Equity review this project has been delayed to undergo reviews for five years now and im concerned that the equity impact of those delays is not even being considered at all because every day that this project gets delayed and more housing is not filled and these 1 billion in Community Benefits is not paid to the city, its a day that people will not live with shelter and the city will face a budget crunch. Furthermore, i want to ask the board of supervisors as we look through racist planning, why i havent seen proposal to up said the west side westportal Saint Francis wood, these are white and exclusionary neighborhoods with Single Family zoning right next to money munitations that e you in the train in 15 minutes. As we look a lot i support the removing the central free and it should be a part of this broader shift towards equity and planning and zoning. Thank you. You will be notified you have been unmuted and you may begin your comments. Caller hell oh i would like to express my support for the proposed hub rezoning for the 98 franklin street development. I have been a San Francisco resident and worker for about 21 years and i also own a Small Business in the city, a local business enterprise. Im also the children born and raised in San Francisco and all three are attending primary and middle school at french american international. I think this will provide Affordable Housing as well as more school mixed use income in a trance see enter oriented area its what the city needs. Again i give my support. Thank you. Thank you, next speaker, please. Youll have two minutes. My name is an gel i caal geld im calling in support of the amended hub area plan being proposed by supervisor preston. Our coalition is supportive of approvalling this phase 1 area plan which is a narrow area plan that moves forward three key sites van ness and 98 franklin streets. Approving these three sites does not mean the over all hub plan is go ahead to go. The hub area plan over lays communities living in d5, d9 and d6 there are still a lot of analysis that need to be done to ensure we have an equitable plan to mitigate the massive negative impact of this area plan and having the Planning Department examine the potential Socioeconomic Impact of the proposed development on our low income and working plans and particularly residents living in the central city is the right step forward to uphold the commitment to make a Commission Resolution number 20738. Its nice to hear your city staff acknowledging the equity assessment, its a step backwards to approve a whole area plan and go back later to incorporate what the consultants identified with Community Groups. This kind of backward steps is snowball effect. Negative i have total tax break all over again in eastern neighborhoods and we need to not only address the housing crisis which Market Rate Development has not helped. About what we need is a real equity plan that will ensure that all of our existing communities will continue to live, thrive and i ask you support the proposed amended area plan that our essential City Coalition worked to achieve. Thank you. Thank you, next speaker, please. You will be notified that youve been unmuted and you may begin. Good afternoon, supervisors peskin, safai and preston. This is anna tay sha district 8 member of San FranciscoTenants Union and central citys coalition. The central citys coalition advocates for adoption of a phased approach to development in the hub area plan that provides for approval of the three Key Development rights, situated in the plan, that has been submitted and are in the process of a project approval, namely 10 south van ness and 98 franklin. The three projects proposed for approval has met with the community over the last several months of Community Process was followed. Developers came to the table and agreed to confer sufficient Community Benefits to these developed in the hub area plan. These Community Benefits go above and beyond what is required and help mitigate the negative impacts posed by the developments. Other projects in the area plan could be considered in the future when the framework of a race and social equity assessment thats in the process of development by the central City Coalition is completed. The framework will be the basis for a race and social equity study that advises modifications to the hub area plan. And implemented to mitigate potential harms to tenants, businesses, at risk of displacement, harm to vulnerable low income, working class and people of color. I ask you to move the amended hub area plan that our central City Coalition has worked to achieve forward as Committee Report to the full board. Thank you. Thank you, next speaker, please. Caller good afternoon, supervisors. My name is Jason Henderson. I am a cochair of the market in Octavia Community Advisory Committee and chair of Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association transportation and planning committee. Speaking for myself i support the phased approach and its creative and its needed. Dont forget that much of the eastern side of of district five is rentcontrolled tenants who are baring the burden of regional traffic, incredible amounts of traffic. So, with this post pandemic environment that the urban realm plan is not sufficient. We need to have wider sidewalks and bike lanes that provide northsouth access between the mission and the civic center and western edition. We cant just let this become privatized mobility with ubers and lyft and ecommerce saturating this area. We can reduce the parking and i would urge an interim parking control while the planning process Racial Equity analysis is underway and keep it as it is. 25. Go to the interim control we did in 2017. Extend car free market to goff because you will be seeing a lot of vehicles converging on 12th street and thats not good. And lastly, i think accelerating freeway removal is critical because we need housing and that is suitable land for plentiful housing and open space. So, im pleased to see that that is thank you for your comments. You have two minutes to speak. You will be notified you have been unmuted and you may begin. Caller hello. Hi, thank you. Good afternoon, board of supervisors. My name is claire and i am a member of so many cam and i am here today as a long time district 6 resident. I was born and raised in the tenderloin and my family moved here from the philippines after world war ii and they live in the neighborhood today and weve been struggle to go stay since. Im calling in for representation of phasing in the hub area plan except for the inaudible site. Until a thorough racial analysis is complete and i want to let it be known this is not Anti Development but creating a Community Process. A Community Planning process. That puts equity in the forefront of land use making decisions because we have seen how past plans like the twitter tax breaks and eastern neighborhoods plan have failed black and brown workingclass communities. If we do it correctly a racial and social Equity Analysis can be an effective tool how assess the development will impact the tenderloin. Planning is subject to the inaudible and currently and in this process and when we talk about inaudible neighborhoods, we need to address up zoning for violent and harmful acts and it should be a requirement to conduct a Racial Equity study to see how it will impact brack black and brown communities and the same way that Environmental Impact reports are required for any projects. This moment is our opportunity to hold this city accountable for correcting racist planning policies of the past and this is more than just housing its about equity and having a feet at the table and our folks staying and see a future here. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. You have two minutes and you will be notified youve been unmuted. Caller hello, inaudible . Can you hear me . Yes, go ahead. Caller hi name is martin and im calling from you district 5. So, i want to center the discussion here on the delay and all the Infrastructure Improvements that are part of the hub package. Were talking about a billion dollars of street and infrastructure safety improvements. I do support a Racial Equity study as a ex immigrant member of this community and a tenant myself i understood the need for that, however, i believe that Racial Equity has to be centered on street improvements and because street violence including car crashes, and other collisions that occur on our streets, especially in the hub area, do impact people of color more than any other groups. So, i do support, for example, tearing down the freeway and building Affordable Housing there however i think if this plan is being delayed in order to stop the growth in this area, i want to remind folks na the area already is accepted for high density and highrise development and stopping this plan would stop the street improvements and the transit improvements and stop the street scape improvements so ultimately the decision has to be how do we exceed the project goals and not how do we stop this up zoning because the up zoning will improve the lives of everything in this city if we do invest the Community Benefits into the street improvements that are part of the plan currently. Im ok as long as it is not a delay indefinitely. The central freeway being removed should be part of this plan, thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. You will have two minutes to speak. Good afternoon, supervisors, my name is theo and im a renter in San Francisco and i share of San Francisco and i want to call in on behalf to support these three planned projects in the hub and looking forward to moving quickly forward with the wrest. After the equity study. We absolutely need more housing and we node more housing of every income level. Its easy to say lets not move during covid, lets pump the breaks or slow down, but who needs places to raise our families, we need this housing now. On the equity side, i want to ask why are we only talking about projects in large being built in soma and the mission. Supervisor preston, we live a couple blocks from each other and i want to know the wealthy part of district 5 places like alamo square, i live in an Apartment Building in this area built in the 1920s but we dont build those and why not . Isnt that the equity view is that we should be building more housing on the western parts of the city and central parts of the city not just move all that development into soma and the mission. Lets get more housing built. Lets do it in our neighborhoods. And i ask supervisor preston to show us you can say yes to housing and demolish the ways to zoning we only allow Apartment Buildings in soma and the mission. District five say great neighborhood to live in and we can have a lot more neighbors living here. So, please, you know, show this and take leadership and up zone the west side of the city. Theres no reason why our zoning maps should map our old red lining maps. Its a clear racist legacy and we should undue that. Thank you and please move forward with these three projects. Thank you for your comments. Again, members of the public who wish to provide Public Comment can call into 451 6550001. The meeting i. D. Is 1469224815. Press pound and pound again. If you have not done so, please press star 3 to lineup to speak. You have raised your hand. Just wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted and you may begin your comments. Next speaker, please. Caller good afternoon, supervisor. I am with some can. Its a member of the central City Coalition is ensuring we have more equitable San Francisco that will project and enhance the ability for our working class communities of colors to continue to exist, live and work within the spaces that our greatest and maintain this this city and im calling in for the proposed by supervisor preston and our coalition is supportive of approving this phase 1 hub and area planning which is now a narrow area one that moves forward and inaudible . We dont agree the city approving the whole entire hub plan without first looking at race and equity impacts. Its crucial that the rate and equity assessment is done before we pine for phase 2 of the hub area. And we are passing that will help sent prevent the harm to working class communities. Again, i ask that we support proposed the amended area that our central City Coalition has worked to achieve. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. You may begin your communities. Caller hello. May i proceed. Yes, maam. Caller thank you, maam. I want to provide i am inaudible . I am a member of the filipino community. Operations. And calling in the support of inaudible for the phasing in the hub area plans except for the three inaudible until the analysis is complete. This recommendation is not untied development. Rather, it is the Community Planning process needed to strengthen the equity first framework to be housing for all. Its social equity report. Some can debate use as an effective tool and assess how new development this is the hub plan area impacts the stock market and tenderloin. We have given inequity and seen how they turn neighborhood plans away from the communities. Which post negative made by market rates development and to low income and working class and color and diversity. It is our opportunity to hall the ct and some for accountable for connecting racist running policies. Having homes is more than just Affordable Housing. Having a home is providing the most population and over all benefits from neighborhoods planning policies and that they have an agreed able seat at the table. I strongly took fourth your time has expired. Thank you, maam. Good afternoon, supervisor, my name is lorenzo with the tenderloin congress a member of the central civic coalition. The reason i called is to express our support for the amended market and octavia area map. Being proposed by supervisor preston. Its kong convinced its important to look at equity to ensure the question of equity is suck stan shalsubstantially add. It also includes the approval of the three Key Development sites at 10 south van ness. The developer of this street projects have worked with the communities to provide substantial Community Benefits that will have mitigate their negative impact. The tenderloin people believe in the importance of Community Planning process to strengthen and the equity first framework to build housing for all san franciscans. We believe theres no way to be con student so we strongly support the proposed amended area plans. We believe this is the right thing to do and under the principles of inclusion, equity and democracy. Thank you so much. Thank you, next speaker, please. You have two minutes. Yes, hi. Good afternoon. This is Tracy Rosenberg and im from Media Alliance and were a constituent group with united to save the miss. Im calling in in support of the phased in hub plan and requesting a comprehensive race and social equity assessment before the entire hub plan is adopted. The eastern neighborhoods plan has been deeply problematic as we all know. Weve been seeing the bad effects for years and its important that we go forward in a different and better fashion. We need an inclusion i have planning process with equity at the forefront and impacted community have to be at the table. We cant keep repeating mistakes that have gotten us to our current place with massive displacement and probably, i believe, we in an article as the most general fied city in the country. As a legacy nonprofit organizations, we were founded here in san in 1976 and we never intended to be anywhere else but in 2005, we had to leave this city because we couldnt pay the rent. And i was only lucky and happy that we were able to come back in 2015 and nothing to the nonprofit. Development. But we were lucky and most of Community Groups and members of the and the San Francisco we came back to is not the San Francisco that we left. So, lets stop here is look at doing things in a different and report and analysis. Thank you for your comments. We have 24 listeners and 12 in cue. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon supervisors. Kelly hill with united to save the mission and part of the central citys coalition. Im calling in hub plan being proposed by supervisor preston. We support passing a plan that moves forward the sites as those are the only three proposed development this is the that will help the warm of working class communities. For me when i lock at the massing 3d diagram and the eir you can see the level of scope and the potential impact that that plan is going to have on the built environment. And the north side its vulnerable residential spaces and dangers of indirect displacement as the plan goes into effect. We must effect that existing Vulnerable Housing within anna jays enter to the hub and the in Center Section of the hub, along market, i see large projects already under construction and we see at least nine long Time Community serving businesses already displaced due to the new construction. 1554 market and 1629 market and 30odes we see 1,000 under construction. We support the labor and union folks on the job. Im concerned that weve already lost at least nine working class businesses along otus street that were open for business in the low and moderate income communities of color. We dont know the full impact of this yet. On the same side of the plan, this is where i feel we need to row visit the hsd and Work Together for stronger protection and modify the process that could lockout Community Participation and planning. I wont go parcel by parcel but several up zone sites include the largest Hardware Store in the city and a large Restaurant Supply as well as numerous other businesses crucial to racial diversity in this community. Its important to be able to edge gain in the Community Planning process when large projects are slated thank you so much for yu your comments. Next speaker please. Youll have two minutes and you will be notified your line is unmuted and you may begin. Hell hoe, hi. Hello supervisors. My name is inaudible . And were calling in support of the recommendation of phasing the ehub area plan except for the three sites we havent discussed. Until we do a thorough racial and social Equity Analysis, we dont have to look too far back to see the equity eastern neighborhood plan that has destroyed our community. Theres 8,000 latin residents with the mission and hundreds of small nonprofit businesses artists and working class manufacturing. We are in a historic walk shed movement with white blacks matter intended or non intended. This moment is our opportunity for the city of San Francisco to be accountable for correcting racist planning policies. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. Next speaker, please. Caller supervisors, this is jim and im on the board of the civic Center Benefit district which is one of the on site Community Groups that you havent mentioned. We have worked closely with the three developers, a couple of them are on our board. On related to the pedestrian aspect and the facility of the groundfloor of the building and theyre happy with them. We did that many months before you got involved. I want to point out that in the past five years, nine developments have been progress 2700 units of housing. With affordable units. These units are already there and taking up a lot of the parcels that are already there. Of the list of 18 that you are dealing with, if you eliminate the three that under construction and the three we talked about thats 12. Three are owned by the city and one of them is owned by the Community College district, and two of them are very viable businesses so leaves you with eight small warehouses that are either under utilized or empty. This whole to do is the over blown as to what you are talking about. The important thing is to move this thing forward, particularly the parts of the plan that deal with the pedestrian environment and you dont need to hold that up because its been worked out really well. So, do whatever you are going to do but lets think about getting this together and when you do your studies, you are going to find theres not that many pieces of property to worry about. Thank you. Thank you, next speaker, please. We have 21 listeners and eight in queue. Hi, there. My name is samantha and im a resident of the district 5. And im calling to speak in favor of the hub projects and the 98 franklin project. I was in district five for the better part of a decade now and ive been a neighbor of the french american schools for about a year and a half now and theres no other organization is would trust with a project like this as much as i trust them. Theyve been fantastic neighbors and they engage the communities in ways didnt expect when i moved here. This is exactly the sort of mixed use mixed income kind of Transit Oriented Development plan that i was hoping for when i voted for denser housing in all of the ballot initiatives. So, im excited to support it and i am glad this is moving forward. Thank you so much. Thank you, next speaker, please. Caller hello. This is pat. I am a d5 resident and member of the inaudible coalition. This hub project overlaps three different inaudible . Raising social equity is an important thing that should happen before more of the hub area is up zoned and benefits given to developers. Ask that those should only follow after the community that shows what benefits it wants. Planning has been very good at building buildings but how much are occupied . We got people who we walk home with its true and we got building thats have been built. So which need to do a little more thoughtful planning that clearly the value of neighborhoods and neighborhoods, people who have businesses they can go to, services that they can go to and non profits and events, and people where they can feel at home and will not have people calling them out for being black in a white area. You need to be better. Support san franciscans and keeping our san franciscans here. I supports comments by supervisor preston and other city comments. Phased approach, please. Thank you. Thank you, members of the public who wish to provide Public Comment should call 415 6550001 and the meeting i. D. Is 1469224815. Press pound and pound again. If you have not done so already, please press star 3 to lineup to speak. A system prompt will indicate that you have raised your hand, please wait for to indicate you have been unmuted and you may begin your comments. For those already in line, thank you for waiting, next speaker, please. Caller hello, supervisors. John from the San Francisco mission district. And a member of the central City Coalition. Our Coalition Led primarily by working class communities of color has been working on this plan for well over a year and a half. We have spent that time attending community meetings, combing through documents, and assessing what the path forward could be. Its why were calling in informed to voice our support for the amended area plan that is being proposed to you by supervisor preston. This allows us to phase in an area plan that is being passed at one of the most Uncertain Times in american history. It is also a time where our country is reckoning with the Structural Racism that is pervasive in every facet of society, especially in land use and planning. The phase plan before you brings with it three key sites that have all met with our community stakeel horse over several months and ensure we produce the needed benefits and the mitigate the negative impacts that developments can have on working class communities. We have won working on a social equity ceasement being led and we want to ensure were looking at future developments and area plans through a true lens of racial and social equity. This assessment will allow us to look at a future phase 2 of the hub area plan and ensure we were building an area that is truly help encompass a plan for us. Supervisor preston, i would like to thank you, your office, in particular, kyle sil smiley as e look forward to the work ahead. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Your long time resident and member of the senior disability action. I approve the efforts to allow the first street projects to go ahead will not slow down the hub. If the supervisors today and tomorrow support supervisor prestons amendments and essential citys coalition plans, for a racial and social justice setting, this could be the first day of a new and equitable future for San Francisco planning. That would be a future in which the people effected by the construction there have a choice in its creation. Thank you. Thank you next speaker, please. Caller good afternoon. I live in d9. And i have been looking at this hub plan carefully and i was reading defunding strategies and it was previously proposed and it showed the hub area could have 2200 affordable units. I thought it was exciting and we definitely dont want to loose that and i was looking at Affordable Housing, 682 million worth of transit and 116 million worth and parks and recreations are 32 million and complete streets 71 million and school and childcare 75 mends. Its a billion dollars in benefits we dont want to loose and its the reason that sensitive communities like mine and others are concerned here is because were really needing to start looking as as the Planning Commission is a ban on Zoning Ordinance thats c co hab tate multi Family Housing on large lots. These rules prevent both lower income and middleclass families from settling in affluent neighborhoods, exclusionary Zoning Ordinances were partly motivated by institution tonal and banning those, its not only good policy but constitutionally permissable if not at the something that goal governments can do if theres a political will to do so. Thank you. Thank you for your comments. We have 21 listeners with four in queue. We are living in different times. Covid has effected business whos live in these districts that overlap the neighborhood. I know a lot of people are advocating for Affordable Housing but what is the use of Affordable Housing when the neighborhood will feel like a portrait to residents and communities of color. Where a Community Retail and business floor space makes us feel unsafe. Where people who just moved into the bay area are calling cops on unhoused populations and people of color many of this is a part of our Environmental Impact report and and its important to pause or phase in. Caller i live in district 5. The fear the plan study will be limited in its scope. The most equitable results of an equity study would be a position to up zone the west side instead of the hub and we should examine not just where wore changing zoning but wore where were not changing the zoning. There were two homes valued at 2. 5 million that have been sold in the district and the Median Income is over 100,000. We should make changes there. In january, i attended a meeting of the west of between Peaks Central Council where leaders of the Neighborhood Association expressed shock and state legislation and it could tall and lower income residents and black indigenous and people of color. It didnt cause direct displacement but it has sim here to ask you to support the amended hub area plan as proposed by supervisor preston. Early earlier we heard an ordinance from supervisor ronen to fix issues in the planning code and address indirect arms that were not mitigate in the eastern neighborhoods plan. You have all witnessed the devastation of the mission [ lost audio ] that completes the queue. Can you. Mr. Chair. I believe there may be one more caller on the line. Thank you. Hello, caller, you have two minutes. Good afternoon chair peskin and members of the Land Use Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. My name is casandra and they bring together people from many cultures and backgrounds just like the make up of San Francisco. And we have been part of this School Community for the past seven years and and 98 franklin mixeduse development and i want to take the opportunity to commend the city and the community and planning staff for all their hard work on this important project. It takes a long time to get to the point of project were at today. This project provides a uniqu unique thats really been a staple in San Francisco for families for decades. This project has gone through a long approval process and the International Community of french american has worked with the city and the community for the past five years to make 98 franklin and the hub a reality. So i strongly encourage you to support the project today. So that we can move forward and deliver the various improvements it promises to the community and the city as a whole. Thank you so much. Thank you, next speaker, please. This is the fourth time ive been kicked off this call. When Mission Residents raise the issues before the eastern neighborhoods plan was adopted, we were told that it would be adequately addressed later. It never was and were still fighting for equity while displacement and trauma increases expo te exponentially. The Planning Department has not performed racial ini can equity study. The fact we stand before you and state theres no directive placement from this plan demonstrates the inadequacy of their understanding of impacts on communities of color and our need for this study first before moving towards final adoption. Let today be the day that his to be yans referred to as the moment in time when this Land Use Committee ushered in a new era for San Francisco. That from this day forward, all major planning hood changes will require rates and equity study and assessment of the impacts that are revealed and they will be central to proposing mitigations for direct and indirect harms. And then no area plan will ever move forward to final adoption without that lense. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Caller were debating displacement and gentrification. Im concerned with racial and culture equity in those communities that have seen dramatic changes. Theres a way to get us on the same page. Look at where we built housing in the city. Its overwhelmingly focused in the same Community Concern it has been for decades. That map say perfect modern reflection of the racist red lining formally outlawed in 1968 and still very much alive. In 2019, 317 units were built in the mission and over 2800 units were built in soma but just four were built in the sunset. Four. If you are so concerned about the inequitable impacts on the hub you must know how unfairly housing is disability tries uted across the city but on this subject, you are silent and we can build thousand of new homes in the city while elevateing and protecting these communities that are expendable. If you are serious about housing equity, fight to up zone the rest of the city as hard as you fought to slow down the hub and i will be thrilled to join you. That completes the queue. Thank you. Colleagues, are there anymore questions or comments on items 58 . Chair peskin yeah, id like to run through if supervisor safai or any other questions before we do that and im happy to do that i believe supervisor safai had to leave so i would like to make a motion to excuse supervisor safai. On the motion to excuse supervisor safai, supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. You have two ayes. Great, that motion passes. Supervisor preston. Thank you. And i want to thank everyone who called in and interests been a lot of moving parts and i want to give particular thanks to john jacobo, carlos, tess, david woo, Jason Henderson among many others who have helped our office to understand the concerns and the implications of the various pieces of the legislation here. Also, the folks with United States mission and central city and coalition and also our offices a he i mentioned before worked collaboratively my legislative i dont know if you have an order in which we take these in terms of voting and are tick latin articulating. So, please, dean, go ahead. I think the amendments are solid. So, go ahead. Right. Great. And ill keep the summary brief. So im going to start with item number 6 on the agenda. File number 200556 and would like to coupe date the file and continue the original file to the call of the chair and make several amendments. Do i need a motion chair peskin to continue the item to the call of the chair . Before making . You can dislocate the file and you can coupe la indicate the file and we can vote on any amendments there too. So, for the amendments to the file on that and section 2a pages 49 removing rezoning of parcels from nct3 and removing height increases for all parcels and and last section 2c pages 12 through 16 removing the expansion of the rusd except for a small portion of 10 south ns project site that is outside the sud, a move to amend that item. Hold on a second. The file has been duplicated, correct . Correct. Before amendment. And then the second file has been amended, correct . And were voting that has been amended, is that correct . We can take that vote first, yes. Ok. As amended. We will also need a motion on the original pre amendment version to continue to call the chair. Right now were doing the duplicated file as amended and is that the vote im about to vote on . Yes. All right. Clerk on the duplicate file has amended, supervisor preston. Aye. Preston aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. Clerk you have two ayes. And clerk would you like to vote on the remaining balance of the duplicate. The duplicate legislation to recommend as amended. Supervisor preston . To be continued to the cause of the chair . Let me clarify to make sure im getting this right. We duplicated the file. We amended the duplicate and theyve been taken and we are moving the amended file with recommendation as Committee Report . Clerk yes. You are totally inaudible . Madam clerk, may i intervene. The duplicate file is since you are sending it out as a Committee Report, it should be the original file that gets amended because its the file on the board agenda. The duplicate you should continue to the call of the chair. Thank you. In that event, do we need to undo we need to rescind the previous vote to amend the duplicate. Ill make a motion to rescind the previous vote. Can we do that without objection . Yes. So moved. We duplicate the file and now we need to amend the original as previously stated. On the motion to on the motion to amend on the motion to amend the original legislation, as stated by supervisor preston, supervisor peskin. Aye. Supervisor preston. Aye. You have two ayes. You want to send it to the board with recommendations. Yes. As a Committee Report. On the motion as stated by supervisor preston, supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. Peskin aye. You have two ayes. And then the last step to move to continue the duplicated file here. On the motion as stated, supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. You have two ayes. Thank you. Madam clerk, is there anymore business we have one more item that will require amendment and two more that we need to move. So turning to agenda item number 8, file number 200559. Again, to duplicate the file and the following amendments for the original. Amend the option for provision of Affordable Housing fees to clarify methodology and align with other provisions the ordinance for calculating fee equivalency that is as previous distributed on page 16 line 811 and page 16 lines 1217. Also, amend Planning Department reporting requirements from annually to quarterly for the van ness and Market CommunityFacilities Fund that is on page 38 line 35. To strike quote to the Planning Commission on the current status of the funds and add quote quarterly to the Planning Commission on the current status of the fund as well as closed quotes. And that is is so moved to make those amendments. Thank you, supervisor. In receipt of those amendments, madam clerk, roll call, please. Clerk on the motion to amend the original legislation as stated by supervisor preston, supervisor preston. Aye. Preston aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. Peskin aye. You have two acetaminophen. And then chair peskin i move to forward the item as amended. With recommendations of Committee Report to the full board. Madam clerk. Roll call, please. On the motion as stated supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. You have two ayes. And finally for that item, motion to continue the duplicate file for the call of the chair. Madam clear madam clerk wo deal with this in the next six months, roll call, please. Clerk on the motion for the duplicate to continue to the call of the chair, supervisor preston. Aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. You have two ayes. Supervisor peskin for the third item number 5 on the agenda file 200557 the general plan amendment for this item no amendments or duplication necessary and move to forward that item as to the report with recommendations. Dean, i think we already did that. Madam clerk, did we not do that . We have that left as well as item number 7. Got it. Ok. Roll call, please. On the motion to recommend item number 5 supervisor preston . Aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. You have two ayes. And then the 200558. Thank you. For that item, which is the housing sustainability district that item moved to continue that item to the call of chair. Roll call, place. On the motion as stated by supervisor preston, supervisor preston. Aye. Preston aye. Supervisor peskin. Aye. Peskin aye, you have two ayes. Are there anymore matters before this body . That completes the agenda. We are adjourned. Is our United States constitution requires every ten years that america counts every human being in the United States, which is incredibly important for many reasons. Its important for preliminary representation because if Political Representation because if we under count california, we get less representatives in congress. Its important for San Francisco because if we dont have all of the people in our city, if we dont have all of the folks in california, california and San Francisco stand to lose billions of dollars in funding. Its really important to the city of San Francisco that the federal government gets the count right, so weve created count sf to motivate all sf count to motivate all citizens to participate in the census. For the immigrant community, a lot of people arent sure whether they should take part, whether this is something for u. S. Citizens or whether its something for anybody whos in the yUnited States, and it is something for everybody. Census counts the entire population. Weve given out 2 million to over 30 communitybased organizations to help people do the census in the communities where they live and work. Weve also partnered with the Public Libraries here in the city and also the Public Schools to make sure there are informational materials to make sure the folks do the census at those sites, as well, and weve initiated a campaign to motivate the citizens and make sure they participate in census 2020. Because of the language issues that many Chinese Community and families experience, there is a lot of mistrust in the federal government and whether their private information will be kept private and confidential. So its really important that communities like bayviewhunters point participate because in the past, theyve been under counted, so what that means is that funding that should have gone to these communities, it wasnt enough. Were going to help educate people in the tenderloin, the multicultural residents of the tenderloin. You know, any one of our given blocks, theres 35 different languages spoken, so we are the original u. N. Of San Francisco. So its our job is to educate people and be able to familiarize themselves on doing this census. You go online and do the census. Its available in 13 languages, and you dont need anything. Its based on household. You put in your address and answer nine simple questions. How many people are in your household, do you rent, and your information. Your name, your age, your race, your gender. Everybody is 2,000 in funding for our child care, housing, food stamps, and medical care. All of the residents in the city and county of San Francisco need to be counted in census 2020. If youre not counted, then your community is underrepresented and will be underserved