Vegan gluten free rest rft. Cant we go to the food truck. Do you want to walk or take a taxi. There is an alert right here telling us there is heavy traffic in soma. Lets walk there and then take a taxi or muni back. That new website gives us a lot of options. It sure does and we can use it again next weekend when we go to see the giants. There is a new destination section on the website that shows us how to get to at t park. There is a section, and account alerts and information on parking and all kinds of stuff, it is so easy to use that even you can use it. That is smart. Are you giving me a compliment. I think that i am. Wow, thanks. Now you can buy dinner. Sfmta. Com. Access useful information, any test. Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, were going to get started please come in and take your square feet please come in and take your seats the meeting will come to order. This is the regular meeting of land use and transportation im supervisor cohens chair and to my right is supervisor wiener the vice chair and count ii is supervisor peskin our clerk is ms. Alicia and thank our friends at sfgovtv mark and manny for broadcasting this meeting announcements . Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the july 12th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. All right. Madam clerk item 2 well skip over item 2 and revisit it. Item 2 a resolution authorizing the to grant a amendment under the state of california Affordable Housing and system for a project on eddy call two and three and. 3 a resolution for the mta to grant an agreement and relayed documents under the ahbp as a joint applicant with mercy housing on fell street. Thank you very much so the Mayors Office of housing the controller and the budget analyst are still with us with potential changes to the particular items and asked we continue those two items to the next land use before i do that i open up for Public Comment to see if mop has come would like to comment on items 4 h woven woven or two a soft chime seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you colleagues may i have it motion to continue to the july 11th meeting. So moved. Without objection that motion carries unanimously thank you all right. Can you call items 4 and 5 together. Ordinances accepting the irrevocable acquisition facilities associated with the south bay and trust particle 14 p26 dedicating them for public use and naming the park Mariposa Park bearing from the dpw welcome the floor is yours. Good afternoon barbara public works two items the first is the acceptance of Public Infrastructure with block 13 in the bay ill show you where that is computed streets in the facility of portion of channel street and el dorado north and El Dorado South the project is krushg of infrastructure on the portion of the streets noted the developer requested the terjsz of deemed the public improvements with the approved plans and specifications the director of public works has said the project is ready along with that before i conclude we have a similar action which is the acceptance of Mariposa Park and that park is noted here in green whoops cant see it pardon me this is p6 those public improvements are constructed in accordance with the Mission Bay Park specifications and the director of public works issued a nose the project is complete in both cases the city planning has determined the acceptance of park as well as the public improvements as noted in the streets surrounding the area are consistent with the citys general plan and 8 policies with the planning codes section and not to trigger any faster ceqa the office of the community has said the improvements are consistent with the development and plan documents we request the land use productive and recommend acceptance of public improvements ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Seeing no questions i think well go to Public Comment. Opening up for Public Comment on those two items items four and five okay Public Comment is closed. Seeing none here colleagues, any questions that you may have dpw or we also have staff from supervisor kims office present as well as ocii to answer your questions all right. Well colleagues a motion store those two items . Supervisor wiener can i have a motion without objection that a madam chair theyre out of committee reports. Thats correct without recommendation. Without recommendations referred out to the june 28th referred without recommendation. Thank you without objection that motion carries consummating. Item 6 the term sheet with brood with the hotel featuring the zoning and public parks and open space and the ancillary on seawall lots thank you court staff with us this afternoon to present. My name is ricky the Development Project sponsor are the planning and development of the port im excited to be here today to report on that item im going to provide backward and then touch base on the highlights of the term sheet and then recommend i mean ask youre positive recommendation of this to the full board. Do i have control over these slides. Yes. You should have control are you having trouble. Oh, there we go. Yeah. I have it. Thank you. The a former tenants in Good Standing the port entered into a leased with them in 1999 to use a portion of pier 27 and 29 for the theatre proclamations as you can see on the slide thats the old location and the Current Location is seawall 3, 24 ill get to tie in a minute in 2001 the lease was maturing terminated to accommodate the americas cup and the construction of james r. Herman terminal on pier 27 part of that combination was the theatreal satisfaction of the preconditions theyll negotiate a lease for the seawall 24 one of the conditions is coming up with a project design it is impartial with the location of that site that is the northeast waterfront historic conservation district the site of this subject matter is across from pier 9 with 4 lots seawall 3, 24 and 23 and 3 stopped between those two passages the need to for budget design that is comparable with the site location theoretical is a project that requires the entire sites of seawall lots and adjacent lots and last year in may the Port Commission directed the staff to come brother the board to seek a waiver from the competitive boyd process we went through the committee and the board provided the waiver in may of last year to allow the port to enter into an n n a the resolution that is adapted last year was that the port work with the port and developer work with the community conducted extensive outreach for community button input to make sure the design a k345sh8 with the development and one of the reasons for gratifying granting that waiver was the uniqueness of the theory california being an icon and 98 of the admin code to retain the icon in the city as indicated a a hotel that we include one and to 2 Homicide Hotel as space for the theatre for Public Open Space total Development Cost for this project is currently at one and of 24 million of which the 4 million will be provided in quantity and the balance in equity no port funding for this development very quickly the highlights of the term sheet were proposing a 50year term initial term with an option for a 15 year term the reason for 34 year to attract buyer equity and allow for the amortization of the development with an lda a Lease Development disposition agreement that covers the period of construction and they will be paying the port 50,000 a year during that period and they will have 36 months to complete those requirements on that lda the rent structure calls for a base rent a percentage rent participation rent the base rent is a minimum base rent theyll unpaid pay the port regardless of how it is constructed ill go into a little bit more details the percentage rent will allow the city and port to participation in the upside and special rents for the finance of the project for the city and port to get a portion of those proceeds during the entitlement process before we turn the proprietary no cost to the port because it will be paying the transaction costs the pier occurs involving the time and the e n a as part of this that is in the term sheet at benchmarking to move forward and one of those exclude that he fulfill the construction on time and the port is not paying the rents but will complete the construction on time to need to make liquid dictated the lease will be coming back to you for approval before it comes to you as i indicated just to show the number as part of direction that the board of supervisors gave us we need to get an appraiser and hire a consultant to make sure the port is getting a valid lease indicated on that slide the current represent or the proeblgd rent the port will be receiving is not lease or not developed and used for packing the bottom of the charged is indicating the rent during construction which is during construction the rent will be 80 or 90,000 and during the operation the needle is 9 hundred and 15 thousand the percentage rent is way higher in the package on this item to wrap up im going to quickly highlight the project benefits within this is a wonderful opportunity to develop this site which will be architecturally fitting to the district a Public Open Space that is privately financed as well as the Construction Costs and the maintenance of that park appropriated during the term of the lease it is currently one and 50 jobs will be provided up to three hundred and parttime jobs and that revenue it beneficial to the park the estimate is 7. 8 million that will be generated for the city for the one time impact fees and an afternoon of 9 million every year of the project as a minimum and of course the project will be meeting many communities ufos and benefits and, of course, with the theory design in the city this is just a shot of their of one the events back on pier 27 that concludes that presentation we do recommend that you provide a positive recommendation to the for the full board to endorse this term sheet thank you. Thank you very much for your presentation colleagues, any questions based on that presentation that was given art seeing none, thank you why not go to Public Comment at this time ive got several cards that are in front of me just why dont you guys line up first calling names all right. Supervisors mike San Francisco trades council ill i couldnt the substantial little contingent in the Northeast Corner of room to show their support for this project one of the first projects that i considered had i took this position some years ago now back in 1995, of course, 2005 another project permitted for the same location in embarcadero and another hotel we didnt end up support that it didnt garden support and that project went down but a real need to have the functions that absolutely need to be severed so for the port and city like the recession of the seawall good to see a viable project to come back for approval and we support that project i want to enforcement the proponents for their outreach to the community theyve reached out to us early and often and done so to organization that have actionly been a. D. Series and ask you to approve the project thank you very much mike next it bill. Good afternoon, supervisors im bill ive president of the Golden Gateway and the active president of the Barbary Coast our members live smack date of birth next to the project and the folks have done a great job of an outreach one of the plans the designs are happy with the project will stay with the existing height limit of this location we hope very much youll endorse the term sheet and wish Great Success to the development of a new magnet a new attraction for the waterfront i have letters from the Vice President of Barbary CoastNeighborhood Organization for each of you id like to leave. Thank you. Next speaker a christen. Hi thank you for your time and in the in the interest of time ill consolidate what i wrote by my name is christina resident in San Francisco over 24 years my privilege to build my craft as a singing all over the with one of the greatest actors like jones bye hes and others today, i represent the many proefrmdz as well as 21 countries around the world for the contracts here in San Francisco angle appetite for new cultural and exactly the modern form of theatre for the people in the audience they release theyre not just observing a show but part of it being part of the Italian Community even broadway and embarcadero is perfect for our hotel and athlete the artistic nature it very important tourists and locals expect San Francisco to have permanent venues 2 fit our unique population and style i absolutely love San Francisco and all the windfall performing opportunity but it is allows me to grow as an artist an good enough felt artists ill asking the land use and transportation to recommend you come back to the wonderful waterfront we really have to have this as a permanent place for people from all over the world to come together in peace and celebrate life and love and choose and diner thank you very much. Fantastic thank you calling names . Thank you, supervisors my name is lee if i may have the opportunity to digress i want to thank supervisor peskin and the board of supervisors for their letter of june 8th expressing their condolences attire the regene it was seller precedent by your payment. Thank you for that as far as what im here representing we support the endorsement of the term sheet and southeast 23 and 24 theyve been Good Neighbors for many years on the waterside and have the opportunity to develop on the west side and look forward to their commitment to continue to be Good Neighbors as we know theyve been in the many years 2, 3, 4 the past we ask for your enforcement. Thank you. Im an actor and singer and producer and dancer and choreograph for wonderful arts katie perry and madonna and Michael Jackson and was in films in honors ive performed all over the world my experience has been by far the highlights my first contract was here in San Francisco and it blew my mind really difficult to describe the experience 7 of being intimidate with the audience and hear people breathing and talking about while im spinning around it is a unique variety american variety tradition and i know of no others american venue that applies the diversity of artists gay and straight and american chinese and young and old and currently performing and our casts ranges in age from 13 to 83 with Tony Awardwinning spitfire lillian leading the charge in this show i perform a physical trap hes there was what woman is approached me in tears and seen her mother crippled and couldnt be valued at a certain age. Thanked me i couldnt do when i do unless you have the philosophy that celebs women of age thats one of the many stories please help us come back thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. Is deborah. Ive been a designer and theatre artists for 40 years or probably longer since 71 been part of counter cult and watched the city change not the counter kublt were in a position to lead and everybody is looking to San Francisco and seeing what is happening here it is on the top leading id like to suggest and hopefully continue to lead no to our support and belief of the arts and bring love and talents and fun and Community Back to the city and keep it in the city and thank you for listening thank you. The next card a calling names anyone else that want to speak please come on up thats fine. Hi, im karen ive been a sfolth since 1998 i joined the circus a guest art and purchasing agent and enjoyed many performs in San Francisco and seattle i live and breath the artists i was in in front of and bind the scenes and felt the transportation that the actors have on audience as well as the unbeknownst bounded enjoy and cultivate of children leon skills and being part of this im irregularly the land use and transportation to support the sheet and recommend we come back to San Francisco as soon as possible with the tents on the waft where it was part of multi use integrated hotel and project thank you for your time. Thank you. Good afternoon. Community members im cynthia a research in fact, for the Hotel Workers union and here to support this we support 24 as it went through the process and happy to support it we represent 12 thought hospitality workers in San Mateo Community and speaking on behalf of other folks as a Union Representative of hospitality 72 hours our concern when new jobs are created their jobs that lit out the working conditions for the hard working meaning that work in the hotels Hotel Developers have supported the good jobs by presenter no differences by the employers to form a union overseeing agreement are a double win they insure the jobs are good quality and guarantee theyre free from costing labor substitutes theyve worked with our units and as such h such are setting an example were pleased to support this and feel free to contact me if you have questions. Anyone else that wants to speak on item 6 all right. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you colleagues, any last discussions supervisor peskin. Thank you, madam chair and to the members of the public that testified today. I think the gentleman point his finger on it years ago the previous proposal was remarkable controversial i was one of the people that believed we could have a project that worked at this site and it is delightful two years later weve come up with a solution it is with myly supported by the neighborhood, by local 2 and by the Building Trades i want to speak to the financial terms i believe that the port of San Francisco and its staff negotiated a complete financial passage in terms of what are before us obviously well see have a final agreement that will trail 24 and we will obviously look at being with a fine toothed comp this person an item that deserves our support and should send to the full board with a positive recommendation thank you. Any other remarks all right. Well see is there a motion . Thats a a motion. Thats a motion with a positive recommendation . Yes. Indeed. A motion with a positive recommendation to move forward without objection the motion passes thank you. clapping. all right. Can we go back to item neuron ordering the summary strait as part of pylon approving the troofrm to the rec and park adopting the appropriate understanding. Thank you very much i want to recognize cassandra. Thank you thank you good afternoon, supervisors chair cohen with the rec and Park Department i wanted to give give you a little bit of background on this item the protective before you will vacant approximately 200 and 6 square feet of pylon park which is under the rec and park is a clean legislation this is maintained by the rec and park and stwrartd as part of pioneer park many transfers this to the rec and park the purpose of street vacation to allow for the installation of a small reechlt kiosk the area is subject of many public hearings and was supportedcy the rec and park additional it has been discussed numerous times at the coit tower working group. Flovbt the place to be vacated this is a community chosen location it is visible to the visitors of coit tower. The proposed kiosk will be 9 by 12 feet e feet and over reeshlts this concludes my brief presentation. In the absence of our chair first of all, i want to acknowledge the work that rec and park has done over many years not unlike the last item that was off at the a rocky start but now a place into twitter are coit tower that has treated that it dpw era murals appropriately in the back of the passage of prop b and i think that mr. Grim and his staff are doing a remarkable job and acknowledge that rec and park has worked with the surrounding community to find a better sites weve read in 2, 3, 4 mornings examiner not without controversy that remains having said that, i think that fundamentally in order to achieve the number of different goals were trying to achieve one of the preaccepts is this kiosk is fundamentally temporary and removable should this that experiment not work and banned in the future and rec and park or the termination of lease in the future and to that end i wanted to offer some language and i want to thank deputy City Attorney lee for crafting it ive given to any fell Committee Members that provides a mechanism for the rightofway, if you will, to revoter to the department of public works through the i am position of an easement should in the future that kiosk be abandon or fall into disuse or terminate their Lease Agreement so i would subject to Public Comment madam chair and supervisor wiener like to add that amendment and with rec and park staff ms. Casco and with that, im to hear in the public. Great before we do that supervisor wiener has a few comments. Thank you very much im glad to see that accounting just a quick thing what the the rational for converting this land back to dwp and other imagery paper streets. By the way, as my neighbor knows the Telegraph Hill is actually full of a number of unimproved rightofways along filbert and greenwich and the notation is really to underscore the temporary nature and the suspenders god forbid rec and park abandon this provides another means by which the public works has the ability to remove the kiosk in the future should it fall into disrepair or use. I dont have a problem with the amendment im curious i have an example in dolores park where 19th street goes through that ive been i dont know if it is of a street weve been trying to get it vacated it seems to me it should be city policy when we have paper streets make sense to vacate the streets and transfer the property formally to rec and park if supervisor peskin wants to proceed im fine but 23 this is the general approach. Not to sound legalistic but the fee title will transfer from dpw to rec and park and under our chapter will remain are rec and park but dpw will reserve an amendment. Thank you very much lets go ahead and go to Public Comment. Folks anyone interested in commenting on item number one thank you. Well. Pardon my hat when i told my dermatologist she would you were loving people im a member of pioneer park project i was contributing a significant amount of money to the park and glad the name is coming back into Public Awareness we do appreciate the improvements that is come from the coit tower and were encouraging this to be approved mostly in the name of helping coit tower and the procession to continue their business i agree that the concession stand the refreshments stand is temporary i dont see with any problem with the removal and thank the gentleman for the long term that stewardship and many of the other neighbors in the area as well as their support for the restoration of the murals and the refurbishment of that iconic city landmark. Anyone else that want to speak all right. Public comment is closed. Supervisor peskin another motion. Madam chair move the amendment that ive distributed and given a copy have to the clerk set forth on pam number 4 at the bottom subsection two subsection d into page 5 and then with that amendment and send this to the full board with recommendation. Well accept the amendments and move 24 item as amended to the full board supervisors you lived with recommendation and without objection. Without objection. Okay madam clerk i think well go back to item 7 thats correct. Yeah. Item 7 a hearing on the federal management the Flood Insurance and to solicit input. I introduced this is as the City Administrators Office for the city and public have a coordinated opportunity to provide feedback on the fema flood map every 5 years fema reviews the flood map with local governments and provides accurate an accurate understanding of the Sea Level Rise change to the flood plan insurance requirement as you can imagine this is incredibly important and fema has presented to the port and airport including the respective fell tenants and to inform as you as we gather input from stakeholders at this time ill call up jennifer and then after jennifer well hear a presentation from fema officials that are here ms. Johnson. Good afternoon, supervisors again Jennifer Deputy city administrators as you may know the city has been a participant since 2010 it was created 50 years ago for the purpose of reducing the reflex posed by floods dhout the United States but having Flood Insurance for Property Owners and businesses and participating jurisdictions in exchange of flood plan management as part of n f i p has a flood map for participating jurisdictions which show the special flood hazard areas fema is currently publishing a firm for San Francisco that includes the appeals process were in the admitted of that appeals process now the preliminary firm has zones that includes the airport and mission bay and bayview Hunters Point and the candle stick point and Treasure Island once a preliminary firm final list this the city has the special flood areas to implement the provisions of the city flood plan in the administrative code as the administrative code the city mists has all appeals on behalf of the city and county of San Francisco our appeal deadline a august 1st to that end weve range for foumd to present a finalization and the impacts of the impacts present on behalf of fema is curtis from fema and others we have representatives from the airport and the port should you have any questions. Fantastic thank you to welcome the fema representatives the floor is yours. Im edward an engineer from the fuchld office here from oakland our study let me get our slides on the there we go. As mentioned were providing new information and in the form of it Flood Insurance rate maps innovation with the Flood Program ill be briefly spanking about the mapping process it is part of an overall coastal mapping underway but for the Oakland Pacific cost and all 9 counties separates projects providing flood hazard information to the bay and, of course, for San Francisco the two projects come together we issued a combined set of Flood Insurance rate map paeblz for the entire open coast of San Francisco city and county including Treasure Island and the airport as well as those panels are issued as preliminary panels november 12th of 2015 we started a 90 day Public Appeal period ended on august 1st, the standard period for all fema promotions that result in a regulatory Flood Insurance rate maps during the 90 day appeal period staff from the community, from and from the general Public Comment can submit comments and appeals to fema an appeal a technical challenges to the elevation of the flood that will be expected during a one hundred year flood once that closes well review and resolve any comments and make changes to the preliminary 3457z before their final we determine what is effective for the Flood Insurance map and based on the current schedule anticipate that by november of this year we would complete that process of resolving the comments and appeals and issue a letter of financial determination to the city and county of San Francisco indicating 6 months the maps will be final and effective if you stick to that schedule that results if effective maps may of 2017 that schedule could slip depending upon the time of the appeals we receive ill stop and my colleague eddy will provide Additional Information if you have any questions, well be happy to answer them. Thank you. Good afternoon, supervisors my name is eddy and i represent the flood plan managed branch in oakland and id like to address in the next few minutes is how the new maps modesty impact 9 constituents and the city and county of San Francisco i think that is important to know that those are preliminary maps at that stage the information that well present is more Information Purposes only and it ranges the full gamete of possibilities so keep in mind with that said id like to address two topics the first is how the new maps my impact the development and the new construction the regulations for the national Flood Insurance program with respect to building and development are embedded in the code of federal regulations 44 cf r and 63 want 3 and the California Building code their regulatory those new maps will have some impact on new development and improvements done to those believes that are impacted and that impact can range from minimal for those buildings that are in low risk areas like what we call flood zone x a low to moderate range of flooding all the way to prohibition on new construction in areas where there is the highest risk of flooding like the 3 e zones for locations where new construction is proposed for buildings entirely over water so the impact can range from minimal to relatively severe with respect to Flood Insurance and the financial impacts the maps are important because any buildings that has a federally backed loan in a flood zone a or v the special flood highrisk areas are required under the Flood Disaster flood act of 1973 and the national Flood Insurance act of 1994 to have Flood Insurance so any of those buildings that will be proposed to be in a any type of a or b having a federally backed loans can have a mandatory flood it is optional in the low to moderate zones and available at a lower cost the range or the cost of Flood Insurance really various substantial depend on the level of risk so in 0 minimal risk areas where there is a low to moderate risk of zoning for commercial buildings and maximum coverage the Flood Insurance what range around 3,500 and that can circulate to 24,000 a year for those buildings in the most hazardous flood zones like the e e and for residential Property Owners that range can go from low to 425 to a high of lets say 5,700 the Flood Insurance a based on the individual characters of each and every building we encourage the folks to talk to their Insurance Agents about the cost codify Flood Insurance for theyre specific building and fema encourages autumn Property Owners regardless of their flood zone to talk with their agent about flooding 25 percent of the claims are out of the low to moderate flood zones and certainly x zones in the city of San Francisco where we would have situations that possibly the local stormwater and sewage system is over taken by the flooding events and if this event that flooding events meets the conditions of Flood Insurance those Property Owners will be deflected those opportunities available for Property Owners and the regulations and the Flood Insurance are really tint for preservation of life and property and to vote to limit Economic Impacts of flooding events that might occur within local communities as of april 30th 2016 two one hundred and 6 of flood shiners policies within the city and county of San Francisco a thank you commissioner peskin your name on the list no thank you for your Important Information it is predicament to go to Public Comment at this time anyone wishes to comment this is item 7. Landlord tenant seeing none, Public Comment is closed. So colleagues thank you for hearing this item i make a motion to continue this through the chair. Can you call items 8 and 9. Items 8 and 9 resolutions urging the legislative for the housing approvals for the trail bill in recognition of San Francisco housing crisis existing obstacles and planning and electricians to the regional statewide housing. So those items we are sent to committee from the full board just a minute supervisor peskin and supervisor wiener will have im sure a few remarks i see commissioner stephensons name and like to recognize him. Thank you, madam chair as we are all aware in the budget process before the california states protective the governor has trailing legislation that would profoundly impact San Francisco and other municipalities that currently have local planning laws that actually build much more on sight Affordable Housing than as provided for in the governors by right legislation we attempted to take a position irregularly our stat logic delegation to either amend 9 governors trail bill proposal or if unsuccessful oppose it and the large project i originally introduced has evolved no longer looking for performance based exceptions for the city and county of San Francisco but more like mayor ed lee wrote to the governor on june 13th were suggesting a number of very specific proposals i in an attempt to compromises or bring together the two different resolution one support by myself supervisor mar supervisor yee and supervisor avalos and supervisor campos together with item 9 sponsored by supervisor wiener have disdonated to both of bring those two items together specifically like the governors bill to be amended with the support of our San Francisco protective delegation he particularly wanted to acknowledge senator leno that met wards to this matter but specifically like a prohibition on the demolition of existing hours a minimum bottom line for as of right approval for the inclusionary housing standards and a premium increase as determined by the Technical Analysis for the promotions begins construction between 12 months of their approval use it or lose it rather than a speech active entitlement and that major developments for local consideration approval as 3r0i9dz by local laws and with that, i will relinquish the floor. Thank you, supervisor wiener. Thank you, madam chair claernd those two items together i look forward to the discussion today so i think when the governor first introduced the tailor bill to try to expedite the creation of housing in california regardless of where one is on the specifics of the bill i think we all agree the bill needs to be amend around the demolition issues so it didnt make it easier to demolish housing like the Design Review and so forth c but i think awhile some people immediately opposed the bill my reaction and the reaction of a lot of people was lets talk since it is opposing lets talk about how we can make that bill better and acknowledge were in a deep, deep housing crisis not just in San Francisco not just in the bayview but various parts of california this housing crisis is streamlining the fabric of our state and in terms of who protecting, middleincome or workingclass families are going to be able to continue to live here to not just those of us who are lucky enough to have housing and to be able to stay in the hours that is critically important but to make sure that the next generations is going to be able to come here and raise families here to make sure those of us who live here already if we have to move are actually going to be able to move it is a crisis of deep, deep deep significance to the future of this state and whatever you view in the governors bill i think that i personally and a lot of us commend did governor for at least putting forward an idea to say the current states of affairs is not doing well in california with housing and that frankly are not doing good enough in San Francisco on housing as evidence by the rents of 3,500 a month so after the bill was introduced supervisor peskin introduced his resolution and while i appreciate any efforts to raise those issues at the board of supervisors to have a discussion i have serious concerns with the resolution the initial resolution that supervisor peskin offend would put us in records an option to the tailor bill and in my view didnt acknowledge where we are in terms of our housing crisis how we got here we need to do things definitely with housing thats the bottom line with me to do things definitely with housing the way for the last probably 50 years is not good enough and caused the problems we have today had you look at where we are in the bay area several million more people than 1980 and 200 thousand important than 1980 an comploitd population and when you have that kind of an exploding population youll have an unbelievable expensive housing costs i have introduced an alternative resolution one that acknowledges the housing crisis that states the needs for more housing that includes subtracted bloefrt but knows that is not enough and emptied belowmarketrate housing is by itself not going to solve the crisis as critical as it is and seller certainly not solve the crisis for the marching by the resolution states the need to improve the process and also states the need to focus the governors bill to narrow it to the focus of the heart of problem which is that when we have in various parts of california a zoning that allows for a certain number one number of units and density and height there are times when a process will force that number or that size down so have a parcel it is zoned put 50 units on it and due to the local pressure end up with 18 units Something Like that thats the heart of problem that rezoning but the reality of the process is that you ended up with far too fewer units that impacts negatively both marketrate housing and subsidized Affordable Housing did resolution on the alternative to insure we have changes to the tailor bill not making easier the demolition of housing were take into account the environmental and labor needs were allowing for good Design Reviews is where we have welldesigned buildings and that we dont have some of the really parolee designed buildings weve another times seen and making sure we have good streetscaping improvements and all the things we know go into good Transit Oriented Development i thank supervisor peskin for coming up with amendments and very much appreciate the merging or compromising the two resolutions, however, the amendments ive seen i dont think do that the legislation the amendments offend by supervisor peskin continue not to say anything about the need for more housing or the impede to new housing in San Francisco those resolutions still puts us on record in opposition the resolution does as supervisor peskin mentioned specifically states that the current approval process still remains intact and says at the bottom of page 2 quote the improvements continue to allow for public review and local consideration as it is provided by local law nrmdz didnt change anything the amendments that supervisor peskin is distributed they dont say anything about what i think is the heart of resolution i authored that is requiring compliance with locally adapted zoning in terms of the number of units and the height and putting a stop to the arbitrary reduction so i appreciate it but dont get to the heart of matter in my view not a true compromise i have specific questions about the amendments i dont know if chair cohen you want me to hold off but again, thank you to everyone. Go ahead and go to Public Comment and then back to you supervisor wiener. Thank you, gentlemen for your opening remarks id like to open up Public Comment at this time calling names are you here oh, good to see you dennis calling names . Oh, excuse me youre right. Okay connie the brother has graciously offered me the seat my name is connie im one of the Vice President of the San FranciscoLabor Council and today, i speak on behalf of the Labor Council we are the first thing i want to say all of what supervisor wiener said in regards to the housing crisis is there throughout the city it is a crisis and the bay area a crisis and throughout the city a crisis nobody believes that more than working people in San Francisco that continuing see people shoved out the Labor Council loves the agreements are standing in favor of supervisor peskin resolution and we urge the board of supervisors to a declaration 4 points that is that the governors proposed by right Development Proposal is a serious threat to all citys ability to protect the Affordable Housing imply collar jobs and Small Businesses and the environment number 2 the publics right to review and to participate in the Development Process and including the Planning Commission discretionary review is essential 3 the by right directly strengthens speculators to rush through the approval and number 4 the by right policy weakens the city for greater housing affordable and protect the neighborhoods and id like to present this to someone on the committee it is signed by ace action Chinatown CommunityDevelopment Center and human rights of San Francisco, jobs for judges and Economic Development and the San Francisco building and construction would you be able the south of Market Action network thank you. Next speaker good afternoon, supervisors that was a wonderfully diverse support and pride parade and today, i was cheered to read of the brave 4 hundred brave anti fascists that scatters the catalytic converter group trying to enter the state capital and this morning i was really pleased to see the vote of texas antiabortion law urban constitutional and by right will not speed production of Affordable Housing it was a good weekend for the people but today, i ask that each of you support the advancement by supervisor peskin and his 5 colleagues urging the protective delegation to amend or oppose the boy right tailor bill the resolution seeks to sustain your control over our land use prohibits the occasions of rentcontrolled unit and protects the right to hire the inclusionary housing what is by right or for whom is by right for Real Estate Developers and speculators under the cover it will allow the developers to build anywhere and occasion the rentcontrolled unit and thats for whom by right takes for whom does it take it takes local allowing controls wow. And san franciscans that overrides the local jurisdictions and takes authority and taking away from the working class like the Trans Pacific for the National Sort of try over the local jurisdiction by right takes a license to take it is a taking please oppose that and support the supervisor peskin resolution thank you. Next speaker. Good afternoon, supervisors testing d 4 action the govern has good intentions but there was no Community Process he jumped into action that was without checking in with the rest of the state weve spent many years in deliberate efforts to guide future growth and to get more Affordable Housing in San FranciscoCommunity Plans like chinatown, van ness, eastern neighborhoods, have all been dont think Community Review and input what needs to go on in the rest of the state not necessarily hike here we dont want to compromise support for existing hours support for our Small Businesses, retention of pdr jobs and so many other things we have to remember that the uc berkley report shows well not be able to get the rents down developers are interested in profit not building for the lowest common denominator we need to get our representatives in sacramento and their allies to amend or to oppose the trailing legislation most parts of california can benefit but not San Francisco wench got a good process and a lot of housing not built and not being built because of lack of entitlements those are 14 to 20 thousand unions units that are entitled not the Community Process is holding up housing it Something Else thank you. Good afternoon with charm im here to support supervisor peskin measure for exempting San Francisco and i agree with supervisor wiener it is we have housing crisis but i also want to bring up not only the housing crisis but displacement crisis and jurisdiction crisis and our communities 2, 3, 4 in San Francisco that are standing to lose if theyre not have Community Input and just another bone to the developers whatever they want without oversight or Environmental Impact and any input if the communities as an example i want to brought to your attention supervisor wiener that it was only maybe a year ago or maybe over a year ago thanks to your leadership the Corona Heights was not having a moratorium on super sized homes because want Community Input and Community Opposition that you took the leadership and brought that advantage that benefits to that community so it is very important for to the community to have their input and have a dialogue with developers dialogue with the city and the Planning Department also i want to brought to your attention it was only a few months ago we a brouhaha with the dpw and people in San Francisco haves spoken as a result, the Planning Department since that legislation the property legislation the whole bunch of amendments that are going for your vote that are going to make that a completely Different Things we started off with those are examples that demonstrate the city of San Francisco is not the kind of place that fast tracking will work people will be opposing it and want to urge you to listen to your constituents and pass supervisor peskin legislation to the city of San Francisco will be exempt thank you. Good afternoon im sorry anastasia from district 8 were here once again to consider the facts that one obtaining National Supervisor has denied all the supervisors an up and down vote regarding supervisor peskin proposed resolution to declare our city exempt from governor jerry brown by right legislation through consideration this by right tailor bill that didnt make it to become law and the attachment to the june 20152016 is seriously flawed and not the answer to what we need in San Francisco housing policy it denies the residents the right to participate in shaping housing policy or have any input on community proposed by developers the convinces of the fast tracking without in sight and lacking Community Process involving all stakeholders will alternate the city of San Francisco our historical heritage and would be disastrous please vote on supervisor peskins xhpgs xpgs exception. Hello boards my name is a 0 ross im a Community Activist with ace and also a Community Person that lives in the bayview im here because you know, i have a piece of paper that i can read off of i want to turn that over i want to speak from eye heart and sit down are supervisor peskin and his colleagues have a good issue will what needs to be done and supervisor wiener has an issue too what needs to be done we need to come together and speed up think outside the box and talking about what we can do jointly to make those things happen for our communities because it is; right were at a point that housing is mrimd limited for protecting and middleincome and more housing for those that can afford 35 hundreds a month for a studio and beyond lets sit down and workout we need to step outside of box and what had we need to do for firefighters and teachers we need to impact our community and the only way to do that sit down and Work Together per we have to come up with legislation to resolve those from outside the Governors Office we need to have done here in San Francisco were our own leaders wiener knows and supervisor peskin knows the other board of supervisors know what we need to have done we need to sit down and Work Together to oversee and implement and make things happen because the only way to get things done is working together were all know that protecting and middleincome and workers in San Francisco are having a hard time to live here the only way to Work Together i mean, we cant have those separate bills coming were doing this and that ross. Thank you thank you. All right. Next speaker. Thank you. Hold on turn the my case. Hi, im a bayview resident and a residents youve seen my face ive asked the question by rights for who this takes away this takes one way or the other away the community face we hold the Developers Accountable we see the inclusionary rights and the developers are more likely to provide affordable units based on the financial feasibility of their project but not based on the real needs of affordable units is it so really already shown that developers provide more Affordable Housing they will only when forced this bill didnt give that opportunity unfortunately, were in a site for our residents to remain in the city and we cant afford weve not printed what has been created and basically what has been created is the pay to play ment outlet if you cant it makes me sad as a san franciscan youve not seen me ive given up and disgusted and frustrated with the democratic process country unfortunately, the people are at the top of being more prioritized then the people at the bottom i believe in my heart if something didnt happen definitely with our government represents for them to start representing the people versus the privileged class of people that are the minority in this country theres going to be a demonstration of resistance im just being honest i pray every night for peace but the only im ready to unfortunately, there are people that are good afternoon, supervisors tim colen, San FranciscoHousing Action coalition. First want to express i guess my amazement that people are spending in 70 santa monica that hey we dont need the by right were doing such a darn good job in San Francisco that contradicts every position as well as i recall in the stayed rational for prop c the trusting and prop k and the Affordable Housing and Mission Moratorium prop a the bond and the most recent prop c it is certainly not what is discussed in the Mission District we have a problem with Affordable Housing the idea of exempting ourselves with changes not responsive to what were facing i know that is important to recall what governor jerry brown has said number one localities the cities in california you dont get it not adding the crisis the city and number 2 not possible under any raechlgs of realistic economic somewhere we can subsidies our problem without disastrously flowering the how many amount of housing in that sense supervisor wiener has it right. I would hope that we could somehow reach consensus we will somehow keep all the local controls and achieve a different result isnt that a request for the status quo lets defend the status quo the governors is proposing Something Different i think he is the right of it we had better start producing much more housing if we expect to have an impact on affordability the protective Analysis Office a Bipartisan Group and the reports tare putting out should be read at every level of government i think we support the by right proposal as amendment and a lot of very good amendments by serious housing and anti poverty groups that makes a lot of sense and easy to support but requires a dramatic turn thank you. Good afternoon, supervisors jim Lazarus Chamber of commerce as ive said before this problem in San Francisco is back decades we down zoned our neighborhood and make it difficult to build within the zoning let alone we cant pass out felt board legislation to allow a slight as as trade off for more forecast and point to our neighbors rightfully around the bayview and the state theyre part of problem when the Affordable Housing on an Old Industrial sites next to go 101 the neighbors 4 problems and dont see the appropriate paths to create Affordable Housing throughout the 9 bay area counties every permit effecting housing is subject to an appeal which is not the case i building in any others city and county in the state of california were not part of solution we have to change maybe we have the guts to look at our Zoning District are lose and look at it what is appealable or not how do we fast track in every neighborhood in San Francisco the governors proposal is a small step to deal with it on a statewide basis appreciate supervisor peskin amendment and hopefully between now and the Board Meeting supervisor wiener and supervisor peskin can come together on one piece of legislation that contains the immediate amendments to work in every city and county in the city and county of San Francisco. Next speaker, please. Come on down. Thank you i dont need to do any of this stuff the housing crisis was very bad when then mayor newsom did the sro project correct one do one storage lockers come on you guys can put those in every says that the city owns those are very, very Beautiful Homes i mean id like to live in a storage locker like this if you cant get it together to use storage lockers to solve the homeless crisis then you need to look at it again those are very inexpensive theyre Beautiful Homes you can make into a in his place was all the water on one side and make sort of like a submarine in world war ii ill tell you what if i had a beautiful storage locker with youll see metal fixing i can put it anywhere those thanks can, stacked skyhigh in you canned figure out ive designed a storage locker designed they use for offices all over the world all you have to do is put me in charge of the housing crisis ill form and committee and be the housing guy that does storage lockers im not kidnapping ill show you how to do it is easy and by the way, have a good day i like commissioner peskin a lot and supervisor wiener and the board of supervisors have a great San Francisco day love you very much. Thank you next speaker. Good afternoon. Im the policy manager forever the Mission Development agency we are pro now the housing vendors and getting seven hundred and 50 affordable units in the pipeline over the last 15 years one and 50 or so we urge the stronger support of supervisor cohens to oppose or amendment it weve seen displacement and lost one third since the latinos and the displacement is rampant not only for the population but the businesses thats were asking for basically to be able to maintain the public review of any projects for example, a project the monster in the mission the hugest in the history of San Francisco and that note to have any type of public review at 15 and the bart station is a serious serious problem for our neighborhood not only our the supervisors but how to produce its and transform the Advocacy Agency said if you build Affordable Housing in the Transit Centers youll twice as likely for the use of Public Transportation and also luxury housing theyll emit requester emissions and good ridership this proposal proposes to do allows Affordable Housing 10 percent near transit as opposed to outside of Transit Centers we also want to make sure weve developed over 15 hundred lecturer units more than that 46 of the 101 bay area cities in the Housing Element and we could use more review of that during that time you know weve seen the displacement of population and without public review further continue to have savior income inequality we urge you to support this legislation thank you. Next speaker, please. Supervisors michael of San FranciscoBuilding Trades council that will be loflg if the developers can be counted on to do everything economically feasible for the communities in which they build unfortunately, that is not how the system works as long as it works in a different way the planning the entitlement process is bad and im not a fan of being up to 2 in the morning retaining the function and the california trades council has counted out in opposition to the governors always of right legislation and asked to join weve done see the statement you had distributed by sister ford earlier is one that was approved yesterday we would hope that the governors legislation could be amended to appoint it is useful and acceptable we are not going to count on that as long as we cant were in opposition thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, supervisors peter cohen, San Francisco council of Community Housing organizations. I actually pleased to follow mike from the Building Trades weve not agreed in recent months, but this one we do it is broad opposition to the governors right bill it was pulled from the state budget two weeks ago not only the Building Trades by the cal federation and teachers and Hotel Workers and the local council on the environmental does the Natural Sources and the Planning League and the sierra club are opposed to this bill and statewide 60 organizations from los angeles to the bay area all signed on a letter housing grownups and others sent to the dpofrn two weeks ago expressing the concern of this particularly in gentrifying communities it is loud and clear there are serious flaws the other interesting thing that boards amazing in april of thorough passed a resolution oppose an identical bill by an unknown Assembly Plan to all of you but gotten the governor the tune is changing is it so the same thing so it basically says it overrides local consideration over Land Use Decision makers we ought to be concerned and a lot of amendments substantive and good things in the mayors and supervisor wiener the la county and lots of cool ideas where you start from we support this and therefore having number league of women around the edges we oppose this this is rally california and negative exclamations we ask you to support it thank you. Good afternoon, supervisors Katherine Howard district 4 resident i guess you can say aim angle open space and parks person i sport supervisor wiener we need the public input that makes the process better if you eliminate eirs and others discretionary reviews it takes away our how about wind impacts without consideration of this and turn the surrounding area into a wind tounld tunnel shadows boxing is an impact of the community and what about the space are not residents of New Buildings ive seen plans that make a mockery of open space with the interior courtyard not a space people want to spend time in the public process gives the project for a community at large but for the new residents about the projects please support supervisor peskins resolution thank you. Calvin san franciscans for Community Planning speaking in support of supervisor cowen supervisor peskin it is sponsor for us to keep fundamental facts before us San Francisco produces more than 100 percent of its bay area Regional Housing needs from marketrate housing weve done see over 80 years we produce about thirty percent of our Regional Housing needs more Affordable Housing we have a housing crisis in San Francisco that is about Affordable Housing not the approval process we have over thirty thousand projects in the pipeline now there are 10 thousand almost near being issued are under construction in San Francisco not one major project has ever been denied by the planning process in San Francisco tens of thousands have been empowered and built dont quite understand who the problem say we have figured out negative impact San Francisco that in order to build housing we need matching transit and community that have neighborhoods serving retail and housing to be afford by the people that work here, a massive investment in transit all of 3 escapes governor jerry brown in his buy right proposal governor jerry brown buildings more in the tooth fairy and the easter bunny than the hard heat process of Community Building housing and Sustainable Community support supervisor peskins measure thank you. Hi laura clark grow sf we certainly dont deny things in San Francisco but marked did art of delay we add years to projects and we all know this is a problem weve been chronologically underbuilding in the bay area for more than thirty years and people that point you to believe that is somehow unrelated to the fact that rent is high those are two very related facts and i see no, he was that we have the political will to create the housing necessary in to address this on a local level and beyond that i see no evidence we have the political will to force the nearby endurances that operates in our main source of people that are working and living and need that community to come and we have the problem in San Francisco where we have this south bay issue and marin a no to bart and housing if we ask for a cut out San Francisco well have cut outs for every city if the bay area and never address this crisis i think you all know that is true additionally i think that if we prevented a big source of funding for avenue is not the tax and fees on marketrate we are going to continue to dig ourselves deeper and deeper into this hole thank you from the San FranciscoTenants Union the supervisors amaze support a resolution to support this i urge you to follow that and support the resolution that commissioner peskin where wrote the tenants groups are concerned about little tailor billions it s all that power and gives to developers i understand youre concerned about the obstacles but it is critical that we dont allow the crisis to be a cover for wholesale deregulation it is true that regulations are obstacles they create obstacles for big businesses trying to create money and the only way to protect the public good ideas like the Housing Stock and regulations are bad ill see that but who makes the regulations work for us ill agree it should be you and me and this city and not governor jerry brown in sacramento and what that bill will do if we dont amend it the way that supervisor peskin is talking about well give up that local control for towards the state and towards those big business interests they dont have the interest of san franciscans in mind and not trying to build Affordable Housing but we agreed we need 25 percent ill argue we need more and theyre under cutting the efforts thank you. I will not repeat what she said are calvin im loving my community about having the checks in what kind of building and what is done and is the developer following through an what we promised we as a communities have that role with planning in insuring the development is that done is done to meet our needs and given that reality and know our history knowing there are those speculators that will try to find any and every loopt to build what they want about profit only is not about those bricks of the frame it is we who makes them homes but the small corner store that is the news giver who tells us who is born and died theyve got keys for those who or forgot full and, have their groceries delivered late at night if youre a senior those make up the communities and thats us not the governor telling us how and what we should and cant checks and balances and who is lou gehrig to pay what having overheard a conversation on the phone in the local bakery it was one landowner with 5 buildings hes being trying to evict people saying listen shes on this paying 19 hundred i can get another thousand so i was able to get her out of there and hell if those technically i didnt will pay ill collect 2 thousand a month ballets be realistic about what this market is not inif i believe this crisis exists thank you good afternoon. I urge to support supervisor peskin the notion a onesizefitsall law should reemit Public Participation in 57 diverse couldnt with 39 people and the 8 largest economy is a direct transfer of those rights to a few powerful Interest Rate groups and the Tech Industry the state protective should amend or reject this legislation and our local City Government of government and should amend or oppose weve adapted the policies with a higher minimums than the state measure will be a monumental step baurtdz that will be an local government to reillys greed item 6 concerning the developments on portland is an excellent example why the mandate planning procedures results in projects that are wildly appreciated instead of projects with broad recreation this will bypass and ignore the protection of Historical Resources to bypass and ignore this restrictions are prohibitions an Small Businesses and artists and to dispense they will improve the projects please move supervisor peskin to the full board with recommendation thank you. Hi, im terry with the Building Program and together without allies im here to give support for supervisor peskin resolution there is a notion that streamlining will make them less expensive to build and it will lead to lower costs to build housing that notion is absorb it is the high represent that people are willing to pay if theres enough hi ended market those folks will charge what folks are ready to pay like tech workers there is a bill that falsifies the tefsh if so about big tech corporations and Venture Capital last week benioff salesfroce said his tech workers are looking for housing those are at the back of people of color and soma half of the major advertisements are build there on the backs of the working Class Community that by right will eliminate all the issues by concerns of traffic impact and population change if we want to talk about population growth lets talk about population change through is growth over the course there will be displaceed. Good afternoon. Im with the council of Community Housing organizations i want to say i agree with you age on the need to do Something Different not enough to put forth an idea because it is a new idea when it results in nothing what does the by right bill it cuts the public process and two according to the laments it cuts the developers costs busy devil percent without any additional affordability it increases the developers profits by 12 percent and 3 no guarantee with the housing will ever get built a solution that based on deregulation not on the real need of building Affordable Housing so what is is it we want in signing on to this Community Labor alliance opposing the bill what sideing with the resolution provided by supervisor peskin we want if you believe that what you want is increasing marketrate housing prozac production youll be asking for an amendment you have to. The cu or lose it actually build a unit if you want to taj mahal and two if you buildings this puts forth Affordable Housing youll have for on amendment that puts a value mechanism that additional profit give to the vendors by the by right is actually results in Affordable Housing and if you believe that public process of the kind we have in San Francisco is not impediment us from building up a backlog of 19 thousand approved units that is 18 thousand units went through the Planning Commission and the kinds of things theyre waiting to be built then you will keep the public process especially for large projects we urge you to support supervisor peskin resolution to oppose the buy right bill thank you. Good afternoon, board of supervisors im here to urge you to forward the supervisor cohens resolution to the full board my reason a frankly the governors bill raises questions the first one buy right for whom and second bow right and third what cost the first question the analysis by the displacement project using the same theology Affordable Housing is more effect and in fact, in some situations like most of eastern neighborhoods is far more effective and yet despite of that were facing a situation in which well be required to have marketrate housing the second thing is what by right the previous speaker mentioned that there are some 18 thousand units of entitled housing in the pipeline marketrate not been built now backlog has built up since 1994 why . Because the entitlements themselves are valuable and can be splatsd and traded the trade the entitlements bills no housing of any kind it does increase the Development Well and yet the third reason at what cost a fundamental city has many speakers said requires parks, requires traffic that didnt deadlock and it requires neighborhoods serving businesses and removing the cities to have a negative impact on such items will have a horrible cost to the city thank you and please support supervisor peskin good afternoon. Im 101 with the senior disability action he urge to support supervisor cohens resolution and want to say the public process and input are mechanisms that may be this better eliminating the discretionary review takes away the democratic process how it impacts our communities there are in the wind and shadow and traffic and population changes are very important issues on how families seniors, workingclass communities, move to schools and work and Pedestrian Safety how those concerns will be addressed without public process and again that is for those are built in mechanisms in order to make projects better thank you. Hi for sf bay area were enthusiastic about the governors bill and supervisor yees resolution supervisor wieners resolution protects you know it protects our occasion controls that is the most important thing about the bill a lot of speakers are confused the governors buy right explicit interfere with the rule 25 after the buy right if sacramento will still be 25 percent so if anyone told us the governors buy right with the local bmr is not true and not radical if anyone told us that was radical not in touch are realty buy right is the way the rest of the United States does land use it would, different than california but put us in line with the rest of the United States the cities have the ability to zone their own cities the governors buy right if youre city decides the Apartment Building to be built so it enforces local control what it does is keeps a small number of opponents from derailing a project because of the labors and want a labor process agreement or their because their neighbors into custody the buy right we have to ask ourselves after 40 year of allowing one or two neighbors to derail the projects i want to echo what was said earlier testimony that a vote for supervisor peskin resolution amendment will be a vote for the status quo we had 40 years of our Current System and not profited us thank you very much i. Lone district 4 resident i want to comment on the previous speaker im not executive director. laughter im opposing the tailor bill as currently drafted trail o7 intent to eliminate the local control over in any housing and eliminates Public Comment and review but any real review by the Planning Commission, Planning Department and board of appeals and board of supervisors the tailor bill 707 creates issues for development in the coastal zone im asking asking you to cack in solidarity by including language to include the coastal zone concerns and finally this bill is the governors nostalgia as the mayor of oakland when we were over rode zoning and fired his planning director to create housing im supporting the supervisor peskin legislation next speaker, please. Hi, im a resident from Hunters Point i hear everybody talking and hey power with you all listen to this im 56 years old and you wouldnt believe my rent is seven hundred and 88 and thats all i want to say. Okay. Is there any Public Comment that want to speak please come on up. Im a residence of San Francisco and im here to ask you to support supervisor peskin legislation i believe in local control of our housing and land use because we live here and shop here and pay taxed i dont think that is fair for someone that far away like governor jerry brown even though he lives in oakland but as governor not the right to tell the local people what to do with their lands we live here the reason im opposed to governor jerry brown buy right but it takes away the right for quality of life and the environmental reviews an important the Public Comment allows our democracy to survive and if we cant have control over our neighborhood what are the other rights to determine what kind of city and what kind of neighborhoods to have in the areas that have you the most influence in so, yes, i think that is really important for all the techies to have hours not having to commute between here and Silicon Valley know that ad a Green House Gas emissions but than the throw the baby out with the bath water im sure once they find housing theyll care about the housing environment in their city weve got to find a mill ground and make use of middle ground to mother displace businesses to accommodate those highend polling people does not side with governor jerry brown and support supervisor peskins legislation thank you. All right. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. At this time. Colleagues id like to make a recommendation we send those forward to the board so they can be considered together i wanted to check in with any final remarks. Im fine with our suggestions madam chair first of all, start by thanking all the members of the public that came to testify as well as individuals that have been in contact with mri my office relative to the subject number 8 on todays calendar and particularly wanted to thank my staff for their work on this let me start out maybe some of the differences between the two resolutions and im not trying to be humorous and not make light but were all entitled to our narrator how we got here there is not denial in the resolution that ive put forward that we are in the midst of a housing crisis many people like to talk about how we got here mr. Lazarus talks about the rezoning of San Francisco in the 19 san jose and people involved in politics that want to say the progressive board of supervisors 2000 i like to counter and remind them weve skoend and like it or not in the eastern neighborhoods and rincon hill the bloifrpt shipyard were the result of that expensive meeting progress that resulted in up zoning of the city in exchange for more affordability for more density that is not new i also agree with the contention that there are cities throughout the state counties throughout the state including in this region not doing what they can and should do and one of the speakers spoke to a wide range of rebates that could be i will add to that in in cases it is racism and other cases it is legitimate issues of impacts on neighborhoods and quality of life by the way, let me say this not a loss on anyone in the room we will live in the descend it city on the seaboard and dont need a doctor as the mayor says the city bird is the crane were building thousands and thousands of units we have tens of thousands of units in the pipeline but very important as we engage if the business of democracy that we give people whether their cases are legitimate or spurus the opportunity to petition their government and have a say and as members of board of supervisors we precede over appeals as a judicial body we dismiss the spurus appeals and indeed last week as a result of that major project where a communitybased organizations appealed a conditional use at 106 of Market Street just down the street in the tenderloin question ended up approving a landmark collision more Affordable Housing at one 01 hyde electricity its precisely where the two resolutions part company im in receipt of an email from spur the Planning Urban ResearchPro Development think tank that raises the same thing that supervisor wiener raised which is on page 2 line 18 the resolution the amended resolution that is before us weve actually yet to amend includes a provision for an approval of major developments continue to allow for public review and local correction approval as currently provided by local laws we know in San Francisco that process is actually helped us build more Affordable Housing we can quibble as happened Community Many times between various members of the board as to 40 percent is real or not and 40 percent is real on paper but in reality in the mid 30s im happy to have that argument ambassador higher than federal and state telephone and 15 and higher than 25 happens because of the nature of those projects to be the subject of tough negotiations between communities and housing advocates and people elected members of the board of supervisors who want the right policy for San Francisco i think that has to the simple ticks look if you look at the things that the mayor and so forth in the letter of june 13th visually all the points that he has in the amended item number 8 but starts with a different tone the mayor says i write with overall support for the tailor bill but requests those key amendments that is simple aromatics i think the unless you make those amendments well treat that bill that was treated in Assembly Bill out of santa monica it is a pillow tactic the bottom line we need to get this piece of legislation right and important as i said before this was these items were sent to committee it would be nice in the city were speaking with one policy voice i believe that the mayors policy feel june 13th and the specific provisions on page 2 of item number 8 as well as the additional further be it resolved, if keeping what the words from the house of labor and not lost not often we hear from a you think 23i9d house of lark from the Building Trades and seiu we specifically include in page 3 of the amendment some provisions that acknowledge that we should support competitive wages and provide apprenticeships were to far apart, in fact, i feel like were arguing over semantics id like to make a motion to accept my attempt to as best as possible peering those two resolutions together and if it is the will of this body to send both items to the full board they need not they can go without recommendation and take that matter up at the for better or worse thank you supervisor peskin. Supervisor wiener you have remarks. Sure to clarify so supervisor peskin your motion to amend with respect 0 your own resolution and put both without recommendation. Thank you is a so a few comments and thank you to the members of the public for coming out and anytime were talking about housing and land use in our beautiful amazing constrained city environment it is going to bring outs peoples passions on all sides of the debate and the debate we should have this is the future of our city and whether were going to actually meaningful fully address this housing crisis or put Forward Solutions not solutions and not help the situation one of the members of the public made a comment about it were building housing for the tech workers and thats not in any view what is happening with the housing were building we have a growing population that started to grow before building much housing people didnt come here for that but wanted to live in San Francisco and not gotten to together in terms of providing enough housing the housing we need to produce in the city is for everything everyone who is in terms of who can move into that housing but make sure the people that are in housing today dont get pushed out there is so few housing with that lack of housing huge pressure on our existing hoefrt this is because we dont have enough housing that is what that boils down to creating housing is not about new residents but making sure our existing residents can stay where they are ive heard comments about the governors as of the legislation eliminates Community Input and again, i want to just to be clear when you look at my resolution i think probation officer peter coming down the pike said my alternative didnt say we sobers but work with the governor to amend miss legislation to actually honor zoning and allow for the number of units that are zoned while still having things like good Design Review and environmental and labor standards and locinclusionary t work with the governor instead of saying we oppose and so there will still be significant Community Input for example, the Community Input that results 2, 3, 4 rezoning that is not line item local zoning controls and supervisor peskin is correct the board of supervisors has magnificently reZoning District rincon hill, etc. That all required a rezoning that was not up to the governor but rezoned we went through extensive process in market octavia, in eastern neighborhoods in rincon hill another Treasure Island and other areas as well as at the Hunters Point shipyard this is all zoning changes lennar and Hunters Point they had to get a massive rezoning so major Community Inputs a decade for market octavia decade for eastern neighborhoods, of Community Input before this zoning happenings happened this wouldnt have changed o processes and that community button one iota we need to stood talking about the fact that the Community Process is probation officer with the and the fact it will continue in zoning with what this legislation does go has nothing to do with with the major designing discussions earlier but once that rezoning with Community Input and give and take one once that happens we should honor that we went through a decade to rezone the eastern neighborhoods and in my district only val a 12 unit project 100 percent after that decade of progress and took 6 years to get that 12 unit project through 6 years and appeal after appeal after appeal and the board of appeals arbitrarily chopped it off eliminated the affordable units in the building why is that a good process and how does that hip our housing situation once with zone in place honor the zone and have good Design Review and local control over inclusionary and everything that that is laid out not changed by the governors legislation you you know the bottom line say we need to be doing things definitely i feel like a lot of the options to this legislation and the desire to exempt out San Francisco and every city in california to, exempted out is really is just feels like more of the same and more the situation with 3,500 that is someday 5 thousand average rent or 6 thousand average rent this is an opportunity to engage in a thoughtful dialogue with the governor to try to come up with a better system for housing california thats why i introduced the alternative legislation us i think well pass it at the board of supervisors but support putting both resolutions how the with no recommendation thank you. Commissioner peskin did you have. Ill reverse my breath for the full board. Thats a good idea. Okay. So lets see we need to take supervisor peskin amendments and accept them. To his own resolution. To his own resolution. You have that madam clerk as amended. Thank you and excuseme. I want to make sure i gave you the amendments. No, but i received email would like to entertain a motion to move items 8 and 9 item 8 as amended to the full board. Without puc madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body . Theres no further business. The office of controllers Whistle Blower Program is how City Employees and recipient sound the alarm an fraud address wait in City Government charitable complaints results in investigation that improves the efficiency of City Government that. You can below the what if anything, by assess though the club Program Website arrest call 4147 or 311 and stating you wishing to file and complaint point Controllers Office the Charitable Program also accepts complaints by email or 0 folk you can file a complaint or provide Contact Information seen by whistle blower investigates some examples of issues to be recorded to the Whistle Blower Program face of misuse of City Government money equipment supplies or materials exposure activities by city clez deficiencies the quality and delivery of City GovernmentServices Waste and inefficient government practices when you submit a complaint to the charitable online complaint form youll receive a unique tracking number that inturgz to detector or determine in investigators need Additional Information by law the City Employee that provide information to the Whistle Blower Program are protected and an employer may not retaliate against an employee that is a whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee