Covid wave hits UP bureaucracy hard
By IANS |
Published on
Wed, Apr 14 2021 14:51 IST |
1 Views
Patna: Beneficiary receives the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine during the third phase of the countrywide inoculation drive, amid coronavirus cases spike across the country, in Patna on Sunday, April 11th, 2021.(photo:AFTAB ALAM SIDDIQUI/IANS). Image Source: IANS News
Lucknow, April 14 : The Corona wave seems to have hit bureaucrats in Uttar Pradesh in a big way. On a day when Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath isolated himself after three members of his team tested Covid positive, at least 12 IAS officers in the state also contracted infection on Tuesday.
COVID-19 wave hits bureaucracy hard in Uttar Pradesh, at least 12 IAS officers infected india.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from india.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Share This -
x
The Kerala High Court held that an Additional District Judge has jurisdiction to entertain a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Principal District Judge can only be considered first among equals and the Additional District Judge is in no way considered to be inferior to the Principal District Judge, the bench comprising Justices CT Ravikumar and K. Haripal observed.
The court observed thus while dismissing an Arbitration Appeal. One of the contentions raised in this Appeal was that an Additional District Judge lacks authority to entertain a petition under Section 34 of the Act. According to the appellant, the matter ought to have been considered by the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction of the District, which is the Principal District Court. Referring to Section 2(e) of the Act, he submitted that court means only principal civil court of original jurisdiction in a district.
Share This -
x Everything cannot be brought to the Supreme Court! You will make a collapsing system collapse completely! , remarked Justice S. K. Kaul on Wednesday.
The bench of Justices Kaul and Hemant Gupta was transversing through its board with 11 miscellaneous matters on it, at-least 4 SLPs of which, in the opinion of the Court, did not warrant its interference. There has to be a cap on the number of tiers of scrutiny! A matter must rest somewhere! , observed Justice Kaul.
The first item was a challenge to a 2019 decision of the Allahabad High Court, sitting in a second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, which, in turn, arose from a 1975 judgment passed by a IIIrd Additional District Judge, whereby the civil appeal was allowed and the decree of the trial court (being the Ist Additional Munsif) was set aside. The High Court had confirmed the judgment of the first appellate court that the claim of the appellants of dedication of the land in dispute by the erstwhile Zamindar
Gole Market land verdict favours JK Housing Board thenorthlines.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thenorthlines.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.