vimarsana.com


Andrew P. Napolitano
WASHINGTON — A colleague recently asked me if I approved of Big Tech censoring political and cultural voices on their platforms. My colleague believes — as do I — in natural rights, minimal government and that owners of private property can use it as they see fit. We both condemned the Big Tech censorship. Then he asked if the government could regulate these platforms. I offered that it could not.
These questions arose from the reported efforts by Facebook to bar from its platforms those who wish to offer scientific, political or cultural arguments against mass vaccinations. Many of these arguments are sound and fascinating. Nearly all are provocative. They are the essence of free speech. Should those who offer them be silenced on a platform used by billions of folks?

Related Keywords

United States ,Washington ,America ,Abraham Lincoln ,John Adams ,Woodrow Wilson ,Facebook ,Big Tech ,First Amendment ,Sedition Acts ,Local Columns ,Big Tech And Free Speech ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,வாஷிங்டன் ,அமெரிக்கா ,லிங்கன் ,ஜான் ஆடம்ஸ் ,வூட்ரோ வில்சன் ,முகநூல் ,பெரியது தொழில்நுட்பம் ,முதல் திருத்தம் ,உள்ளூர் நெடுவரிசைகள் ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.