking & Trending Today

The Edge Court Judgments Report


This monthly report is compiled and briefly summarised by a group of lawyers on a voluntary basis for the benefit of readers of The Edge.
Please consult your own lawyers if you need advice on the cases, issues and related matters highlighted here.
 
PERSONAL LAWS AND  JURISDICTION OF SECULAR AND SYARIAH COURTS
Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution (‘Constitution’), read together with the Ninth Schedule, List II,  Item 1 of the State List, provides that secular courts ‘shall not have jurisdiction in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah courts’ (‘State List’). The State List  provides for  personal laws affecting persons professing the religion of Islam and the jurisdiction of the Syariah courts is exercisable on two conditions. First, the person professes the religion of Islam (‘Legal Persona’). Second, the matter falls within the subject-matter enumerated in the State List (‘Subject-matter Jurisdiction’). ....

State Of Selangor , Azahar Mohamed , Hassan Ibrahim , Thiam Suan , Sdn Bhd , Hasnah Hashim , Hasnah Mohammed Hashim , Rhodzariah Bujang , Abdul Rahman Sebli , Nallini Pathmanathan , Zabariah Mohd Yusof , Kerajaan Negeri Selangor , Chee Kuan , Islam Selangor , Zabariah Yusof , Supreme Court , Fatwa Committee , Syariah Court , Housing Development , Housing Developers , Federal Constitution , Ninth Schedule , State List , Legal Persona , Subject Matter Jurisdiction , Renunciation Case ,

MP SPEAKS | The fiasco of Rosliza Ibrahim - is Federal Court wrong?


MP SPEAKS | The fiasco of Rosliza Ibrahim - is Federal Court wrong?
Modified7 Feb 2021, 2:46 am
A
-
MP SPEAKS | Having read the entire judgement of the Federal Court in the Rosliza Ibrahim case, I am of the view that the judgement has not been infected by any legal error. Yes, it may be dubbed as a non-populist judgement. Apparently, the Federal Court, to its credit, opted not to play to the gallery.
After all, that is the sacrosanct duty of any court of law - deciding every case before it purely based on the evidence presented by all the relevant litigants. Attempting to be populist should not become the business of any court of law. The court is tasked to deliver justice according to the law, not to deliver any popular judgement by ignoring it.  ....

Peninsular Malaysia , Malaysia General , Ibrahim Hasan , Lina Joy , Islam Selangor , Rosliza Ibrahim , Our Federal Court , High Court , Federal Court , Federal Constitution , Ninth Schedule , Majlis Agama Islam Selangor , தீபகற்பம் மலேசியா , மலேசியா ஜநரல் , இப்ராஹிம் ஹசன் , லினா மகிழ்ச்சி , இஸ்லாம் சிலாங்கூர் , அவர் கூட்டாட்சியின் நீதிமன்றம் , உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் நீதிமன்றம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் அரசியலமைப்பு , ஒன்பதாவது அட்டவணை , மஜ்லிஸ் பல்லி வகை இஸ்லாம் சிலாங்கூர் ,