it. she needs to justify how a st state, official can come into a federal election and declare in a state, that a federal law has been violated regarding the challenging of election outcomes. and that constitutional right embedded in the fi first amendm, embedded in the president's executive privilege and embedded in the constitution for freedom of speech cannot be vitiated because a district attorney has chosen to politicize it and that it and that is in other point break all of this issues are not state, issues. the a federal court issues. this case no matter how long it runs will end up in federal court three, four, five years down the road. any convictions resulting in this case will immediately be challenge to the federal circuit court of appeals in the united states supreme court because it involves "corrupt activities of a federal election cycle."

Related Keywords

Election , State , Law , Official , St State , Declare , Donald John Trump , Constitution For Freedom Of Speech , Outcomes , Executive Privilege , Challenging , Fi First Amendm , Case , Federal Court , Issues , The D A , Point Break , Matter , Four , Five , Three , Road , Convictions , Activities , United States Supreme Court , Circuit Court Of Appeals , Cycle ,