Review Exonerate Paul Price - Wrongfully Convicted - Community in De

Why Choose Exonerate Paul Price - Wrongfully Convicted In Dekalb In Missouri

66.67% People Answered Yes For the Poll

Like Rating

2 Votes

Dislike Rating

1 Votes

Rate This location on below categories

Inclusivity, Engagement, Supportive Environment, Events and Activities, Networking Opportunities, Community Impact, Communication Channels, Collaboration Spaces, Member Benefits, Diversity and Representation.

1 Votes
1 Votes

Exonerate Paul Price - Wrongfully Convicted - Community in De


Missouri 6


Dekalb, Others


Missouri, United-states - 64497


noreply@vimarsana.com

Detailed description is Free Paul from injustice. The story of his case is a complete Violation of the Public's Trust by those entrusted with it. Mr. Price's wrongful conviction was based on fabricated photo evidence that was a complete distortion of an actual circumstance. . . This fabricated photo evidence was given to the Police three years after the alleged event took place which knowingly set the frame up for Paul to give a false confession to the distortion. . . Right away there should have been red flags with the Photo being given to Police as evidence in this case and should have been grounds to investigate further the accusations before filing charges. . . As the main complainant providing the Photo happened to be of all people a Mandated Reporter. A main complainant who held onto the Fabricated Photo for three long years. Despite Federal and State Laws requiring them to report immediately, hmm and this did not sound fishy! . . The evidence of Mr. Price's innocence can be found within the Self Authenticating Evidence of motion documents from his Divorce. Which were held in the same county he was on trial in, Madison County IL. . . The dates of these Divorce filings establishes that Mr. Price could not have committed the crime of taking the Photo provided to the Police because it would have been physically impossible for him to have done so. . . At the time when the fabricated photo evidence was made on June 21, 2008 ( the time date stamp of the image) the main complainant had already long since kicked Mr. Price out of the house and in the process had kept his phone and computer. Hmmm.... odd behavior for someone who claims to be a victim. . . This was admitted during testimony by the main complainant that when they kicked Mr. Price out, they had also kept his phone and computer. The main complainant also claimed during testimony they filed for divorce after they found the photo, the Divorce documents show this is a blatant a lie.. . A divorce that was in-fact actually filed long before the Photo had even been taken, as the date the divorce was filed was April 2 2008.. . The phone had actually been solely in the main complainant's complete possession for nearly a month and half prior to the date the fabricated picture was even taken and remained in the main complainant's sole possession for the next three years until they handed it over to Police.. . Within the Petition for Temporary Relief filed and dated April 2, 2008. The main complainant claimed their physical and mental well being were in peril. . . Stating their well being would be jeopardized by the continued occupancy of both spouses. The Judge temporarily granted their request on May 5, 2008 thus allowing the main complainant to have legal grounds to kick Mr. Price out and barring him from returning. . . This happened nearly a month and a half prior to the date the distorted photo evidence was fabricated on June 21, 2008, with a phone in the complainant's sole possession.. . Remember the complainant had already admitted when they kicked Paul out of the house and they admittedly kept Paul's phone and computer.. . Mr. Price was not allowed back in the home until August 28, 2008 when an order was signed by the Judge granting him possession of the marital residence. . . The timeline of the actual real events proven by the Self Authenticating Divorce Documents show. The events started in February 2008 when the main complainant met with the Divorce Attorney, next was March 2008 when the papers were signed. . . Then in April 2008 with the filing of the Divorce and Request for Temporary Relief. Next was May 5th 2008 which was the date Paul was kicked out of his home and his phone confiscated. . . The same date the Divorce Judge temporarily granted the Petition for Temporary Relief. The next hearing was held on June 3rd 2008, Judge signs a temporary order for the Temporary Relief petition that continues to keep Paul out of the home as they must keep the status quo. . . Finally we come to June 21 2008 this is the date the photo was fabricated with the phone that had already been in the main complainant's complete sole possession for nearly a month and a half.. . Recall the main complainant had kicked Mr. Price out kept his phone and computer. This was on May 5th 2008, numerous co-workers of Mr. Price confirm this. . . August 2008 was when Mr. Price was finally allowed back into his home. This was nearly two months after the distorted photo evidence had been fabricated on June 21, 2008. . . By August 28, 2008 the main complainant and main complainant's children (Mr. Price has no children) had already moved out with Mr. Price's belongings and nearly all the marital belongings. The only things left were a few pieces of worn out tattered furniture.. . Mr. Price's accusers knew Mr. Price would answer all Police questions honestly and used his honesty to Frame him. . . A long enough time had elapsed from the date when the distorted fabricated evidence was made that everyone involved had forgotten the real timeline of events, including Mr. Price. This set the frame up.. . In a very sleep deprived state Mr. Price was asked if he took a picture with his phone of his Step child sleeping, Mr. Price admitted to taking a picture of his Step child with his phone as there was nothing to hide. Who has not taken a picture of their step children?. . Mr. Price has adamantly stated from the beginning there was no nudity in the image he took of his stepchild. The Police claimed otherwise and refused to show Paul the image in question as they stated that would revictimize the alleged victim. . . Due to so many inconsistencies in the main complainant's and other complainant testimonies the state did not want to pursue counts one and three, those charges were dropped.. . Paul was never shown the image in question throughout the proceedings. False confessions are the leading cause of wrongful convictions innocent people. .

Established in the recent years Exonerate Paul Price - Wrongfully Convicted in dekalb, missouri in united-states.

This well-known establishment acts as a one-stop destination servicing customers both local and from other parts of the city...

Frequently Asked Questions About This Location

Qus: 1). what is the mode of payment accepted ?

Ans: Cash , Credit Card and Wallets

Qus: 2). What are the hours of operation ?

Ans: Open all days from 9:30 to 8:30 and exceptions on Sundays

Qus: 3). What is the Latitude & Longitude of the location?

Ans: Latitude: 39.909736234537, Longitude: -94.21875