A (A Child)(Withdrawal of Treatment: Legal Representation) [2022] EWCA Civ 1221

In allowing the parents’ appeal, the court concluded that the judge’s decision to refuse adjournment had been unfair. Common law principles of fairness were applicable and it was unnecessary to rely separately on art 6.

Related Keywords

London ,City Of ,United Kingdom ,Justice Hayden ,Bruno Quintavalle ,Hill Dickinson ,David Lawson ,Jack Anderson ,Yasmin Jamil ,Duncan Lewis ,First Respondent Hospital ,Supreme Court ,Authority Solicitor For The Intervener ,Family Division ,Civil Division ,Family Law ,Citation Number ,Second Respondent ,Local Authority Solicitor ,Right To Fair Trial Legal Representation Withdrawal Of Treatment Hearing Whether Refusal Adjourn Allow Parents Be Legally Represented Breaching Echr ,Mrt 6 ,