Process that could facilitate envisioning the future of emerging technologies. Today the most salient example of emerging technologies are mobility, focus and impacting our streets and sidewalks. The guidelines in the prince was of the office will be inclusive of technologies beyond mobilitys. To include startup and technologies that will potentially impact of critical resources, whether it is water, air, and our environment. The office of emerging technology will speak to industries beyond mobility and transportation including health services, public, private partnerships, later sharing agreements, and anywhere there is a nexus between emerging technology and the public realm. The emerging Technology Diversity must be accommodating the most vulnerable persons, including seniors, children, and those with mobility and other limitations, not the other way around. Not retrospectively or as an afterthought. The privacy of our residents must not be compromised with data collection, and of an emerging technology. The creation of emerging technology will allow the departments to maintain their respective objectives, while working collectively toward this goal of supporting emergency technology, and limiting Public Resources to serve the welfare of san franciscans. I look forward to working with all of you, the public, private and tech sectors as this legislation is established. Resident setting guiding principles, and for the office of emerging technology. The rest i submit. Thank you, supervisor brown. Thank you, madame clerk can you add me as a cosponsor to supervisor peskins displacement legislation . Thank you. Colleagues, id like, many of you, have heard from dozens of massage and bodywork practitioners in this past week, due to over 200 letters from the department of Public Health. These letters were sent out, for a whistleblower complaint. Filed with the department. This is actually scary, and alarming, for many practitioners who are struggling to make a living in the city and keep their doors open. Although, this industry is designed to relieve our stress, and our aches, we know that our practitioners have felt the pain of overreaching regulations, extremely restrictive zoning. All of us at one time or another have spoken about the importance and making it easier for Small Businesses to do business in San Francisco. This is one industry where the citys current regulations are doing just the opposite. They do not reflect the importance of integration of massage to the delivery of the healthcare, and stifling its growth. I have three actions that i am asking today. One, i am calling for the City Attorney to drop comprehensive legislation that will improve Economic Vitality of legitimate massage businesses. It is clear to me that we need an ordinance that will potentially amend our planning code, our health code, and make administrative reforms. For the past several months, my office and i have been working with the office of Small Business to get policy direction , and i would like to thank regina, and her staff, for your support. I also appreciate supervisor mandleman and ronen for joining me on this work, given how this impacts their districts, too. We met with the massage council to hear the concerns and understand the challenges of this industry. I am committed to commonsense regulatory amendments that would not only serve legitimate massage business owners, but also would retain the integrity of controls put into place in order to prevent illicit sex work, and Human Trafficking. Two, i am calling for the department of Public Health to ease up on enforcement of our massage practitioners while we undergo this legislative process. This overall would take thoughtful work. And we need time to do this. We need to bring more people to the table, and work with the massage and bodywork industry, anti Human Trafficking advocates, and our sex worker advocates to determine the next steps. Lastly, i am asking for the office of Small Business to meet with them massage practitioners, on friday september 13 to get additional policy direction from the industry. We cannot develop solutions in a vacuum, we need to hear from this community. San francisco has also been a leader in delivering highquality healthcare, and we have been a leader in developing integrative healthcare. We can do the same for massage and bodywork. This is not just about the delivery of healthcare, it is an two important equity issue for women and Small Business owners. This issue impacts directly our frontline communities; women, immigrants, people of color and our queer communities. The American Massage Therapy Association estimates that nationally, massage therapists are mostly 80 , likely to be so practitioners, enter massage Massage Therapy profession as a second career, and the medium age of a massage therapist is 44 years old. The federal bureau of labor estimates there is 1900 female massage therapist employed in the bay area earning a yearly Median Income of 42,890. We need to protect this lifeline , for our women, on the margins. Colleagues, i also realize that there are illicit sex, and human traffic operators that fronted their operations under disguise a massage. I also believe that we can create regulations of that it can growth for massage as part of healthcare, and not allow illicit operators to open. I applied my colleagues were taking additional solutions, we need systematic change. I am also asking, my fellow supervisors, to please work with me on this. I need your input and guidance. I look forward to working with the City Attorney, supervisors mandleman,. Seven and the rest of our colleagues to make this happen. The rest i submit. Supervisor viewer. Thank you. Colleagues, across the city we are seeing the alltoofamiliar longrunning construction projects, that have real impact, not only to our streetscape but also on a Small Business courtyard. We hear from our Small Businesses about concerns regarding Pedestrian Access, parking impact challenges with loading and unloading, and other Significant Impacts the bottom line of viability of Small Businesses as well as the economic neighborhood. Small businesses are the backbone of our neighborhood. It is time that we intentionally and proactively care about resources with mitigation strategies for large projects as a way of protecting our Small Businesses due to construction. With a supervisor brown, i am requesting that the City Attorneys Office Dropped an ordinance that would mandate, incorporate a Small BusinessConstruction Mitigation Fund as part of large construction projects. Where threshold of a Significant Impact to Small Businesses can be estimated. There should be a very intentional consideration of the potential Small Business impact. I would like to see projects have a line item that accounts for percentage that will be set aside a for the purposes of a Small Business construction mitigation. It is critical we have the resources in place to develop programs and processes to best support Small Businesses for construction. The unique Small Business needs vary along project neighborhoods, one thing is similar, Small Business merchants can use the relief. Thank you supervisor brown for your support, as we develop this ordinance for the Small BusinessConstruction Mitigation Fund. The rest i submit. Supervisor haney. Thank you, madame clerk. I wanted to say brief word about the resolution that supervisor mark, and i, and president. Yee added his name, i did have the opportunity to visit brandon, his family, in the philippines, a hospital, and he is definitely improving, he is able to breathe on his own. He is able to be responsive, conscious. He is still very much in critical condition, and to make things even worse, hes even in a situation where his security is still very much at risk. There are people that come into his room, and around the hospital, saying they may be affiliated with police who attempted to assassinate him. This is a very urgent situation that we want to continue to bring attention, and publicity to, so that the u. S. Embassy, the philippian government responds and ensures his security, and health. We also have been looking into opportunities for potentially bringing brandon back home with the support of our department of Public Health, his mom who is there with him, is a 30 plus year employee of the department of Public Health. His brother is a nurse area i just wanted to thank you, and your staff for your advocacy for brandon, and we want to continue to do everything we can to support him. Calling on hearing for the decision to take away 75 of permanent residential treatment beds from seriously mental l people. This is a responsible and illogical. We need to get to the bottom of this the residents of the Behavioral Health centers adult residential facility are extremely vulnerable and they need the help of our Healthcare Professionals to assist them with their activities. They require the help of nurses to assist with her laundry, management and handle their finances. While we drafted the legislation, we worked closely with a core group of experts who passionately advocate for the rights of the same clients to reside where theyre at. What i heard from them, time and time again was that we have a broken Mental Health system that fails to address the serious needs of mental ill clients braided the system does not adequately serve all of our essential needs because of the severe shortage of permanent housing solutions. Reducing the number of beds available was such a Vulnerable Group at this alarming rate is sending a clear message that we are willing to turn our backs on them. Their needs are far less important, when we are prioritizing temporary shelter beds in terms of longterm housing solutions. Instead of focusing on the needs of both populations, we have pitted them against each other. When we make these decisions it is critical that we take our advice from the Mental Health professionals who are on the front lines, and who are the experts. If it wasnt for the leadership of the frontline workers and members of local 21, this problem would have been swept under the rug i would have caused dire consequences for the health and wellbeing for the residents of the area as well as the workers they consider to be family. We do need low Barrier Navigation Centers to treat clients suffering with Mental Health and Substance Abuse issues. However that cannot happen at the expense of shutting down 75 of these beds. We absolutely need to hold a hearing on this decision and schedule it, by the end of this month. The future and wellbeing of the residents are depending on it, and we owe it to all of them to advocate for their health and safety. The rest i submit. Thank you. No other names on the roster. Why dont we just go ahead and called the first 3 00 p. M. Special order. Items 912, comprise the 3 00 p. M. Special order for public hearing of persons interested in a Community Plan evaluation by the planning department, under the California Environmental quality act, issued on june 11, 2019 for the proposed project at 655 fourth street. The next three items comprise the motions that are associated with the public hearing. We are in receipt of a communication from david lamb, withdrawing his appeal, this withdrawal was dated august 29, 2019. Okay. Then, if they are withdrawing the appeal, we dont need to have this hearing. Correct . I believe the appellants are in the audience, mr. President and can come to the podium and make a statement. With the appellant like to do that . And a Public Comment, mr. President. I dont see anybody coming up , so why dont we have Public Comment on this item . Seeing no Public Comment. Public comment for this is closed. Thank you, mr. President. I wanted to thank the appellant in the project sponsor, we held a number of meetings, and my office convened to work out some of these issues, and we were able to do so, which led to the withdrawal of this appeal. I am very happy that both parties have been able to reach an agreement. I would like to make a motion to adopt item ten, affirmed the travertine determination and table items 11 and 12. Do we have a second . Okay. Without objection, item ten is approved unanimously, and items 11 and 12 madame clerk, please call the next one. Items 13 and 14 comprise the board of supervisors to convene in a committee of the whole pursuant to a resolution approved on july 26, 2019 for public hearing to consider the proposed ordinance which is contained in item 14, ordering the street vacation of the entirety of seawall lot 337 and portions, along with Public Service easements with the mission rock project to reserve temporary rights in favor of the city and pg e, subject to conditions specified in the ordinance and adopted a sequel determination and make the appropriate findings. We will now be convening as a committee of the whole, and im open to hearing the streets and Public Service easement vacation order, at mission rock project. Does the district six supervisor wish to make any remarks . Yes, i think most of you are very familiar with this project, i am a cosponsor of this legislation with mayor breen. This is a port of San Francisco project in partnership with, to inspire mission rock is a mixeduse development in the planning process for over ten years. During that decade, the project has engaged in Extensive Community input, received over 74 approval of San Francisco voters, earning unanimous support at every board and commission including the board of supervisors last year. I am excited to help realize this project, because it brings important unneeded Public Benefits, not only to district six but to the broader waterfront of the city. 8 acres of open parks and open space including a signature waterfront park, significant affordable housing, neighborhood retail space and Community Space , construction and permanent jobs of the street vacation legislation before you is administrative in nature, providing additional insurance for the City Development partners against future rightofway claims. I think the staff report is here if there any questions. Do any of the Department Staff wish to make any comments . Seeing none. Are there any members of the public who wish to speak on these items . Come on up. You have two minutes. I would like to speak about it. You talk about affordable housing. I showed you documentation, i believe it was for ten pertaining to redevelopment rules and regulations 415 of all new brandnew apartment buildings, including building at mission rock, is supposed to be 15 for very low and low income bracket people. 15 of 1500 means that 225 of those apartments, and the overall 1500 units for mission rock is supposed to be for very low, and low i demonstrated in front of you, the rest of this board, and president yee how you are not following your own rules and regulations. How come youre not speaking up for that . Then have the nerve to talk about 100 of horrible housing. That is not true. By the same response, you use a female, and her daughter, who is living in a boardinghouse to be your pitch person to advertise commercials, not only on regular tv, but cable tv pertaining to proposition d, which is about affordable housing, for the mission rock complex. Pertaining to the instructions on mission rock says 15 of those apartments are supposed to be for very low and low income bracket people, the people you claim you want to help, and the people that is out of the streets that is homeless. Your pitch person, spanish latino, mexican female who you had on tv throughout the system, for the voters to think that they can afford to live out that mission rock, where you know god damn well that that lady, and her daughter, and then the compound that you are not dealing in good faith, and never had any intentions on reaching a legal agreement on this matter, because you had a schoolteacher say she would love to be a tenant at mission rock, too, she can even afford to live there in her god damn self. How come youre not speaking up for that . Im really upset with you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Okay. Next speaker. I am the treasurer of the Libertarian Party of San Francisco, this proposal last thursday i attended a very disturbing hearing at the department of toxic substance control, regarding the deed covenants, preventing any residential use for the construction of parkland, or facilities involving minors on the site. This covenant has been in place since the year 2,001. What is baffling to me, how you can go through an entire ceqa review, not once mentioned that the mission rock facility is a superfund site and the site of a former toxic waste dump there are dioxins at the site,, with 17 times of the amount allowable by law. There is led, there is hydrocarbons, there is benzene, this site is San Franciscos love canal, if you allow this project to go forward. I was absolutely shocked that the department of toxic substance control, when the department did not go and reevaluate the site for the first time in a quarter of a century. Basically willie brown took some soil testing results, from believe it or not, tetra tech in 1996, shove them in a drawer, and said we are going to use that, 25 years from now, to develop the site go. What have you seen . You have seen mission bay develop right up to the border of the superfund site, and now you have to let it go, you engaged in a lease with pitchman fire. Go google them, they are mafia connected. That is what a racket is brady are taking a brownfield and selling it off as luxury housing, and the taxpayers on the port will be holding the bag when the birth defects and the cancer start to emerge. Thank you. Thank you, next speaker, please. Supervisors, i have come here after some time, there usually a lot all over the place. This mission rock, as the gentleman just stated is very contaminated. Before that, not once do you supervisors admit that all of the lead, the 7. 5 miles that San FranciscoPort Authority has is public trust land. Some of yall havent even read the public trust act. While it is supposed to be for maritime uses, and good uses, as has been suggested by the previous speaker, a superfund site is the worst, of the worst site, because of its contaminants. To call a superfund site of brownfield, it is not right. So the San FranciscoPort Authority was created in the 60s, after the state handed over to the city who in turn created the San FranciscoPort Authority which is an enterprise department. Which will try to make money one way or the other, as it has with at t park, and some others. You are the legislative body, yall have to understand, and be educated on issues, what is happening again and again in the city is that we are allowing developers to build housing on very contaminated soil. We have the precautionary principle, which i am sure none of yall have read, and very few of you are dont understand. Thank you. Next speaker, please. It is time to make this item solid as a rock. Single it is hot, hot, hot. Any other speakers . Seeing none, public, disclose for this item. Supervisor haney, do you have any other remarks . This hearing has been heard, supervisor viewer. Have some questions about the street vacation. Ed has come across this legislative body while i have been in office. I am wondering if there is an opportunity to actually have a powerpoint, on this communication and where it would be, and also the length of time, i think some of this is rather vague. I understand we will also, on our agenda, but in particular since we are talking around mission rock, in an area that is quite frankly only going to get more congested. I am wondering if we can take a moment, colleagues, so sorry to take a moment, to maybe get a brief presentation on what this particular street vacation would entail . I have a copy of the hope at best proposed street vacation, and it actually has a map on it, and it has the scope of the project, public benefit. For this mission rock project i dont have any of that. Im wondering is not available to the board as we review this to vote on this today, or should this be continued for another time . My name is Phil Williamson, i am a senior project manager with the port of San Francisco. Supervisor viewer we do have a presentation we can present to you right now, if you are ready . It is in the board packet. Would that be okay to have a brief presentation . Yes, you asked for it, so go ahead. Are my slides on your screens, or . Thank you. Thank you for the opportunity to present. My name is Phil Williamson and i am with support staff. As mentioned by the supervisor, weve been working on this project for many years. This matter before you today is procedural, we have not found any evidence of publicly accepted street on this property. Our experians shown, over the years, if you do not do a street vacation as a matter of principle, you may be surprised by claims that you did not know about. This is really just a belt and suspenders effort to clear any title issues from the site before he goes to develop it later this year. Quickly, this is only a 45 slide presentation. Definitely have something for you to look at, first of all a pretty picture of the site today , you see the surface parking lot and pier 48 to the left, and then a build out 710 years, depending on market conditions, of course. The site should look like this, or some variation of this new neighborhood called mission rock. These are the items and points of the street vacation we presented at committee. They are in your package as well. I can go to these if you like. Again, just administrative in nature. This lists some of the projects list lists some of the projects and main Public Benefits as far as open space and housing, things we are looking forward to delivering for the whole city in the region. Again, just want to stress the administrative nature of the street vacation request. Regarding a map, the next page shows a map of the site, and again just to be clear, we are asking to vacate the entire site, because we do not show any evidence of public rightofway on the site. The best approach we can take was to assume the whole site should be vacated, from any potential future claims, not having any record. This next slide shows a project schedule. Today is an important step, again clearing title and avoiding any future title issues as we prepare final maps and prepare permits, and get ready to go to construction later this year. That is the short presentation. But if you have any questions i would be glad to answer them. Anybody have any questions. Thank you. I just have one question. Maybe you have provided this, my apologies. How long is the street vacation for . Ever. It is forever . It clears title to the site forever until title changes in the future. Again, the risk to the project, by not doing this is if there was some claim from some prior land owner, or prior user that we were not aware of, or due diligence, this measure would put on record the fact that we had taken the necessary steps to clear any potential street right away claim in the future. Affected parties typically are city municipalities, and also Public Utility Companies like pg e, or the phone company. When this vacation was made public, entities such as pg e came forth and notified us that they had to make women on site. We had to accommodate that equipment to move it around. We are kind of quieting our own title. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Seeing no other speakers. This hearing has been heard, and filed. We are now reconvening as the board of supervisors, do we have a motion on item 14 . Supervisor peskin made a motion to approve item 14, seconded by supervisor, can we take the same house same call without objection . This ordinance passes unanimously on first reading. Madame clerk, please call the next at three special order item. Items 15 and 16 comprise the board of supervisors to convene pursuant to a resolution approved on august 1st, 2019. Fifteen as a public hearing to proposed ordinance subject matter of item 16, ordering vacation street in the sf project phase two and to affirm the ceqa i make the appropriate findings. Colleagues, we are convening as a committee as a whole and open the hearing on this order for arbor trail hope sf project, page two. Does the district supervisor, yes, supervisor walton. Thank you so much. Colleagues, once again, if you recall, hope sf project is the biggest revitalization project we have had here in San Francisco, and it is making sure that we provide adequate rehabilitated, updated, new housing for Public Housing residents in the southeast sector of San Francisco. We have seen some of the new developments, as well as we are working very hard. This is very important. I am cosponsoring this action with mayor breed. This will allow vital Public Housing revitalization to move forward with construction as well as new streets and utilities. This ordinance, was adopted will support the construction of the maximum number of phase two replacement Public Housing units. 157 units in phase two, 619 units in total sitewide, and an uns onsite childcare facility, small open space area and allow for replacement infrastructure. Another thing i want to add that will also provide access from one area to another, Pedestrian Access which is much needed, particularly in this community as people try to maneuver and move around. With that said, i am hoping that we will support this street vacation, and looking forward to action this afternoon. Do any of the Department Staff wish to make any comments . My apologies, we do have a developer here, from bridge housing, as well as representatives, if there any questions, or additional needed information. Any questions . Seeing none, are there any members of the public who wish to speak on these items . All speakers will be allowed to minutes. I want to know what is the ami. When i dealt with you, walton, you told me that you got 100 affordable housing. I asked you pointblank, what is the ami of the projects you have been working on . You told me 15 of the ami. Ami of the income scale that has produced the amount of money that a tenant has to play pay to rent a building, is on or about 49,500, whatever it is that means that the whos got incomes below 50 of the ami, cannot even be a tenant in the building, and cannot even put an application, because their income is not a 50 . That is not affordable housing. I got a problem with that. They view your district, used to be 42 black people. Now its down to about 23 , because of the pricefixing and gouging that is taking place now, you being brainwashed talking about its affordable housing. That is called ethnic cleansing, you use the word, gentrification, and as disgrace of people whos the same damn skin color as yourself ragged is that clear . That is what happened in the field more area, we used to be about when Justin Herman pulled that bull shipped with the redevelop may come talking everybody can move into the film center, he sent the rates higher than the income of the black people that occupy that land. As that clear . Im really upset with you, man. I want you to understand that. You are being brainwashed, about this 600 milliondollar housing bond that you have are senior citizens, when i came up with that idea and pointed out how you never produce housing bond for the most normal people, and by the same response, gordon was the one that responded. Hes the only one. Then you turn around, and president yi is sitting up there trying to hes been on the board for several god damn years and hes never did nothing. Thank you, next speaker, please. Supervisors, you guys need to be educated, all of the property that we are talking about, whether it is hunters view, the novices who come on board, say they are going to represent, they know will. Bs stands for bowl. [chanting] all of those homes are built by the department of defense, they fall 100 times over. Whoever those guys are, the males who made a deal with, bridge developers, the jon stewart company, mercy housing, and so on and so forth, what they want to do, and what they do with intent, his foster gentrification. So, we have this representative, they say they are representing us. They are not representing us. They are wheeling and dealing and they are full of dark money. All of that will come to be, when we shed light. Right now we have Empirical Data we are working with Law Enforcement, on every angle, and hopefully the city, the different people in the city whose heart is in the right place, will support us, and being about an audit. Once an audit is done, all of these rascals, these roaches, they will shed light on the roaches, and we will reveal the truth. Next speaker, please. [singing] single we like hope, sunshine. And we it along. Single foes we need hope and sunshine, pres being at a long and now you are back from being gone. Single i know, i know, i know, i know single make it shine all along. Any other speakers . Public comment is now closed. Any other remarks . One thing i just want to be clear, this is actually not affordable housing, Public Housing. The ami is much closer lower than typical affordable housing, just for clarity. Seeing no other speakers, this hearing has been heard. We are now reconvening as the board of supervisors. Do we have a motion on item 16 . Seconded by supervisor haney. Colleagues, can we approve item 16, same house, same call. This ordinance passes unanimously in first reading. Madame clerk, i think we did. [roll call] already. Lets go to item 18, Public Comment. Item 18 is Public Comment. The public may address the entire board of supervisors for up to two minutes, for items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board to include the approval of the minutes, to approve items 2023 on the adoption without reference to committee calendar. I want to specifically. Out item 23, whether or not the board should enter into closed session today to receive advice from the City Attorney regarding the city litigation with pg e. That is the item you will be hearing about in a moment. Public comment is not allowed when an item has been previously subject to Public Comment. Direct your remarks to the board as a whole, not into individual members. Speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed twice the amount of time. If you would like to display a document on the overhead projector, please clearly state such. When you would like the screen to return to live coverage, just return the document. Shalom to you. I am a resident, i am truly thankful to be here once again, after the murder of my son. The reason that i am here, is i have been doing Community Work care in San Francisco, with activism and social justice issues for almost 30 years. Ive had the privilege to run for the board of supervisors, with supervisor walton. We did a great job. I knew that it was meant for me to run. The issue is, the community has been coming to me constantly asking for my assistance. Someone had a vision, and the vision was that they saw me here , in this building, city hall with an office. I have been meditating on it, and i knew that it was meant. Someone had a vision that i had ran, and i won. Im not a political person, everyone knows that. I have the courage to speak the truth, concerning the injustices that are happening here in San Francisco, and the United States of america. I spoke with the mayor, in regards to requesting that a stipend trust fund be set aside in memory of the africanamerican arts and cultural district that is also called bayview hunters point. I am asking for you to provide that stipend trust fund so we are able to represent the culture that we need to deal with in bayview hunters point. I am requesting that we have an office here in the name of cultural affairs, and being able to just once again talk about the curriculum that we need to deal with the quality act that you made into existence. This is just the beginning, and i wanted to introduce myself to you so we can begin this dialogue in the name of the africanamerican art and cultural district. I am the reason why the polls are done, working with former supervisor coleman. I have here with me, two beautiful activists that have been fighting for many years who would want to be a part of that trust fund, and they would like to speak. Thank you. My name is olivia boudreau, i am here to speak on homelessness which i am a candidate at this time currently. I have been working with my elective supervisor, who referred me to several places, and im not able to get legal representation, at this time. We have a local funded service in the bayview, which is opendoor legal, who has refused to represent me currently. Related matters. [inaudible] they openly break the law. Im an advocate, taxpayer and abiding citizen, which i have lived in the bayview all my life. Hopefully someone, on the board, can maybe help get me legal representation so me and my family will not be homeless. Thank you. Good afternoon, i am a resident of the Bayview District, district ten, we have new management, over four property sites. Bayview apartments, which is district ten, and i am begging and pleading with all of you supervisors to come together for district ten, and stop the epidemic, what is going on up here in bayview, regarding the africanamericans, they are doing a legal convictions, they are not giving residents recertification, they make appointments for other residents to have the recertification then they put it off, they put it off and then they make like the residents are not coming for the recertification. They are harassing the residents up there. I am also a victim of harassment appear, because i stand for the residents and city hall has helped me, i deal with psychology, and for the trash appear, they help to me, but now this new company that has come back, has started the same situation, and i just beg and plead that all of you districts please help walton, to help what is going up there on the hill. It is really an epidemic and he need needs some help. I am also with the ambassador [inaudible] also, have been cut down to my income of 520 per month. I am a longshoreman, they are verbally, mentally, emotionally, physically abusing these residents up there. Something needs to happen. Please, i am begging and pleading, for the districts to step in and help walton with this epidemic that is happening in Bayview District ten. Thank you. I am here, i had a talk with her who is an advocate, and her heart is in the right place. In the bayview, we had the bayview opera house, which was saved by ruth williams. Today we have a white woman, i have nothing against white women , but we have a white woman called barbara walker, who seems to know more about the culture of africanamericans, it is good that she is here, i have not done this before, but i asked her to stand here, because she should be made a director to run the bayview opera house, and given the necessary funds to do whatever the other ladies who are standing behind want to do. We have Community Benefits, over 600 million, we can have all of the people that need help in the bayview. All of the city administrators know about it, including the mayors. But we have people who are dipping into our Community Benefits for reasons, and for users that are not beneficial to the community. Here you have this lady, she can be bedded out, and given an opportunity to read the bayview opera house so that the culture, when you talk about culture, you have to get deep into it. It has to be deep into your dna. Most of you do not know one thing, i was born in nairobi, kenya. I speak 30 african languages. I dont tell this to too many people. We have people here, in the chamber that are not culturally competent. Thank you very much. Next speaker, please. How are you doing . Im glad you guys made it back off your vacation. My name is Queen Vanessa banks. I am six months from 50, i am a native of bayview at this point. We all are being attacked. We are being attacked from different entities, i have another letter on my attack, and to also mayor lender breed. I will be going on ppo at 5 00 p. M. , and i will be public announcing what is happening to bayview hunters point. We need you all to understand that just because there are new people coming into our community, it does not give people the right to outcast and do the natives wrong. We are natives out here, this is it mayor lender breed city, this is all of our cities. We ask yall to step up, they get tired of coming down her and asking yall what you already know. We should not be under attack, no Law Enforcement entities, we should not be attacked through jon stewart, we should not be attacked through any of these private developers coming in. They know our people up there in a crisis. Some of our people of their cant even read or write. What is the city going to do to help them families up there. Ive been spending all week with these women back here. Trying to figure out a way to organize ourselves, so we can come down here and explain to you all, we are under attack. It is not fair, it is unacceptable. The micro aggression and Everything Else going on out there and hunters point. Either yall are going to stop it or were going to stop it, have a good day. Next speaker, please. Thats an example how they need a voice. They need somebody that is incredible, combination of state law and federal law that are more powerful and equal to the United States of america, u. S. Attorney general. Somebody that knows the combination of state law, and fellow law pertaining to the constitutional law. All of these testimonies you just heard is proof that black people is being discriminated in the bayview on a class action level, a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A corrupt enterprise where you deprive black people of the constitutional right to pertain to due process and equal protection under the law. That is not equal protection by means of displacing black people from their origination housing location with higher income developments, and price in them out of the markets where they cant afford to live in the locations that they were born. That is called pricefixing, and price gouging. You are in violation of that, too. Is that clear . You are in violation of 18 to 41 where you are depriving people of their civil rights, if that demonstration is completed in front of the Federal District court judge comey you not be fined more than 10,000 cash money and sure not serve a prison term in a federal penitentiary. Csr coming at you like that with this type of testimony in front of a Federal District court judge, and then put you up there on the witness stand, demonstrate that you are not doing a god damn you cant say that you dont know about it, because theyve been coming down here to city god damn hall telling you about it. As that clear . Are you hearing me, peskin . Oh, yeah. I have a question for you too, how did you end up being fined 8,000 . It doesnt work like that, michael. Have a question about that, too. I have a problem with that, too. Walton, you need to put together a task force and get these people that is discriminating thank you. Next speaker, please. Keep your comments directed to the board as a whole and not to individual members. Thank you. Jesus stands alone. In all of history, there is nobody remotely close to the man christ jesus. He said, have greater witness than that of john. That is john chapter five. John the baptist was very unique individual, because to profits spoke about him, hundreds of years before he was born. When jesus said, i have greater witness than john. Think about this. 700 years before christ was born, the prophet said for unto us, a child is born. Unto us a son is given. His gender male. There is only male and female. The government should be upon his shoulder. His name should be called wonderful. Counselor, the mighty god, the everlasting father, the prince of peace, the increase of his government and peace there should be no end upon the throne of david, and upon his kingdom to order it, and establish it with judgment and justice, from henceforth, even forever, the seal of the lord of hosts has performed this. I was listening to george norad, couple nights ago, jonathan con, and he wrote a book called the harbinger. He brings up a point, when daschle got up there and quoted the verse, in isaiah, it was actually two verses after what i quoted you. He didnt realize that he was a prophet like caiaphas. He made a statement about the substitutionary death of christ, he had no idea what he was actually saying. Jesus died for our sins, see . He died for our sins, according to the scriptures area scriptures. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. [singing] the station has been named rose pak, i want to welcome you back. Where there is love, i will be there. Get back supervisors, get back. Get back to your city hall job where you belong. Get back, get back, get back and youre are going to be strong. Get back, supervisors. The mayor is waiting for you. Shes wearing her red sweater, and her nice pearls. I have the graphics for sfgovtv. A great year for San Francisco, 72. [singing] its been a long time, been a long, long time. Since weve seen a district dime. Been a long time, in a long time , been a long, long time, gonna make it shine. Been a long time, been a long time, been a long time. Youre going to make it turn out fine. Thank you, and welcome back. Next speaker, please. My name is mark darrell cox. , the previous speaker, he was talking about scripture. [please stand by] in 2026, 2001 began the third generation. The fourth generation begins in 2026. This country will lose six cities. San francisco will be lost by water. You better build refugee camps. San diego will be lost by water in 2026. After those two cities, by water destroyed, chicago and dallas will be destroyed by wind next speaker, please. Next speaker. [indiscernible] go ahead. Hello, supervisors