Page 3 - Casey Case News Today

Together. its a choice america makes and its choosing not life in this case. its choosing death for too many of its children. thats a choice. >> the choice that chris murphy made to give that speech which i think tim has been seen more than 2.5 million times before it came on air, he explained in a tweet, driving home tonight, i thought about republicans speeches and how this does not extend today to the kids who were shot. so i turned the car around and went to the senate floor. he knows the st...

First issue of starry desies is and that the court will follow its prior precedence. there needs to be a special justification. >> beyond that, its settled as a precedent of the court and those principles applied in the casey case explain when cases should be revisited and when they should not and it is settled as a precedent of court, yes. >> they used their time today to talk about the quote was the stench of the court. that the backers of the law in mississippi said on the floor of the state ...

It would be telling the women of america it was wrong. that actually the ability to control their bodies and perhaps the most important decision they can make about whether to bring a child into this world is not part of their protected liberty. i think that would come at tremendous cost to the reliance that women have placed on this right and on society reliance and what this right has -- zblb it is a good point. this may be my fault. im talking about pages 854 to 8 63 in the casey case. and i ...

And yet, we have to have public support, and that comes primarily, says casey, i wonder if it was oconnor who wrote that. i dont know. but it comes primarily from people believing that we do our job, we use reason, we dont look to just whats popular. and thats where youve seen the paradox. but the problem with the super case of which weve heard three mentioned, the problem with the super case like this, the rare case, the water shed case, where people are really opposed on both sides, and they r...

Thought the case was wrongly decided in the first instance would run counter to the ability to function as a corner stone of the rule of law in this context. >> is it your argument that a case can never be overruled simply because it was e egregiously long? >> i think at the least the state would have to come forward with changed circumstance or some kind of materially new argument, and mississippi hasnt done so -- >> really? suppose plessi versus ferguson was reargued. nothing had changed. woul...

President. nothing is going to stop him from doing what he wants, right? he doesnt -- he has not allowed the truth to stop him from continuing to lie about the election. all of the things that we know that happened during that white house is, as people start to write their books and people start to feel free to talk, is that donald trump did what he wanted to do when he wanted to do it. and it seems in this case he did it at the possible -- you know -- putting other peoples health at risk during...

They have not decided how to decide these issues. they are engaging and recognizing the truth. that was the greatest decision that this court has reached. it inflicted tremendous damage on our country and it will take imnumerable human lives unless and until the court upholds it. >> thank you, the case is submitted. >> the honorable course is now adjourned until monday at 10:00. >> well, there it is.

Oxford high school in michigan just about 24 hours ago. we will have more coverage of that later today here on msnbc. and on "nbc nightly news." for now, "deadline: white house" will begin in just a moment. will begin in just a moment. ♪♪ hi there, everyone. its 4:00 in new york. today the u.s. supreme court seems poised to make history based on todays oral arguments in the mississippi abortion law case in terms of overturning the protections of roe versus weighed which nearly 50 years ago...

It back to john heilemanns point. we are in the same place except the republicans on the supreme court are not the same as the republican appointees on that supreme court. these republican appointed justices do not appear open to the possibility of preserving precedent. of preserving roe. so we are just talking about how badly it will be decimated. to come back to justice sotomayors point, what do they do about the stench of now being clearly seeing and acting as a political body. >> i think its...

Seen instances where they ask tone deaf questions and what they are trying to tease out an answer -- they cant make their point of view, and they ask questions where they know the answer is going to be and they are trying to get the answer on the record. i dont know if thats the case in this ep stance but i have seen that many times on the supreme court. >> the justices are looking for is there an intermediatia standard because mississippi is now in a full-on way saying it is time to reverse roe...