a trickly phrase man slaughter statute at all. that jury instruction seems pretty simple. >> absolutely not. it's very simple. i do want to clarify. mr. bates didn't inadvertently pulled his resolver. he carried a .357 resolver from his patrol vehicle, which is unmarked. he had a bright yellow taser on his chest and he has a pistol in his right hand. according to mr. bates' fist statement, and his initial statement, he had a pepper ball gun in his left hand that he used his right hand to power the valve up with. i'm curious how that happened. if mr. bates inadvertently grabbed his pistol from his truck, not pulled it out right when this event is taking place, but literally carried it from his truck how that's not culpable. he walks up to the man with a .357 that he's not certified to use and i doubt any deputy whether they're reserve,