Native san franciscan. I went to elementary through high school here, and i just retired as a Deputy Sheriff up sheriff about three years ago im still working. As far as housing, i was a homeowner, but i got into an upside down loan and lost it. Im sorry. God bless. It has been hard for me to get home, and probably about four years ago, i lost my home. I had a short sale, i had been looking at this program for a long time, and i was able to put my application in, they picked my name, and i call it a blessing. Im sorry, i dont want to be in here crying. [laughter] anyway, so my family grew up here and all of my family members moved out. They are in other cities, and my grandmother to this school. Thats great. In the sixties and seventies. So just being able to have a down payment assistance, and being able we need the programs, we need a 100 affordable because it is even hard to save enough money. We have to make a lot of sacrifices to even save to get into the down payment assistance program. Another thing that i believe is important is the Housing DevelopmentHousing DevelopmentCorporation Council because half of them probably would not have even gotten into that program. I could have gotten into something affordable, and that wasnt down payment assistance, that was just regular. So that is very important. And just the education on what to do and what not to do, i was the first person on my moms side of the family to purchase a home. I grew up in subsidized housing in fillmore. So it is great to be able to have a home and to also have other people native of San Francisco to be able to stay here. I will never leave. I have something to leave my daughter now. It is very important. And they see me with a home, and now they believe they can buy a home because i never believed that i could even own a home. It is about your kids, this is real, i appreciate i love that you are in bayview. Yes. That is great. I am able to give back as a retiree. I do still work, but i can give back to my community because i do make my own schedule. That is one thing i love to do, and they love to share in the program and being a testimony that people think, you cant even get it, and then, well, i got it, so let me show you how to get in, and then once they pull your name, i believe that god did not take up this part to leave us. Once they pull your name, theres all of this red tape you have to go through. They ask you for something, they ask you for something else. Just do it. I remember one time i was called up and she said i know this is nerveracking and i said no, it is not nerveracking. Whatever you need, i look at it because you were getting are getting me down payment assistance. [laughter] so i would say, some people may want to quit once they are chosen because of all of the paperwork, but if they pull your name, you are getting a home. Dont quit. Dont quit. I can go on thank you. [laughter] i need to talk about it. Have you started the application process . No. I know about it, but i havent. Do a lot of your colleagues know about it . I believe so. Is there a buzz about this . [laughter] the resources that the city gives you a lot of people are just unaware. My phone blew up once when i find out when i found out i got the program. That is how i found out i got it you become an expert as you walk through the process. You are happy to give it to them because you want a home, and a lot of people are in the same position to own a home. They would do anything. Yeah. Thank you, guys, for putting a human face. Thank you for sharing your story , and thank you, mayor for everything you are trying to do at a local level and what is not surprising about this conversation is we could be having this conversation in any other part of the state of california. When you look at the 50 most expensive cities for rent in the United States, 33 of them happen happened to be in the state of california. Not surprisingly, not just from a rental perspective, but even more broadly, does finding housing that is accessible in your price range, the costs are astronomical, but for one fundamental reason. We are not building enough housing. We are 49th out of 50 in per capita housing. It is only utah on a per capita basis that develops less than the state of california. It has been decades in the making. It manifests in every conceivable way, but fundamentally, the expression of frustration relates to the time and value of money and the patients one has to develop a project, even at 100 affordable , taking up to seven years, foundational he is one of the greatest impediments to this states future, to your future, to our collective future because i posit that the california dream is in real peril if we do not address the housing crisis. It is a world i went to Great Lengths over the last 20 years not to say because i think we are often using the word over using the word crisis and it dilutes its meaning. But when it comes the cost of housing in this state, it is a crisis. You dont need any more evidence of that beyond this conversation than to see its ultimate form in manifestation and that is homelessness, which is skyrocketing. It is not just growing. I consistently make this point. I said for all of the focus on San Franciscos homelessness, you have one of the most modest increases compared to other parts of the state. This is serious stuff, and it requires a much more serious and intentional response. It is significant, it is important. The challenge is the scale and scope, and the amount of resources that are needed at a local level that can never meet your demand, a collective demand and aggregate demand. Weve got to do a lot more. The state of california needs to lead that effort. I wanted to just briefly talk about some of the things that the state is advancing and please feel free to leave or answer any questions. I dont want to keep you away from your skills a great on science, as we were talking your skills upgrade on science, as we were talking. This is almost 3 billion of new investment in housing and homelessness. 2. 75 billion dollars to be exact 1. 75 of that was to help support local efforts on housing, go through my financing and tax credit perspective as well as loan perspective. 1 billion in new tax credits and loans that were set aside. That is all about leverage. Leveraging what is happening at the local level, leveraging what is happening in the private sector, and being able to pull down more federal dollars. We believe our Tax Credit Program can leverage one and a half to 2 billion of Additional Resources beyond the half a billion that we put into that program. We have put up 250 million to help cities, large and small with their predevelopment work, with their planning work. They update their master plans to get the experts and consultants so that we have mitigated one of the principal complaint i hear, and that is we simply cant afford the staff. There other priorities in the state, so we have offered that as resources. Half a billion dollars just in infrastructure financing. A lot of cities cannot afford the sidewalks, the lighting, the sewer hookups, so we have an unprecedented amount of money in that space to draw down. That was something that came out of a dozen plus conversations that we had with smaller, rural cities, in particular that are struggling, just to, quite literally, do basic things, let alone help invest in jumpstarting housing construction. A billion dollars and homelessness, it is substantially more than we have ever put in the past. Much of that is directly to cities and counties for flexible purposes. Rapid rehousing, conversions of old motels, to preserve and not just expand s. R. O. S in San Francisco and other preservation efforts but all that is not enough. I will close with this. There are three additional things that we are working on in the legislature over the course of the next few weeks. We have to deal with the rent gouging in this state. Some cities of rent control, some dont. Some are more aggressive as it relates to those issues. I dont think any city is more aggressive than you are, mayor. It is still challenging. We are working with the legislature to get rent gouging ordinance to my desk, and this is one of our Top Priorities over the next few weeks before our legislative session ends. We also are trying to get 331 million set aside to help tenants that are on the verge of eviction, to help them with legal support. Were trying to create an endowment, instead of it is something that with surplus dollars to potentially look at one time investments, forget ongoing because those are stressful for mayors, but an annuity of sorts. Were setting aside 331 million regardless of recessionary pressures that will be set aside for rental protections and legal aid. Those dollars will be made available to San Francisco and all across the state. That is a legislative effort. And finally, weve got a bill that goes directly to your frustration about permitting. Nancy skinner has a bill, i dont want to bore you, but it is a streamlining and permitting bill to address the abuses and address some of the abuses of local government that our down zoning that are down zoning in a time of crisis as opposed to up zoning. It is a really important legislative effort that we are hoping comes to my desk in the next few weeks. That is the message we want to send. Were getting more serious about this than ever. We have half a billion additional dollars. I know you got all of this up, i have lost two, but there is no place like home. It is a bond that we are able to put out for supportive housing, for people with Behavioral Health issues. A lot more resources than there has been in the past, but never have we had a challenge this big in our states history. We have to meet it head on. You are doing it at the local level and we need to help you more at a state level. And yes, the federal government needs to help support cities, large and small, that are the economic engine of this country, and increasingly, not just this administration, that Previous Administrations, government has gotten out of the housing business. It is a skeleton of what it once was. I think it is incumbent upon governors and local leaders to call that out, as well. We cant do this, even at the state level alone. We need the federal government to get back in the housing business because urban and Metro America is struggling with these issues, even chicago, not just here in San Francisco, and this is incumbent upon us to call that out, as well. That is the Broad Strokes message. It is a big issue, an important issue and a complex issue. We are grateful for your leadership and all of you for being with us today. Im happy to take any questions. Do you have any for them . I dont want to burden all of you. They are just here for you. [laughter] if that is what the mayor is saying, then i need to get out of here. [laughter] that is great. Im happy to take any questions. [indiscernible] what is your position on the new ballot measure . They have refiled, but i want to complement not only those that have refiled, but others for their willingness to engage and to pursue a compromise, pursue an alternative, pursue a strategy to avoid a historically costly ballot fight. I dont know what will come of those conversations, but those conversations are ongoing. They have been for some time. They have been renewed with a deeper sense of urgency over the next number of weeks, but my position is to see if we can process those conversations along and try to build a monochrome of consensus because at the end of the day, there are winners and losers in a property tax debate, and not everybody will be left happy. I dont want to overstate these efforts, but those are ongoing negotiations. As it pertains to housing, obviously homelessness comes up so much because the problem is so acute. We see the effects on our street everywhere we go. But when you sit down at a roundtable have a conversation like this and you hear from teachers, firefighters, and people make up the Service Fabric of the communities, and they are being displaced. Does that represent an existential crisis . I dont thank you do overstate. I love the way you framed it from a moral perspective in terms of who we are as a society and what we represent, how to define community and a commonwealth when so many people that appear to be doing well are actually struggling, and so many people that clearly are struggling are also struggling in historic numbers. So this issue it has been with us for decades. I was a former supervisor here 20 plus years ago. This was the issue. It hasnt gone away. It is just more acute than ever. And the nature of the change has now been fasttrack. I am even feeling it as a fifthgeneration san franciscan with family here and businesses here. I am acting like that old san franciscan, i remember the days, and this place im starting to act like that. I know where those impulses come from because they are warning. Im also concerned about that. I am concerned broadly about the state. Rather than complain about it and lament about it, we are trying to do something about it. Im doing something no Previous Administration is doing, in a holding folks accountable. I talked about the carrots, not the sticks, but we are suing i sued Huntington Beach because they didnt want to get in the housing business. They werent doing enough. Fortysix other cities were being threatened with lawsuits. Tomorrow we will announce seven of them now that are in compliance. Another one across the bay just came into compliance. Were working with the others to get them in compliance. I just passed a trailer bill in the state that will allow courts to actually take over as conservators for some of the cities and the resources that they receive from the state if they dont produce housing. We are going to get much tougher because at the end of the day, the state of california cant develop the housing. At the end of the day, california cant solve the issues of homelessness for local government pick localism is determinative. It has to happen at the local level. My job is to amplify good behavior, support these local efforts in every way i can with support but also accountability and we have to see it on the back and the accountability. We have to see results. You cant just keep throwing money at this. I want to know what they will do with this billion dollars. I want to see real results. We gave them flexibility, deep urgency, new rules, new regulations, we will help you with the nimby is an that exists , and i will push back against that, as well, but i want to see real results. Forgive me if that isnt a soundbite, but it is a mouthful because this is just so profoundly complex and get so simple. More housing, deeper prevention dollars, key people in their homes, and lets preserve existing housing stock. [indiscernible] significant. You have seen a number of announcements which are examples of those conversations now being made public with some of the Largest Tech Companies in the state of california that have committed funds for housing, not just for low income housing, but for workforce housing, as well. I can assure you there are a number of others that will be making public announcements very soon that also will be a point for those conversations. Absolutely we believe in accountability. We think it is a twoway frame and i can assure you this, talking to the c. E. O. S, they get it because their number one problem is housing for their employees. It drives up the costs for them as it relates to recruiting talent, salaries, and it drives most principal complaint that they get in terms of retaining their key talent, because their families are earning a great deal of money and cant afford to stay in the bay area. Developers say they are being distance that devised [indiscernible] let me just say this. Theres more money in this your s budget than the amount of money that was set aside when we had the redevelopment. I could go through the list on the atkins transaction bill, the no place like home money that we put up, the money we put up for tax credits and loans, we created a new Tax Increment Program called an enhanced infrastructure financing. I dont know why this doesnt get more attention. It doesnt because what the hell does that mean . We have to change the names of all this stuff so people understand it. But it is a variant on redevelopment where we eliminated the voter approval to do tax increments. That was a big deal. In and of itself that was a big deal but it got lost with the larger housing package, but the impact fees are great. We have to call that out. The reason why is exactly to your frame of the question. It goes to carlas question because the way our property tax allocations work. And prop 13 is the principal source. If you want to go to the y. , you go back and you have prop 13. You have to connect that. What im trying to do in these conversations is to connect the impact fee conversation to the larger negotiations. That is a bank shot of sorts because it makes it particularly more complex, but i think it is so fundamental and foundational in terms of addressing the affordability issue in the state you cant build an 800,000dollar Affordable Housing unit. That is what you are doing here. It is laughable. Someplace his and i said you have to be kidding. They were half a Million Dollars , not in a big urban center like this. That will never happen. We are incentivizing new styles, forgive me, but in that list of things, we are encouraging and we are prioritizing new modular and prefab strategies. We are doing a lot with excess Surplus Property in the state. We have 45,000 parcels. We reviewed state property that we could set aside for development and we are prioritizing those methods for those parcels, and we already have six cities that are partnering with us to fast track the development of those units in order to get those costs down and waving all of those state related fees and fast tracking our permitting process. In order to be able to afford housing, you have to be making enough money. One of the problems is theres a bigger and bigger part of the gig economy. Would essentially make it harder to make people independent contractors and actual employees with benefits. How do you stand on that . We are negotiating on it. We have been negotiating on it for nine months. Can you say, wait a second, you have been governor only seven, right after i think a week before the election we started having very robust conversations it was continued for about two hours yesterday and six for the day before. My chief of staff is consumed most of her days to see if we can accommodate different points of view. As you know, many folks have been accommodated with amendments to the bill. There have been a number of industries that have been carved out, and i know this impacts all of you, as well. So many others would like carveouts or accommodations would like to be considered differently, and im open to argument. We are pursuing that and i am not naive about where the prevailing wind is on any of these issues. [indiscernible] i had just walked in and i try to avoid my thread on twitter because i have enough emotional issues from my early a Early Childhood trauma, but i was just made aware of this. It was a very serious issue. It goes to the core of people wanting to live in a city as spectacular as this and that foundation is safety. I hear it all the time. These qualityoflife crimes, these crimes that were stopped, and it appears, in this case, she was very fortunate. It could have been a terrible incident. It was just a traumatic one, and how often they are dealt with. Sometimes people flippantly deal with it and not seriously deal with it. People are back out on the streets, potentially to commit the crime again. I am very sensitive to what was presented to me, but i dont have the benefit of the details and fax to address a tweet, but i deeply respect the emotional tenor of not only that example and that incident, but more broadly, what i hear when i come back in the city about car breakins, about qualityoflife , about what is happening on the streets and sidewalks, and as a former mayor , im deeply sensitive to that. Your mayor is doing an extraordinary job, but she is going to need, as we all do, more support and that is one of the reasons we are here in the city. [indiscernible] yeah. He was up in our office two days ago. I asked him about it and we are really looking forward to his exploration. He was very pragmatic about it. He says we are pursuing it, but it continues to be a pursuit. So we are monitoring that closely and i am intrigued by the concept, but i want to see where he takes it and i know that there are a number of people, including the conversation i had with our leadership three days ago in the capital, that are also looking at that and thats all i can say right now. There is no pending legislation, but there is intrigue around that frame. [indiscernible] 2020, that is the most important thing we can do because our current h. U. D. Leadership is well, 2020 is important. It is not just 2020. I will be candid with you, it has been a point of frustration going back to when i was a parking and traffic commissioner in San Francisco. And you look at the trendlines of h. U. D. In terms of their housing support, and it has been declining for three or four decades, and i just think, you know, you meet with mayors, you meet with governor his. I was just with the governor association. The issue of affordability is not unique to california. It is just extreme here. But this persists in large metros all across the country and it is a growing issue in america. The reality is, at the end of the day, we need the government to help support some of these regional and local efforts, and i thank you will start hearing a united chorus around this that hopefully can fundamentally answer that question, not just with administration change and leadership change, but he foundational understanding of whats at stake in terms of affordability in america at large. Good afternoon, thank you for coming to the july 30, 2019 board of supervisors. This will be our last meeting, the next meeting will be beginning of september. Madame clark will you please call the role. [roll call] mr. President you have a quorum. Thank you. Please join me in the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. On behalf of the board, i would like to acknowledge the staff of sf gov tv. They record each of our meetings and make the transcripts available, to the public, online. Madame clerk, are there any communications . Clerk we received a communication from the office of supervisor wilton, who indicated he would be late in attending the meeting as he is attending a funeral this morning. Thank you very much. Colleagues, before we move forward with our meeting today. I want to share a message of unity and strength with the city of gilroy. We are outraged, by yet another horrific mass shooting, to the community of gilroy, we stand by you. To the victims, and their families, we are praying for you and we pledge to fight until action is taken on gun reform. Lost to us today are 25yearold trevor irving, 13yearold, kayla salazar, and 6yearold stephen romero. Please join me in a moment of silence, to honor the young wives stolen for this unnecessary act of violence. Lives stolen for this unnecessary act of violence. Thank you. Colleagues, today we are approving the minutes from the june 20, 2019 special special Board Meeting. The june 25, 2019 regular Board Meeting and do 19, 2019 june 19, 2019 and june 20 [ crying ] 2019. Board and finance committee meetings. Which constituted a quorum of the board of supervisors. Are there any changes to these Meeting Minutes . Seeing none. Can i have a motion to approve as presented made by supervisor fewer and seconded by supervisor mandleman. These will be approved after public comments. Madame clerk, can you please read the Consent Agenda one through 20. Clerk mr. President , given that supervisor walton is not present in the chamber, and eddie funeral today would you like a motion to excuse him from the votes until he arrives . A motion made by supervisor safai, seconded by supervisor stefani. We would take this motion to excuse mr. Wong from the votes until he gets here. Okay. Clerk 120 are on consent. These items are considered to be routine. If a member objects an item can be removed and considered separately. Okay. Colleagues . Today, im sorry, would anyone like to sever any items from the Consent Agenda . Seeing no names. Madame clerk, please call to roll. [roll call]. Supervisor yee colleagues, these ordinances are passed on the resolutions adopted. Madame clerk, please call items 2130 together area. Items 2130 or 10 ordinances on final reading that pertain to the budget for the city and county of San Francisco for fiscal years 20192020 and 20202021. Item 21, appropriates receipts and expenditures as of june 21 of 2019. Item 23 is ordinance adopting the neighborhood beautification and graffiti Cleanup Fund Tax designation ceiling for tax year 2019. Item number 24, 190624, ordinance authorizing the execution and delivery of certificates of participation, in one or more series from time to time, on a taxexempt or taxable basis, evidencing and representing an aggregate Principal Amount of not to exceed 160,000,000 to refinance certain certificates of participation that financed various Capital Improvement projects and finance certain additional Capital Improvements; approving the form of a third item number 25, 190626, ordinance appropriating 160,000,000 of one or more series of refunding certificates of participation proceeds, deappropriating series 2009a and 2009b certificates of participation of prior reserve funds of 16,500,000 and reappropriating refunding certificates of participation series 2019r1 of 176,500,000 and placing these funds on controllers reserve pending the sale of the certificates of participation for fy20192020. Item number 26, 190627, ordinance amending the fire code to increase fees for certain Fire Department services; and affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act. Item number 27, 190628, ordinance amending the park code to permit the recreation and Park Department general manager to set guest docking fees at the marina small craft harbor by flexible pricing based on certain factors; and affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act. Item number 28, 190629, ordinance amending the park code to permit the recreation and Park Department general manager to set nonresident Adult Admission fees for the Japanese Tea Garden, the coit tower elevator, the conservatory of flowers, and the San FranciscoBotanical Garden by flexible pricing based on certain factors and at certain times; and affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act. Item number 29, 190630, ordinance amending the park code to permit the recreation and Park Department general manager to impose a surcharge of 1 per nonresident adult visitor at the Japanese Tea Garden to fund the restoration of that facility, until such time as the restoration is complete; and affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act. Item number 30, 190631, ordinance amending the administrative code to eliminate fines for Overdue Library books and other materials and equipment, and forgiving outstanding patron debt for overdue fines. Supervisor yee before we take a vote, once again, i would like to Say Something about our budget on item number 21, i know we have said this over and over again. You know, it was such a fine process i have to keep on thinking the person behind all of this. I want to thank chair fewer, head of the Budget Committee. Once again, i cannot thank you enough for getting us out of these chambers before midnight. It was, again, such a great process. So transparent. The staff, chelsea, was magnificent. Many of the other staff out there contributed to the budget process. Chair fewer, congratulations. Before we take this vote. We are making history, biggest budget ever. Quickest budget created ever. We are solving, beginning to solve as many problems as possible as much as ever. Forever i hope you will be the Budget Committee chair. [laughter] i just want to thank you chair fewer. Thank you for your kind words i want to thank my co members, actually, of my committee for all of those long meetings. Thank you so much for the support. Especially to you for affording me this opportunity to serve the board and the residence of San Francisco in this capacity. Supervisor yee i dont want to ignore that there are others in the city government, controller, from the budget office, thank you very much. Colleagues, can we take these items in call . Without objection objection these ordinances are passed unanimously. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Item number 31, 190495, ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the city and county of San Francisco on tuesday, november 5, 2019, for the purpose of submitting to San Francisco voters a proposition to incur bonded indebtedness not to exceed 600,000,000 to finance the construction, development, acquisition, improvement, rehabilitation, preservation, and repair of Affordable Housing improvements, and related costs necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes; authorizing landlords to passthrough 50 of the resulting property tax increase to residential tenants under administrative code, chapter 37; providing for the levy and collection of taxes to pay both principal and interest on such bonds; incorporating the provisions of the administrative code relating to the citizens general Obligation Bond oversight committees review of Affordable Housing bond expenditures; setting certain procedures and requirements for the election; adopting findings under the California Environmental quality act; and finding that the proposed bonds are in conformity with the general plan, and with the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1 b . Supervisor yee thank you everybody for cosponsoring this legislation to put it on the ballot for november. I am looking forward to this passing in november. Colleagues, can we take the same house speaker, nancy pelosi one call . Without objection this ordinance passed unanimously. Madame clerk please call the next item. Item number 32, 190709, ordinance approving Health Service system plans and contribution rates for calendar year 2020. Supervisor yee colleagues, can we take this item same house in call . Without objection this ordinances passed. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Item number 33, 190048, ordinance amending the planning code to 1 require building setbacks for buildings fronting on narrow streets, 2 modify front yard requirements in residential districts, 3 increase required rear yards in singlefamily Zoning Districts by five percent, 4 amend the rear yard requirements for through lots and corner lots in certain districts to permit second buildings where specified conditions are met, 5 allow Building Height increases to existing stories in existing nonconforming buildings in order to accommodate residential uses, and 6 provide that specified alterations to nonconforming structures for the purpose of creating habitable space or an accessory dwelling unit are not subject to section 311 review requirements if the specified requirements are met; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; and making findings of consistency with the general plan and the priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1, and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and general welfare under planning code, section 302. Supervisor yee im going to call on the author. Supervisor mandleman thank you. Thank you for your engagement with my office over the weekend. I think several of us will be offering amendments to this legislation today. I have a couple. They are shown on this document that has been handed out by the clerk. My changes relate to two things. One is grandfathering in applications that were submitted prior to january 15, 2019, when we submitted this legislation. And then the other is to exempt out the Bernal Heights special use district, at the request of the district nine office. Requesting amendments from section 261. 1 controls, which apply to additional height limits for narrow streets and alleys. Those are the two things that i wanted to amend. I know there are others. Supervisor yee is our second for that . Seconded by supervisor ronen. Hopefully we will all accept these amendments. Supervisor peskin . Supervisor peskin i would like to reinsert, and this was actually in the legislation and then was taken out of the legislation which means it will not have to be re referred or require any more public comment. Which is to add residential mix use districts of which i know there are a lot. The city commonly known as district three, as well as other districts. I think it is a good change to section 26, 261. 1, applying standards to secondstory setbacks along alleyways and narrow streets. I would ask that page 16, lines 416 section b, subsection 2, subsection b, that any frontage reinsert rm and make that same corresponding change. Also on page 16, subsection c, the controls in this section shall apply, et cetera. That would be my motion which i have discussed with the maker and is acceptable to him. Supervisor yee okay. Thank you. I just wanted to thank supervisor mandleman making an exception for Bernal Heights. It is one of the neighborhoods with the highest concentration of narrow streets. For that reason had a special sed. I want to thank you for taking that into consideration and thank you for agreeing to do that. Supervisor yee i want to thank supervisor mandleman for this legislation. While i support the general intent of this legislation, i would like to offer a friendly amendment. We have heard from some of my Community Members that there is a concern over elimination of 311 notifications of residential roof height increases to assisting stories. While many of these changes may not be significant, impacts could vary from project to project. For instance these height changes or roof adjustments could impact light exposure. In these instances neighbor should be made aware so they can work with the project sponsor to solve their concerns or get therefore i am proposing to retain guidelines for 311 notifications as they are currently in place. The amendments would be to strikethrough lines 912 on page one. Lines 23 and 24 on page 13 and lines 2223 on page 17. Colleagues, i hope you will be supportive of this minor amendment to keep 311 vacations consistent. Okay . So, there has been im sorry. Could you reiterate the last change . Supervisor yee the amendments, it is a strikethrough lines 912 on page one. And then line 2324 on page 13. And lines 22 and 23 on page 17. Thank you. Supervisor yee there has been three individuals making motions. Supervisor ronan would you like to be second on all three . Thank you. Colleagues . Two of the amendments conflict with another, one of the amendments adds the provision with regards to specified alterations and the other strikes that language. Am i missing something . The First Amendment included a subsection six. Not subject to 311 notice, and then the third amendment strikes that language for you to something . Deputy City Attorney john gartner. The double underline section number six in the long title. Was added as an amendment in committee. That is reflected in the document supervisor amanda meant supervisor thank you for that. Supervisor yee there has been amendments proposed and made motions for an seconded, all three seconded by supervisor ronen. Can we take these amendments without objection . Can we take this item as amended same house, same call . Okay. This ordinance has passed. Our First Reading as amended unanimously. Lets go to item 34. Item number 34, 190731, ordinance amending the planning code to change, from 18 months to three years, the period of nonuse required to deem as discontinued a permitted conditional use in the north beach neighborhood commercial district; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under planning code, section 302. Supervisor yee im sorry, supervisor walton, did you just come in before the last vote, or after . He came in before the lasso. Supervisor yee im sorry, please resend the last vote. We need to take. [roll call] , i believe. Is that correct . Clerk i think that is correct. Motion to resend is in order. May i have a roll call on the amended item . [roll call]. Supervisor yee . Dot ordinance is passed on First Reading as amended unanimously. Back to 34, you already read out. Colleagues, can we kick this item same house, same call . This item has passed unanimously. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Item number 35, 190732, resolution retroactively approving an agreement between the city and county of San Francisco and the San FranciscoBay Area RapidTransit District bart regarding administration of Capital Funding to fund half of the cost of the bart muni Market Street entrance Modernization Project with proceeds from the sale of general Obligation Bonds, in an amount not to exceed 45,000,000 for an Agreement Term from february 1, 2018, through december 31, 2025. Supervisor yee can we take the same house and same call without objection . This resolution has passed unanimously. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Item number 36, 190743, resolution authorizing the Sheriffs Department to enter into a third amendment to the existing contract between keefe commissary network, l. L. C. , and the city and county of San Francisco, acting by and through its Sheriffs Department, for jail commissary services, to extend the Contract Term by six months beginning september 1, 2019, for a total term of september 1, 2014, through february 28, 2020, with no change to the guaranteed annual minimum income of 590,000. Supervisor yee can we take this item same house and same call . Without objection this resolution is passed unanimously. Please call item number 37 and 38 together. Item number 37, 190758, resolution authorizing the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development, on behalf of the city and county of San Francisco, to accept and expend the county competitive allocation award in the amount of 18,250,554, under the California Department of housing and Community Development no place like home program, which provides funding for counties to develop multifamily housing specifically for persons with serious Mental Illness who are homeless, chronically homeless, or atrisk of chronic homelessness, for a term to commence following board approval. Item number 38, 190759, resolution authorizing and delegating to the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development, on behalf of the city and county of San Francisco, to accept and expend the county noncompetitive allocation award in the amount of 9,519,091 under the California Department of housing and Community Development no place like home program, which provides funding for counties to develop multifamily housing specifically for persons with serious Mental Illness who are homeless, chronically homeless, or atrisk of chronic homelessness, for a term to commence following board approval. Supervisor yee can we take this item same house, same call . Without objection these resolutions are adopted unanimously. Madame clerk, next item, please. Item 39, 190761, resoln authorizing the acceptance and expenditure of California State Senate bill 1 local Partnership Program formulaic funding in the amount of 2,340,000 for San Francisco public works sunset and parkside streets pavement renovation project, for a term to commence following board approval through june 30, 2023. Supervisor yee colleagues, can we take the same house, same call . Without objection this resolution is adopted unanimously. Please call the next item. Item 40, 190763, resoln authorizing the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to expend a gift to comptons district transgender, lesbian, gay, and bisexual tlgb Stabilization Fund dollars in the amount of 300,000 to support the citys efforts to recognize and support historic and presentday tlgb communities in the tenderloin neighborhood, for a term of august 1, 2019, through june 30, 2020. Supervisor yee can we take this same house and call . Without objection this resolution is adopted unanimously. Madame clerk please call the next item. Item 41, 190765, resoln declaring the intent of the city and county of San Francisco city to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtedness; authorizing the director of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development director to submit an application and related documents to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee cdlac to permit the issuance of Residential MortgageRevenue Bonds in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 50,000,000 for 401 avenue of the palms parcel c3. 2 of the Treasure Island master plan maceo may apartments ; authorizing and directing the director to direct the Controllers Office to hold in trust an amount not to exceed 100,000 in accordance with cdlac procedures; authorizing the director to certify to cdlac that the city has on deposit the required amount; authorizing the director to pay an amount equal to such deposit to the state of california if the city fails to issue the Residential MortgageRevenue Bonds; approving, for purposes of the Internal Revenue code of 1986, as amended, the issuance and sale of Residential MortgageRevenue Bonds by the city in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 50,000,000; authorizing and directing the execution of any documents necessary to implement this resolution; and ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the project, as defined herein, and the application, as defined herein. Supervisor yee can we take the same house same call . Without is adopted unanimously. Madame clerk please call the next item. Item 42, 190766, resoln authorizing the San FranciscoPublic Utilities commission to accept and expend a grant in an amount not to exceed 3,759,822 from the california state Water Resources control board for planning, design, and construction of the Sewer System Improvement Program baker beach green street early implementation project for the period of november 4, 2017, through march 21, 2022. Supervisor yee can we take this item same house same call . Without objection this resolution is adopted unanimously. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Item 43, 190764, resoln approving and authorizing the director of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to execute documents relating to loans for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or permanent financing of four project sites pursuant to the small sites program, preservation and seismic safety program, and downtown neighborhoods preservation fund, for a total loan amount not to exceed 37,493,000; confirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; and finding that the project loans are consistent with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1. Supervisor yee can we take this item same house same call . Without objection, this resolution is adopted unanimously. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Clerk item 44, resolution to approve Real Estate Division to acquire Real Property located at 1828 egbert avenue from San Franciscos self storage number three llc, doing business as 1828, for the Purchase Price of 67. 3 million and to adopt the appropriate findings. Clerk . Supervisor yee can we take the same house same call . Without objection this resolution is adopted unanimously. Madame clerk, please call the next item. Clerk and ordinance to amend the Building Code to waive specified fees from 100 Affordable Housing projects and certain accessory dwelling units , projects for an approximate one Year Pilot Program and to affirm the sql determination. Supervisor yee supervisor mar. Thank you. Finding a balance between incentivizing adus and ensuring larger real estate investors, and landlords are not granted public subsidies they do not need. Eighty years are very appropriate strategy to add density to the district and other website neighborhoods. The fee waiver aims to incentivize adu production where it has been underdeveloped and singlefamily homes, small apartments. We should support every day members in our community to stay in their homes, provide or create rental units for members of our community. Along with the fee waiver on 100 Affordable Housing, this additional financial incentive will help immensely. In the sunset district we held an adu adu workshop this last weekend which drew over 150 residents. Through the workshop, and surveys, my office has been collecting from homeowners. I have received overwhelming inputs and requests for more flexibility, more options and greater support from the city. I did want to finally mention that im currently working on an adu Incentive Program to expand on the waiver and create Additional Support for homeowners to add adus, including Technical Assistance and other types of financial incentives. Ill have more to announce on that this fall. Thank you. Thank you. I also want to thank the mayor, and my colleague, supervisor mar for helping, and working altogether to have this one year pilot come forward for a fee waivers for a hundred affordable adus. They would apply to building inspection, plan reviews, records, retention, surcharge fees, fees on 1 Affordable Housing can range up to 100000150,000 per project. We are confident this aspect of the legislation will positively impact 100 Affordable Housing project. While the amounts say per project, is much smaller for adus, amounting to a few percent and have a total of a total project, roughly around 3200 on average for most of the small adus. Our hope is that this just stands, bringing Public Awareness to build adus and bring more Property Owners interested in building adus to do that this year, rather than waiting. I am really excited, supervisor mar, that you had your adu workshop and people came out, 150 people