Youre watching are 2 international bring you your live news update from our studio here in moscow welcome to the program 1st the Russian Ministry of defense has confirmed that turkish troops were among the militants fired on by Syrian Government troops and it looked province on thursday also insists there were no airstrikes from the russian side and 33 turkish soldiers were killed in the province it responded by hitting Syrian Army Positions from the air for all the details were joined live in the studio by quarter now what has been happening talk us through it well jacki the Syrian Arab Army has been fighting for months now to defeat the last millett militant stronghold in the province of syria and now according to moscow the turkish troops that were killed on thursday were among a large scale offensive by terrorist groups in the province of idlib. On february 27th near the settlement of b. Whom turkish soldiers who were embedded with terrorists came on to the Syrian Army Fired at the same time according to the coordinates transmitted by the turkish side to russia there were no turkish troops or units in the area now the ministry of defense like you said also says that no russian planes were involved in this airstrike it was the result of a syrian planes and its also important to note that russia says that it was not informed of the presence of turkish troops in the region at the time and what is turkey have to say about all of this well so far we havent heard anything from the turkish president but we have heard from the minister of affairs and he says hes going to hold syria to account for what happened. Turkey is determined to continue until it for fills its objectives in accordance with its legal rights the murderous regime and those who encouraged it will account for their betrayal in the most severe way now on the other hand before this attack actually occurred on thursday we also heard something from the syrian delegate to the u. N. Those calling for a cease fire negotiations with the terrorists by the ignorant to directly supporting those terrorists ill ask you why didnt you the western powers negotiate with bin laden and al baghdadi to assist fire than to. Now one of the big problems here is that there have been some talk about the possibility of nato using its article 5 to intervene on behalf of turkey in this in this instance and basically out of article 5 means that if a member of nato was attacked then that represents an attack on all members of nato but but the specific problem with this is that this only officially has to do with countries that are attacked in their own borders so whether or not this is going to happen is something thats still up in the air but of course well keep our viewers updated as the latest details become available. In court i think you for bringing us the latest on that. And now were going to cross live to jamal wakim a professor of history and International Relations at the Lebanese University and beirut for further analysis on this how serious is this latest escalation do you think. Well i believe its a serious escalation from the. Turks who chose to intervene militarily and directly because they were doing so by proxy by training organizing and i mean. Terrorist groups fighting the Syrian Government so not. This city and i mean it was a who started it there are those sources all instability that size even. If. Thats what they have begun who is on. That area. Where if so but it would include the text not to intervene directly in 30 june. First and foremost by you know the russian side. However the to be insisted on sending. A monitoring positions and that. Airstrikes you know. Just one not 2 but that its. A gun insisted on sending more troops and this is the result of the. City and a raid on. Their hands all. Its. All weve heard from russia that according to him and information that they were sent that turkey had no troops in the area and they shouldnt have been in that area why do you think we have a discrepancy that. Well i believe that it was a known secret. Of course for a political reasons because the russians and the cities didnt want to leave this region and lead to a direct confrontation with the turks the right one and not to send troops or enough to support. The terrorist group. Upon. Them weeks or. Syrian army was. Who launched it on just to throw a line. Out of syria and we need to mention that the turkish presence and it is not legitimate its not sanctioned by any u. N. Resolution and it will consider that as invasion order and occupation by the autumn power of city and get it ready and turkish officials have vowed consequences if more of its soldiers die in syria for example letting Syrian Refugees reach europe what do you think that sort of threat is aimed at and what response does anger expect. This is aimed. Strike to pressure to be a need to intervene on that side however nato different from doing so because on that article by. The. Right we seem to be having some technical difficulties there we were speaking which im all joachim professor of history and International Relations at Lebanese University in beirut. Meanwhile against the background of the military action and lives Syrian Refugees are moving toward the European Border these pictures obtained by our roughly below agency show people carrying children reportedly making their way to greece as we mentioned earlier turkish officials have threatened to open the borders more turkish troops are killed in syria. And with the number of newcomers set to rise people on the greek islands are holding protests against their governments latest plans to create new refugee camps there on thursday the island of lesbos was paralyzed by a general strike people joined a march chanting slogans against the Current Situation existing camp on lesbos currently holds around 20000 migrants although it was only designed for 3000 earlier this week several rallies against the building of more migrant cams turned violent and the governments an extra police there but the move only made islanders more angry. The fight continues nothing is struggling to prevent the construction of any close to open prison last night was a big win for the people of lesbos who repelled the landing of the governments repression forces on the island of lesbos to rise you know this one to work they said and tried to police to the press so strong go to continue one close to the hot spot. Where the government managed to unite all the people of this against its policy which would great a large warehouse of refuge in migrant prison this. No new camp is constructed on the islands the immediate removal of the existing camps the closure of the moria camp received guarding of borders and the regulation of n. G. O. S our lives have been destroyed. On wednesday violence erupted as protesters rallied near a military camp on the island and tried to attack Police Officers with stones and players and local media reports say on the same day are around 60 people were injured. The greek government says there is only one solution. There is no alternative to the governments plans to build a closed structures to accommodate refugees and migrants. Former i mean pay you notice marius things athens needs to redouble its efforts to deal with the migrant influx the majority of. Migrants. What we. Say is the government should save god. God one. True or north with the examination. And also the government has to start the issues. From the European Court of human rights says that. In the area of sigint then the government has the right to do. So i think the government has to be more active on the issue of the patients. Down to the us where Democratic Party leaders are being urged to group around one candidate to prevent Bernie Sanders from getting the 2028 nomination a Party Leaders seem unable to unite ironic single figures just yet donors know how to pull their strings as i tell reports. They say money cant buy you friends or happiness but might be true but they could just buy you the white house mega dona Bernard Schwartz has been digging deep in his pockets to help the democrat course but its not entirely a no Strings Attached situation we should know who is the best person to be dull trump and with all due respect Bernie Sanders. So which horse is short is betting on well hes not fussy but either of his friends from the Billionaires Club will do who just like him arent shy on splashing the cash and since were already here together lets look at just how much cash with king take joe biden now hes discovered that he cant just rely on his instagram a bromance with obama to take him all the way so decided instead to drop a 6 figure sum just one for good measure though he did keep in some of bollman the style. This is an extraordinary man with an extraordinary career in Public Service youve got to admire him though if i were trailing 12 percent behind the top candidate and had my own backers jumping ship id be a bit tighter on the past strings by the way biden still pales in comparison to what his buddy bloomberg has spent so far its estimated the ex new york mayor has dropped a casual 400000000 on his campaign but hey its only no point 6 percent of his 64000000000. 00 fortune so no biggie also at least hes having some fun with it not even the aspiring u. S. President is above a cheeky trolling campaign and it seems to be paying off because hes risen from the very bottom of the polls to somewhere near the top of course lets not forget he is an old hand when it comes to knowing just what money can get you all of the new democrats that came in put nancy pelosi in charge and gave the congress the ability to control this president i got them hoops well lets look for. Field now at some of the candidates like people too much credit to sense that people might not be found of this whole exclusive club of the rich so decided to play the role of the average joe just the man on the street and im the only candidate on those debates stages in this race the major candidates whos not a millionaire or a billionaire what the if a penniless candidate and big Money Politics well if you believe bunny not quite were going to contrast our views with mayo to judge 40 billionaires who are contributing to his campaign the heads of the c. E. O. s of the large pharmaceutical industries the Insurance Companies and so forth well since bonnie is made to the parents lets peek inside his coffin he might go about divvying up the cash once he gets his hands on those Government Funds but until then it seems hes more about treating himself he has dipped into his funds and brought out around 14000000. 00 for just a few t. V. Ads so it seems that no matter what side of the political spectrum youre on you know that to win in this case you need a lot of the green stuff to help you along the way but money is always played a big part in american elections especially since 2010 with the Us Supreme Court ruled in a case called Citizens United that you could spend as much money as you wanted on candidates because corporations spending money on politics is free speech spending money is free speech corporations are people thats what this Supreme Court decided thats a travesty and thats really undermined american democracy even more and made it more a money game then ever before thats a big problem in the us money yes and the role of money is growing even more but i dont think its at a point where a Movement Like senators could still prevail. Still to come in the program on hollywood directors lets flip apples Product Placement paul flee thereby possibly spoiling future whodunnit movie is back and a few moments. Seemed wrong. Just dont hold. Any news yet to shape out this day become active. And engagement equals betrayal. When so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground. The republicans have a reputation as knowing more about money than the democrats but the democrats are always very confusing and so Bernie Sanders is just out of a tradition hes talking about socialism which again is a its a its a model based on a in comprehensible all. Non existent theory about money. Welcome back france has been enraged by comments made by the ambassador of its ally mali comments were critical of french antiterrorist squads in the west african country right across live now to our correspondent in france charlotte devinsky who has all the details so charlotte what exactly did the ambassador have to say. Well his comments raised tensions between roles once again following those comments made in the French Senate know the mali and criticize french soldiers on the ground in mali denouncing the actions in the capital this is what he had to say front of the senate hearing. There are no desirable some elements of the army because we see it all we see 2 twos all over and we dont know what theyre doing on the streets of but mark oh its night and its not good for the image of france. Well those comments provoked a huge anger from some french government officials inside the mall the ambassador was hauled in front of the French ForeignAffairs Ministry here in paris to explain those comments and presumably to apologize we also heard from the french or french. Forces minister Laurence Foley it was few is about those comments saying that they were not to polls but they were sceptical this was a statement from her ministry. Rather than channeling and spreading false accusations we expect the message of mali to devote all his energy to implementing the post summit and achieving success for everyone. Well florence probably also went on to say that it was untrue because there were hardly any french so just station. In the mali in capital in fact not many have been stationed there since 2014 now just a few weeks ago president michel held a massive summit in the south of france the g 5 sawhill summit where he brought together the leaders of the nations over the sought help countries to talk about operation ball came this is frances Largest Overseas military operation with more than 5000 soldiers stationed across those 5 countries in the fight against jihad just searching out and trying to get rid of the hardest terrorists all the grounds that he talked about the conflict be the conflict that was being paid for with the blood of french soldiers lets not forget just a few weeks a few months ago 13 french soldiers were killed in a helicopter collision when they were pursuing joe harvests on the ground top of that they have been massive protests in some of these countries including in mali with citizen saying there are unhappy with french soldiers being deployed that some Holding Placards up saying go home others accusing france of still treating countries like mali as being. Entities they are of course former colonies of france now on top of all of that in the mali and president admitted recently that his government was pursuing talks with the geologists to find a way through to find a solution to the issues on the ground all of these raising many questions here in france. That operate in many people unhappy with the operation now we know that the mali and Foreign Affairs minister is on his way to paris to try to smooth over the tensions as a result of these latest comments but the reality is questions are likely to be asked once again if french soldiers are not welcome on the ground by citizens of the country if the comments by the mom in a past. There are a ticket if what the government thinks upright shoulders and if the money in government is having these talks with your heart this is why some people say of french soldiers on the ground the possibly of forsaking their lives to fight jihad this is our to charlotte devinsky reporting from paris thank you. A court in the german state of has or has banned head to head scarves from being worn by judges and trainee lawyers and courtrooms the court says it goes against the neutrality in a courtroom less show archies peter all over has more germanys Constitutional Court has decided that when it comes to wearing islamic headscarves court rooms are a special case a blanket ban on religious symbols similar to what they have in france isnt favored in germany but when it comes to wearing islamic headscarf in court thats a different matter the court has rejected the constitutional complete against the ban on wearing a headscarf for certain official activities all those obligation constitute an interference with the completeness freedom of belief and other fundamental rights this is justified the case was brought by german the rocket legal trainee you argue that the state of cases rules that she couldnt wear red scarf while carrying out certain official duties was constitutional the ruling by the Constitutional Court has raised a few eyebrows on social media with people asking the question why a crucifix is allowed to call room but a headscarf is not. On the one hand the state may prohibit women lawyers in training from wearing the headscarf in court in order to maintain ideological and really just neutrality on the other hand germany a courtroom must be religiously neutral hands the headscarf ban also germany. Headscarf ban because the court should be neutral at the same time crucifix on the wall because it is known not to be a religious symbol has scarf bans target the group that is most discriminated against in germany in making the ruling the Constitutional Court pointed out that head scarves can be worn in the Court Building their only prohibits is when. Public duties in the court itself i spoke to people on the streets of believe in us that they made this decision ok. I think its absolutely not pride believe in a free country and there is one here has the right to freedom of expression and freedom of religion. As in this nation are no no i think that its wrong because it concerns religion if you lead an obliges you to learn it then you have to do it no matter where you go thats why i dont think its right that its forbidden. We are old people they have their own culture and we have our culture those people have to adapt to where they are i have nothing against it those people who come to germany they have to adapt but i have nothing against the headscarf in germany 16 states have differing rules when it comes to religious symbols in this case the cole ruled that the trainee lawyer couldnt wear a headscarf as it went against the neutrality that a court room must show however it has led to questions over there being one rule for christians and another for muslims this is not a job this is something we need to do so this is something its belong to vote a law on the constitution and they need to have what is in the constitution and it should be neutral all we know about it were out of here and the country was a coastie only to remain over that is the only and they need to respect that and the main of the people a lot of people in this culture they dont want to see a lot of muslims on of their religion. Who are being the symbols of privilege used to presenting the constitution in the cost this isnt something we are told no we had a bow of the main constitution of the country and to make us your country need people who will be presenting the law without any other allegiance to be mixing in this law. Hollywood movies might become more predictable for the king i had after knives out director ryan johnson revealed that apple has a very strict policy when it comes to showing their products on the Silver Screen artist by book i goes into more detail in the latest episode in case you missed it. Guys in movies concrete i phone for example heres a picture of Jamie Lee Curtis in the movie nights out and shes holding an i phone and that means that she is a goody so the evil one is never going to want not holding the microphone because a very protective of its image according to the director of the knives out who will probably really revealing that in an interview i dont know if i should say this and i probably shouldnt but this is very pivotal if youre ever watching a Mystery Movie bad guys cannot have i phones on camera in fact back when by 3 of the 24 was a big deal in the early north seas some very geeky yet as you. Pointed out the fact that all the bad guys were on p. C. s and all the good guys used to have a little maddox lie say lets turn that very on its head heres my iphone 8 is a good here is me and i will be back in the all fair. With my i for him yes barry yeah barry yeah. Yeah barry. Is making cause face. I missed the teddy bath. After all ill be waiting for your call. Thats our global news update for now ill be back in about 30 minutes though with more. Thousands of american men and women choose to serve in their countrys military decision little sheltered lives every thing came to a complete. The day that i was raped be instructed you know told to shut up but theyd kill me and i see how destroyed my life any screamed at me and he made me come in the gram my own arm and he write me with his birthing curia if you take into account that women dont report because of the extreme retaliation and its probably somewhere near about half a 1000000 women have now been sexually assaulted in the us military rape is a very very traumatizing thing to have happen but ive never seen trauma like ive seen from women who are veterans who have suffered military sexual trauma reporting rape is more likely to get the victim punished them the offender and almost 10 year career which i was very invested in and i gave that up to report a sex offender who was not even put to justice or put on the registry this is simply an issue of power and violence male sexual predators for the large part of target whoever is there to prey upon whether thats a man or woman. Join me every thursday on the all excitement and ill be speaking to us of the world of politics or business im sure. Ill see you there. Visionary me. Well they say lets never change that which is so much true about humans so who is really in charge of my life me or my brain and our will one well i talk about this with professor of neurobiology at the university. 1st of fog its really good to have you on our program so we have lots to discuss you say that any basic trait of a person i dont know such a Sexual Identity predisposition to something is actually decided in mothers womb when you are 4 your brain is formed within the will a lot of other neuroscientists will argue with you because theyre saying what we are is our genes plus the upbringing but in your case you are saying its not nature versus nurture its just nature no i have never said ok and i think that the distinction between nature and science because from the very beginning its an interaction between the 2. So its nature into action this nurture but to not show the stars at the moment of conception so its the end violence in the volume its also very important its not only. That you can influence. The nature. And that means that the whole idea in the bone. Structure of the brain is decided to some extent. Some functions are programmed for the rest of your life in the bomb when you say to some extent to what extent like if we have a percentage what is the sense on the function so if you look through Sexual Orientation and gender identity