understand you have an obligation, a statutory obligation to share intelligence matters with the congress. now, we don't know with respect to the details of the ukraine story that broke in the papers tonight. if it's true, of course, it would be an extraordinary story and it would certainly be worthy of serious investigation by the congress if not others. point one. point two is i think joel brenner did a good job of laying out the situation. we have here a situation where the whistleblower has followed the statute and the regulations to a tee. he or she didn't leak this information. they didn't go inappropriately to the congress. therefore, he or she should be absolutely protected under the statute here. second, we had the appropriate official under the statute make a determination. that official, by the way-s a trump appointee, as the inspector general of the intelligence community, made a determination under the statute that it was an urgent and credible matter and should go to the congress through the dni.