arguments, the ways that the judge attacked the statements, you know, we spoke about it earlier this week. they put a statement out after mazar says you can no longer rely on the financial saying, see, this vindicates it. they say in here there's no material errors, so this investigation is moot. the judge wrote, to claim that mazar's red flag warning that the financials are unreliable renders the investigation moot is as audacious as it is preposterous. when you see those type of statements attacked the way they were, that's just by a judge making a ruling on it, what are you going to say in a civil deposition that's going to help you out? i can't see a way where the president doesn't assert his fifth amendment privileges as many times as he wants to. >> tom, clearly there's more peril here to donald trump than there was in an impeachment trial in the united states senate i would think. the other aspect he could claim