breaks down legally, jenna. i think this maybe is being overlooked as we focus on this hideous young man. there is a big difference, particularly in latin america, in the way crimes of passion are viewed as opposed to crimes of property. in other words, the family, the ramirez family, the flores-ramirez family, they are alleging that joran van der sloot killed stephanie ramirez to get the money she had won gambling. jen yuen that's key. >> that's key. that would be a crime, a murder for property gain, that could really see him sentenced to the rest of his life behind bars. on the other hand, joran's explanation, his excuse, is that he saw her, she was going through his property, his computer, he had a spontaneous, impassioned reaction and they had been intimate and in the heat of the moment, he killed her. that's where certain commentators are getting the